Commitment Code Revision's Effect on Psychologists' and Psychiatrists' Decision to Hospitalize

The reports of emergency-room "psychiatric" consultations before and after Tennessee revised its mental health commitment code (giving greater recognition to psychologists and broadening the definition of "likelihood of harm") were examined. The diagnostic and disposition referra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 1988-02, Vol.19 (1), p.58-62
Main Author: Wood, Keith A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency Services
Human
Laws
Medical sciences
Mental health
Mental Health Commitment
Professional Consultation
Psychiatrists
Psychodiagnosis
Psychologists
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The reports of emergency-room "psychiatric" consultations before and after Tennessee revised its mental health commitment code (giving greater recognition to psychologists and broadening the definition of "likelihood of harm") were examined. The diagnostic and disposition referral patterns of psychologists were compared with those of psychiatrists. There were no significant interprofessional diagnostic or disposition referral differences before or after the revision (except that psychologists diagnosed personality disorders more frequently). After the revision, both sets of clinicians increased their likelihood of diagnosing affective disorders and recommending psychiatric hospitalizations. These findings support the granting of equal rights and privileges to psychologists and psychiatrists in the emergency commitment process.
ISSN:0735-7028
1939-1323
DOI:10.1037/0735-7028.19.1.58