Loading…
REAL KNOWLEDGE IS TO KNOW THE EXTENT OF ONE'S OWN IGNORANCE: ON THE CONSUMER HARM APPROACH IN INNOVATION-RELATED COMPETITION CASES
Confucius was neither an expert on competition law, nor one on intellectual property. However, thanks to their universal truth, the words of wisdom of this ancient philosopher can help raise their awareness of how they behave and how they argue even in modern times. Asking the right questions in com...
Saved in:
Published in: | Antitrust law journal 2010-03, Vol.76 (3), p.677-708 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Confucius was neither an expert on competition law, nor one on intellectual property. However, thanks to their universal truth, the words of wisdom of this ancient philosopher can help raise their awareness of how they behave and how they argue even in modern times. Asking the right questions in competition law may be of little use if people cannot provide reliable answers. Yet acknowledging such limitations of their cognitive capacity may be in itself a big step ahead in enhancing the general debate on how to handle competition cases. The problem of uncertainty is well known and discussed in merger cases, where the pre-merger notification system requires competition agencies to predict the "likely" effects of a merger on competition. This article focuses on unilateral and joint conduct in innovation-related markets, which produce another set of cases where the problem of uncertainty is particularly acute. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-6056 2326-9774 |