Loading…

Genetic estimates of immigration and emigration rates in relation to population density and forest patch area in Peromyscus leucopus

An emerging pattern is that population densities of generalist rodents are higher in small compared to large forest patches in fragmented landscapes. We used genetically based measures of migration between patches to test two dispersal-based hypotheses for this negative density-area relationship: (1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation genetics 2010-10, Vol.11 (5), p.1593-1605
Main Authors: Anderson, Christine S, Meikle, Douglas B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-303f0fb13be34ef566c24215f15aec108e0ad37d2542d7ee3b9984f438d120743
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-303f0fb13be34ef566c24215f15aec108e0ad37d2542d7ee3b9984f438d120743
container_end_page 1605
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1593
container_title Conservation genetics
container_volume 11
creator Anderson, Christine S
Meikle, Douglas B
description An emerging pattern is that population densities of generalist rodents are higher in small compared to large forest patches in fragmented landscapes. We used genetically based measures of migration between patches to test two dispersal-based hypotheses for this negative density-area relationship: (1) emigration rates from small patches should be relatively lower compared to large patches (“inhibited dispersal hypothesis”), or (2) immigration rates should be higher into small than large patches (“immigration hypothesis”). Neither hypothesis was supported using data on dispersal inferred from eight microsatellite loci for 12 populations of Peromyscus leucopus in six small (1.3-2.7 ha) and six large (8-150 ha) forest patches. Emigration rates were not lower from and immigration rates were not higher into small than large patches. In fact, contrary to both hypotheses, emigration rates were higher from populations of P. leucopus in small compared to large patches. Based on a combination of genetic and field data, we speculate that higher reproduction in smaller patches resulted in higher densities which led to higher emigration rates from those patches. Rates of reproduction (presumably driven by better habitat conditions in smaller patches), rather than dispersal, seems to drive density differences in forest patches. We conclude that smaller forest patches within an agricultural matrix act as a source of individuals, and that migration rates are fairly high among forest patches regardless of size.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10592-009-0033-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_751996993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2143889291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-303f0fb13be34ef566c24215f15aec108e0ad37d2542d7ee3b9984f438d120743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkDPBm8V2cybdMcRfwCQUE9h2w7WSu7TU3aw9794Wat4M1DyMzwPm8yb5adIlwggLqMCKWWOYBOhyivd7IDLJXMtSK1u62rKodK4n52GOMHAFZS4UH2dcc9j10jOI7d2o4chXeiW6-7ZbBj53th-1bwXxt-NF0qeDVPRi8GP0y_Xct97MbND-Z8SLZisGPzLmxgu-WeOfj1JjZTFCuemkTG42zP2VXkk9_7KHu7vXm9vs8fn-4erq8e84ZIjzkBOXALpAVTwS5t1MhCYumwtNwg1Ay2JdXKspCtYqaF1nXhCqpblKAKOsrOZ98h-M8pfc18-Cn06UmjStS60pqSCGdRE3yMgZ0ZQkombAyC2WZt5qxNytpsszZ1YuTMxKTtlxz-jP-DzmbIWW_sMnTRvL1IQAKsNRBI-ga8W40P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751996993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic estimates of immigration and emigration rates in relation to population density and forest patch area in Peromyscus leucopus</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Anderson, Christine S ; Meikle, Douglas B</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Christine S ; Meikle, Douglas B</creatorcontrib><description>An emerging pattern is that population densities of generalist rodents are higher in small compared to large forest patches in fragmented landscapes. We used genetically based measures of migration between patches to test two dispersal-based hypotheses for this negative density-area relationship: (1) emigration rates from small patches should be relatively lower compared to large patches (“inhibited dispersal hypothesis”), or (2) immigration rates should be higher into small than large patches (“immigration hypothesis”). Neither hypothesis was supported using data on dispersal inferred from eight microsatellite loci for 12 populations of Peromyscus leucopus in six small (1.3-2.7 ha) and six large (8-150 ha) forest patches. Emigration rates were not lower from and immigration rates were not higher into small than large patches. In fact, contrary to both hypotheses, emigration rates were higher from populations of P. leucopus in small compared to large patches. Based on a combination of genetic and field data, we speculate that higher reproduction in smaller patches resulted in higher densities which led to higher emigration rates from those patches. Rates of reproduction (presumably driven by better habitat conditions in smaller patches), rather than dispersal, seems to drive density differences in forest patches. We conclude that smaller forest patches within an agricultural matrix act as a source of individuals, and that migration rates are fairly high among forest patches regardless of size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-0621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10592-009-0033-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Assignment tests ; Biodiversity ; Conservation biology ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Dispersal ; Ecology ; Emigration ; Evolutionary Biology ; Forests ; gene flow ; Genetics ; habitat fragmentation ; Immigration ; Life Sciences ; Microsatellite DNA markers ; Original Paper ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Population density ; Rodents ; White-footed mouse</subject><ispartof>Conservation genetics, 2010-10, Vol.11 (5), p.1593-1605</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-303f0fb13be34ef566c24215f15aec108e0ad37d2542d7ee3b9984f438d120743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-303f0fb13be34ef566c24215f15aec108e0ad37d2542d7ee3b9984f438d120743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Christine S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meikle, Douglas B</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic estimates of immigration and emigration rates in relation to population density and forest patch area in Peromyscus leucopus</title><title>Conservation genetics</title><addtitle>Conserv Genet</addtitle><description>An emerging pattern is that population densities of generalist rodents are higher in small compared to large forest patches in fragmented landscapes. We used genetically