Loading…

High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma

Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FD...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2010-12, Vol.136 (12), p.1929-1935
Main Authors: Chung, Hyun Woo, Lee, Eun Jeong, Cho, Yo-Han, Yoon, So Young, So, Young, Kim, Sung-Yong, Lee, Mark Hong, Kim, Jeong Hwan, Lee, Sun-Young, Sung, In-Kyung, Park, Hyung-Seok, Yoo, Moon-Won, Lee, Kyung-Yung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543
container_end_page 1935
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1929
container_title Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
container_volume 136
creator Chung, Hyun Woo
Lee, Eun Jeong
Cho, Yo-Han
Yoon, So Young
So, Young
Kim, Sung-Yong
Lee, Mark Hong
Kim, Jeong Hwan
Lee, Sun-Young
Sung, In-Kyung
Park, Hyung-Seok
Yoo, Moon-Won
Lee, Kyung-Yung
description Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (>8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_815308682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2202683911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-ACERLH0Bk7jp0j2n4hVQKJ7dmadZzUpZssdlYV_56JstAbp_HMPPPO6LUQ7xA-I4A5zwCVkiUglGC1LPULscK5gkrpl2IFaLDUEusTcZrzA3CujXwtTiQoqMHalQg3sb8vri6ui8N-op-hiEPx_XJzvt4U-xTa6KdcPI0pB07HfhhzzDOypymGYe7F6b7YhYnyxCVf9PxIHKkNw-gp-TiMO3ojXnX0mMPbYzwTd1eXm_VNefvt-uv6y23pK1lNZW21tu122xitfYV1C4YatLWqtW-QGoaMoa7TPlQ-kOqww9bW1kC9NV5X6kx8XHT52F-HkCf3MB7SwCudRa2AWckQLpBPY84pdG6f4o7Sb4fgZl_d4qtjX93sq9M88_4ofNjuQvtv4q-RDHw6ApQ9PXaJBh_zM6cqbLRSzMmFy9wa-pCeL_zf9g_LUEejoz6x8N0PCagAG9DAX_4HlnWX-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815308682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Chung, Hyun Woo ; Lee, Eun Jeong ; Cho, Yo-Han ; Yoon, So Young ; So, Young ; Kim, Sung-Yong ; Lee, Mark Hong ; Kim, Jeong Hwan ; Lee, Sun-Young ; Sung, In-Kyung ; Park, Hyung-Seok ; Yoo, Moon-Won ; Lee, Kyung-Yung</creator><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hyun Woo ; Lee, Eun Jeong ; Cho, Yo-Han ; Yoon, So Young ; So, Young ; Kim, Sung-Yong ; Lee, Mark Hong ; Kim, Jeong Hwan ; Lee, Sun-Young ; Sung, In-Kyung ; Park, Hyung-Seok ; Yoo, Moon-Won ; Lee, Kyung-Yung</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (&gt;8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-5216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20306088</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCROD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Cancer Research ; FDG ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Hematology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastasis ; Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Oncology ; Original Paper ; Palliative Care - methods ; Palliative Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; PET/CT ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2010-12, Vol.136 (12), p.1929-1935</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23419533$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20306088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hyun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yo-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, So Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mark Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sun-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, In-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyung-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Moon-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyung-Yung</creatorcontrib><title>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</title><title>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (&gt;8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>FDG</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Palliative Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>PET/CT</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0171-5216</issn><issn>1432-1335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-ACERLH0Bk7jp0j2n4hVQKJ7dmadZzUpZssdlYV_56JstAbp_HMPPPO6LUQ7xA-I4A5zwCVkiUglGC1LPULscK5gkrpl2IFaLDUEusTcZrzA3CujXwtTiQoqMHalQg3sb8vri6ui8N-op-hiEPx_XJzvt4U-xTa6KdcPI0pB07HfhhzzDOypymGYe7F6b7YhYnyxCVf9PxIHKkNw-gp-TiMO3ojXnX0mMPbYzwTd1eXm_VNefvt-uv6y23pK1lNZW21tu122xitfYV1C4YatLWqtW-QGoaMoa7TPlQ-kOqww9bW1kC9NV5X6kx8XHT52F-HkCf3MB7SwCudRa2AWckQLpBPY84pdG6f4o7Sb4fgZl_d4qtjX93sq9M88_4ofNjuQvtv4q-RDHw6ApQ9PXaJBh_zM6cqbLRSzMmFy9wa-pCeL_zf9g_LUEejoz6x8N0PCagAG9DAX_4HlnWX-Q</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Chung, Hyun Woo</creator><creator>Lee, Eun Jeong</creator><creator>Cho, Yo-Han</creator><creator>Yoon, So Young</creator><creator>So, Young</creator><creator>Kim, Sung-Yong</creator><creator>Lee, Mark Hong</creator><creator>Kim, Jeong Hwan</creator><creator>Lee, Sun-Young</creator><creator>Sung, In-Kyung</creator><creator>Park, Hyung-Seok</creator><creator>Yoo, Moon-Won</creator><creator>Lee, Kyung-Yung</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</title><author>Chung, Hyun Woo ; Lee, Eun Jeong ; Cho, Yo-Han ; Yoon, So Young ; So, Young ; Kim, Sung-Yong ; Lee, Mark Hong ; Kim, Jeong Hwan ; Lee, Sun-Young ; Sung, In-Kyung ; Park, Hyung-Seok ; Yoo, Moon-Won ; Lee, Kyung-Yung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>FDG</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Palliative Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>PET/CT</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hyun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yo-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, So Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mark Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sun-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, In-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyung-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Moon-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyung-Yung</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chung, Hyun Woo</au><au>Lee, Eun Jeong</au><au>Cho, Yo-Han</au><au>Yoon, So Young</au><au>So, Young</au><au>Kim, Sung-Yong</au><au>Lee, Mark Hong</au><au>Kim, Jeong Hwan</au><au>Lee, Sun-Young</au><au>Sung, In-Kyung</au><au>Park, Hyung-Seok</au><au>Yoo, Moon-Won</au><au>Lee, Kyung-Yung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1929</spage><epage>1935</epage><pages>1929-1935</pages><issn>0171-5216</issn><eissn>1432-1335</eissn><coden>JCROD7</coden><abstract>Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (&gt;8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20306088</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-5216
ispartof Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2010-12, Vol.136 (12), p.1929-1935
issn 0171-5216
1432-1335
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_815308682
source Springer Nature
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic agents
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Cancer
Cancer Research
FDG
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gastrointestinal diseases
Hematology
Humans
Internal Medicine
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Medical prognosis
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Oncology
Original Paper
Palliative Care - methods
Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data
PET/CT
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis
Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
title High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A42%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20FDG%20uptake%20in%20PET/CT%20predicts%20worse%20prognosis%20in%20patients%20with%20metastatic%20gastric%20adenocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Chung,%20Hyun%20Woo&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1929&rft.epage=1935&rft.pages=1929-1935&rft.issn=0171-5216&rft.eissn=1432-1335&rft.coden=JCROD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2202683911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815308682&rft_id=info:pmid/20306088&rfr_iscdi=true