Loading…

Life Stresses, Explanatory Style, Hopelessness, and Occupational Class

This study uses hopelessness theory to examine systematic variation in explanatory (attributional) style across occupation type. In-depth interviews were carried out with 20 professional and managerial workers and with 20 manual workers. Content analysis of verbatim explanations was used to assess e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of stress management 2005-08, Vol.12 (3), p.241-256
Main Author: Henry, Paul C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a218t-9882eb761e0f5d36e733be41764d4d655f53a8fda4a1a8e6b72633dffa08ebd03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a218t-9882eb761e0f5d36e733be41764d4d655f53a8fda4a1a8e6b72633dffa08ebd03
container_end_page 256
container_issue 3
container_start_page 241
container_title International journal of stress management
container_volume 12
creator Henry, Paul C
description This study uses hopelessness theory to examine systematic variation in explanatory (attributional) style across occupation type. In-depth interviews were carried out with 20 professional and managerial workers and with 20 manual workers. Content analysis of verbatim explanations was used to assess explanatory style. The group of manual workers was found to exhibit a more pessimistic style. This sets up conditions for hopelessness in the face of stressful events, such as upheaval in the workplace. The implication is that workplace stresses are likely to be viewed by the 2 occupational groups through different perceptual frames. Managers need to consider the particular risk of hopelessness among manual working employees during periods of uncertainty and change.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/1072-5245.12.3.241
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_614421185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614421185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a218t-9882eb761e0f5d36e733be41764d4d655f53a8fda4a1a8e6b72633dffa08ebd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKcgHpu4s1-JRymtFQo9qOdlkt2FlJjE3S2Yf--WWjwMM8w87zDzEnIPtADKyyegJcslE7IAVvCCCbggM5Alz7lg4jLVZ-Ca3ISwp5QKkGxG1tvW2ew9ehuCDYts9TN22GMc_JS6U2cX2WYYbZfGfYpFhr3Jdk1zGDG2Q49dtuwwhFty5bAL9u4vz8nnevWx3OTb3evb8mWbI4Mq5s9VxWxdKrDUScOVLTmvrYBSCSOMktJJjpUzKBCwsqoumeLcOIe0srWhfE4eTntHP3wfbIh6Pxx8OiNoBUIwgEomiJ2gxg8heOv06Nsv9JMGqo926aMb-uiGBqa5TnYl0eNJhCPqMUwN-tg26W8dov_HfgF3fWlT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614421185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life Stresses, Explanatory Style, Hopelessness, and Occupational Class</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Henry, Paul C</creator><creatorcontrib>Henry, Paul C</creatorcontrib><description>This study uses hopelessness theory to examine systematic variation in explanatory (attributional) style across occupation type. In-depth interviews were carried out with 20 professional and managerial workers and with 20 manual workers. Content analysis of verbatim explanations was used to assess explanatory style. The group of manual workers was found to exhibit a more pessimistic style. This sets up conditions for hopelessness in the face of stressful events, such as upheaval in the workplace. The implication is that workplace stresses are likely to be viewed by the 2 occupational groups through different perceptual frames. Managers need to consider the particular risk of hopelessness among manual working employees during periods of uncertainty and change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-5245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/1072-5245.12.3.241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Attribution ; Employee Attitudes ; Hopelessness ; Human ; Male ; Occupational Stress ; Occupations ; Stress</subject><ispartof>International journal of stress management, 2005-08, Vol.12 (3), p.241-256</ispartof><rights>2005 Educational Publishing Foundation</rights><rights>2005, Educational Publishing Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a218t-9882eb761e0f5d36e733be41764d4d655f53a8fda4a1a8e6b72633dffa08ebd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a218t-9882eb761e0f5d36e733be41764d4d655f53a8fda4a1a8e6b72633dffa08ebd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henry, Paul C</creatorcontrib><title>Life Stresses, Explanatory Style, Hopelessness, and Occupational Class</title><title>International journal of stress management</title><description>This study uses hopelessness theory to examine systematic variation in explanatory (attributional) style across occupation type. In-depth interviews were carried out with 20 professional and managerial workers and with 20 manual workers. Content analysis of verbatim explanations was used to assess explanatory style. The group of manual workers was found to exhibit a more pessimistic style. This sets up conditions for hopelessness in the face of stressful events, such as upheaval in the workplace. The implication is that workplace stresses are likely to be viewed by the 2 occupational groups through different perceptual frames. Managers need to consider the particular risk of hopelessness among manual working employees during periods of uncertainty and change.</description><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Employee Attitudes</subject><subject>Hopelessness</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Occupational Stress</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>1072-5245</issn><issn>1573-3424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKcgHpu4s1-JRymtFQo9qOdlkt2FlJjE3S2Yf--WWjwMM8w87zDzEnIPtADKyyegJcslE7IAVvCCCbggM5Alz7lg4jLVZ-Ca3ISwp5QKkGxG1tvW2ew9ehuCDYts9TN22GMc_JS6U2cX2WYYbZfGfYpFhr3Jdk1zGDG2Q49dtuwwhFty5bAL9u4vz8nnevWx3OTb3evb8mWbI4Mq5s9VxWxdKrDUScOVLTmvrYBSCSOMktJJjpUzKBCwsqoumeLcOIe0srWhfE4eTntHP3wfbIh6Pxx8OiNoBUIwgEomiJ2gxg8heOv06Nsv9JMGqo926aMb-uiGBqa5TnYl0eNJhCPqMUwN-tg26W8dov_HfgF3fWlT</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Henry, Paul C</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>Life Stresses, Explanatory Style, Hopelessness, and Occupational Class</title><author>Henry, Paul C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a218t-9882eb761e0f5d36e733be41764d4d655f53a8fda4a1a8e6b72633dffa08ebd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Employee Attitudes</topic><topic>Hopelessness</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Occupational Stress</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henry, Paul C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>International journal of stress management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henry, Paul C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life Stresses, Explanatory Style, Hopelessness, and Occupational Class</atitle><jtitle>International journal of stress management</jtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>241-256</pages><issn>1072-5245</issn><eissn>1573-3424</eissn><abstract>This study uses hopelessness theory to examine systematic variation in explanatory (attributional) style across occupation type. In-depth interviews were carried out with 20 professional and managerial workers and with 20 manual workers. Content analysis of verbatim explanations was used to assess explanatory style. The group of manual workers was found to exhibit a more pessimistic style. This sets up conditions for hopelessness in the face of stressful events, such as upheaval in the workplace. The implication is that workplace stresses are likely to be viewed by the 2 occupational groups through different perceptual frames. Managers need to consider the particular risk of hopelessness among manual working employees during periods of uncertainty and change.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/1072-5245.12.3.241</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1072-5245
ispartof International journal of stress management, 2005-08, Vol.12 (3), p.241-256
issn 1072-5245
1573-3424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_614421185
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Attribution
Employee Attitudes
Hopelessness
Human
Male
Occupational Stress
Occupations
Stress
title Life Stresses, Explanatory Style, Hopelessness, and Occupational Class
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20Stresses,%20Explanatory%20Style,%20Hopelessness,%20and%20Occupational%20Class&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20stress%20management&rft.au=Henry,%20Paul%20C&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=241-256&rft.issn=1072-5245&rft.eissn=1573-3424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/1072-5245.12.3.241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614421185%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a218t-9882eb761e0f5d36e733be41764d4d655f53a8fda4a1a8e6b72633dffa08ebd03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614421185&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true