based measures of migration between patches to test two dispersal-based hypotheses for this negative density-area relationship: (1) emigration rates from small patches should be relatively lower compared to large patches (“inhibited dispersal hypothesis”), or (2) immigration rates should be higher into small than large patches (“immigration hypothesis”). Neither hypothesis was supported using data on dispersal inferred from eight microsatellite loci for 12 populations of Peromyscus leucopus in six small (1.3-2.7 ha) and six large (8-150 ha) forest patches. Emigration rates were not lower from and immigration rates were not higher into small than large patches. In fact, contrary to both hypotheses, emigration rates were higher from populations of P. leucopus in small compared to large patches. Based on a combination of genetic and field data, we speculate that higher reproduction in smaller patches resulted in higher densities which led to higher emigration rates from those patches. Rates of reproduction (presumably driven by better habitat conditions in smaller patches), rather than dispersal, seems to drive density differences in forest patches. We conclude that smaller forest patches within an agricultural matrix act as a source of individuals, and that migration rates are fairly high among forest patches regardless of size.</description><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Assignment tests</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>gene flow</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microsatellite DNA markers</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>White-footed mouse</subject><issn>1566-0621</issn><issn>1572-9737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkDPBm8V2cybdMcRfwCQUE9h2w7WSu7TU3aw9794Wat4M1DyMzwPm8yb5adIlwggLqMCKWWOYBOhyivd7IDLJXMtSK1u62rKodK4n52GOMHAFZS4UH2dcc9j10jOI7d2o4chXeiW6-7ZbBj53th-1bwXxt-NF0qeDVPRi8GP0y_Xct97MbND-Z8SLZisGPzLmxgu-WeOfj1JjZTFCuemkTG42zP2VXkk9_7KHu7vXm9vs8fn-4erq8e84ZIjzkBOXALpAVTwS5t1MhCYumwtNwg1Ay2JdXKspCtYqaF1nXhCqpblKAKOsrOZ98h-M8pfc18-Cn06UmjStS60pqSCGdRE3yMgZ0ZQkombAyC2WZt5qxNytpsszZ1YuTMxKTtlxz-jP-DzmbIWW_sMnTRvL1IQAKsNRBI-ga8W40P</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Anderson, Christine S</creator><creator>Meikle, Douglas B</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Genetic estimates of immigration and emigration rates in relation to population density and forest patch area in Peromyscus leucopus</title><author>Anderson, Christine S ; Meikle, Douglas B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-303f0fb13be34ef566c24215f15aec108e0ad37d2542d7ee3b9984f438d120743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Assignment tests</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>gene flow</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microsatellite DNA markers</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>White-footed mouse</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Christine S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meikle, Douglas B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Christine S</au><au>Meikle, Douglas B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic estimates of immigration and emigration rates in relation to population density and forest patch area in Peromyscus leucopus</atitle><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle><stitle>Conserv Genet</stitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1593</spage><epage>1605</epage><pages>1593-1605</pages><issn>1566-0621</issn><eissn>1572-9737</eissn><abstract>An emerging pattern is that population densities of generalist rodents are higher in small compared to large forest patches in fragmented landscapes. We used genetically based measures of migration between patches to test two dispersal-based hypotheses for this negative density-area relationship: (1) emigration rates from small patches should be relatively lower compared to large patches (“inhibited dispersal hypothesis”), or (2) immigration rates should be higher into small than large patches (“immigration hypothesis”). Neither hypothesis was supported using data on dispersal inferred from eight microsatellite loci for 12 populations of Peromyscus leucopus in six small (1.3-2.7 ha) and six large (8-150 ha) forest patches. Emigration rates were not lower from and immigration rates were not higher into small than large patches. In fact, contrary to both hypotheses, emigration rates were higher from populations of P. leucopus in small compared to large patches. Based on a combination of genetic and field data, we speculate that higher reproduction in smaller patches resulted in higher densities which led to higher emigration rates from those patches. Rates of reproduction (presumably driven by better habitat conditions in smaller patches), rather than dispersal, seems to drive density differences in forest patches. We conclude that smaller forest patches within an agricultural matrix act as a source of individuals, and that migration rates are fairly high among forest patches regardless of size.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10592-009-0033-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1566-0621
ispartof Conservation genetics, 2010-10, Vol.11 (5), p.1593-1605
issn 1566-0621
1572-9737
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_751996993
source Springer Nature
subjects Animal Genetics and Genomics
Assignment tests
Biodiversity
Conservation biology
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Dispersal
Ecology
Emigration
Evolutionary Biology
Forests
gene flow
Genetics
habitat fragmentation
Immigration
Life Sciences
Microsatellite DNA markers
Original Paper
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Population density
Rodents
White-footed mouse
title Genetic estimates of immigration and emigration rates in relation to population density and forest patch area in Peromyscus leucopus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20estimates%20of%20immigration%20and%20emigration%20rates%20in%20relation%20to%20population%20density%20and%20forest%20patch%20area%20in%20Peromyscus%20leucopus&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20genetics&rft.au=Anderson,%20Christine%20S&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1593&rft.epage=1605&rft.pages=1593-1605&rft.issn=1566-0621&rft.eissn=1572-9737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10592-009-0033-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2143889291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-303f0fb13be34ef566c24215f15aec108e0ad37d2542d7ee3b9984f438d120743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751996993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true