Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation

A definition of counting is adopted from R. Gelman and R. M. Gallistel (1978) and Piaget (1952) that allows for a comparison between animal and human counting behavior. The evidence, which ranges from early anecdotal reports to modern experimental analyses, suggests that a variety of infrahumans ran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological bulletin 1982-11, Vol.92 (3), p.547-571
Main Authors: Davis, Hank, Memmott, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal
Animals
Learning
Literature Review
Number Comprehension
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A definition of counting is adopted from R. Gelman and R. M. Gallistel (1978) and Piaget (1952) that allows for a comparison between animal and human counting behavior. The evidence, which ranges from early anecdotal reports to modern experimental analyses, suggests that a variety of infrahumans ranging from birds to primates can learn to count, although successful demonstrations are most likely to occur under relatively extreme experimental conditions when alternative predictors of food or safety are unavailable. Counting behavior appears to be a relatively unnatural response in infrahumans, and its acquisition may reflect the boundaries of the animal's associative abilities. (84 ref)
ISSN:0033-2909
1939-1455
DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.547