Remediation Revisited

This article replies to comments by J. C. Gonsiorek (1997) , P. Orr (1997) , and L. S. Brown (1997) on M. J. Layman and J. R. McNamara's (1997) work on remediation and ethics violations. The authors acknowledge various distinctions they have introduced but continue to argue that sexual violatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 1997-06, Vol.28 (3), p.304-305
Main Authors: Layman, Melissa J, McNamara, J. Regis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Human
Impaired Professionals
Professional Client Sexual Relations
Professional Ethics
Professional Referral
Psychologists
Psychotherapists
Rehabilitation
Therapy
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article replies to comments by J. C. Gonsiorek (1997) , P. Orr (1997) , and L. S. Brown (1997) on M. J. Layman and J. R. McNamara's (1997) work on remediation and ethics violations. The authors acknowledge various distinctions they have introduced but continue to argue that sexual violations are outstandingly egregious. They agree that making amends is important but wonder about the practicalities of working this into rehabilitation. Lack of empirical knowledge about what is prescribed for remediation is reemphasized.
ISSN:0735-7028
1939-1323
DOI:10.1037/0735-7028.28.3.304