Cost of Quality at a Clinical Laboratory in a Resource-Limited Country

Health care decision makers often have a limited understanding of the costs associated with quality improvement efforts. However, such information is vital for managers to make appropriate operational and financial decisions to ensure high quality health care services. We used the Cost of Quality (C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Laboratory medicine 2010-07, Vol.41 (7), p.429-433
Main Authors: Elbireer, Ali, Gable, Alicia R, Jackson, J. Brooks
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical outcomes
Cost of quality
Developing countries
Economic aspects
Health care costs
Hospitals
LDCs
Medical care quality
Medical laboratories
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Health care decision makers often have a limited understanding of the costs associated with quality improvement efforts. However, such information is vital for managers to make appropriate operational and financial decisions to ensure high quality health care services. We used the Cost of Quality (COQ) model to estimate the cost of quality-related activities at the Makerere University-Johns Hopkins University (MU-JHU) Laboratory in Uganda. Using data collected from January 1, 2007-December 31, 2007, we allocated the direct costs associated with quality-related activities in the laboratory across COQ's cost categories: prevention, appraisal, internal failures, and external failures. We found that approximately 94% of total COQ was spent on costs of "good quality" (prevention and appraisal), while 6% was spent on costs of "poor quality" (internal and external failures). The high percentage of COQ spent on prevention and appraisal activities is consistent with efforts to ensure high quality laboratory results. Future studies should try to link COQ to health outcomes and quantify "hidden" failure costs. This CE update introduces the Cost of Quality (COQ) model and illustrates how it can be applied to a clinical laboratory setting to help managers and executives make more informed decisions about spending on quality-related activities. We begin with an overview of the COQ concept and its 4 main cost categories, followed by an illustration of how the model can be applied in a medical laboratory setting. We then discuss some of the advantages and limitations of this methodology and provide suggestions for future research. Keywords: cost of quality, calculation of quality costs, clinical laboratory, resource-limited setting, Uganda
ISSN:0007-5027
1943-7730
DOI:10.1309/LMCZ0ZFR80QWIBEM