Loading…
High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma
Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FD...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2010-12, Vol.136 (12), p.1929-1935 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543 |
container_end_page | 1935 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1929 |
container_title | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Chung, Hyun Woo Lee, Eun Jeong Cho, Yo-Han Yoon, So Young So, Young Kim, Sung-Yong Lee, Mark Hong Kim, Jeong Hwan Lee, Sun-Young Sung, In-Kyung Park, Hyung-Seok Yoo, Moon-Won Lee, Kyung-Yung |
description | Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (>8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_815308682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2202683911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-ACERLH0Bk7jp0j2n4hVQKJ7dmadZzUpZssdlYV_56JstAbp_HMPPPO6LUQ7xA-I4A5zwCVkiUglGC1LPULscK5gkrpl2IFaLDUEusTcZrzA3CujXwtTiQoqMHalQg3sb8vri6ui8N-op-hiEPx_XJzvt4U-xTa6KdcPI0pB07HfhhzzDOypymGYe7F6b7YhYnyxCVf9PxIHKkNw-gp-TiMO3ojXnX0mMPbYzwTd1eXm_VNefvt-uv6y23pK1lNZW21tu122xitfYV1C4YatLWqtW-QGoaMoa7TPlQ-kOqww9bW1kC9NV5X6kx8XHT52F-HkCf3MB7SwCudRa2AWckQLpBPY84pdG6f4o7Sb4fgZl_d4qtjX93sq9M88_4ofNjuQvtv4q-RDHw6ApQ9PXaJBh_zM6cqbLRSzMmFy9wa-pCeL_zf9g_LUEejoz6x8N0PCagAG9DAX_4HlnWX-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815308682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Chung, Hyun Woo ; Lee, Eun Jeong ; Cho, Yo-Han ; Yoon, So Young ; So, Young ; Kim, Sung-Yong ; Lee, Mark Hong ; Kim, Jeong Hwan ; Lee, Sun-Young ; Sung, In-Kyung ; Park, Hyung-Seok ; Yoo, Moon-Won ; Lee, Kyung-Yung</creator><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hyun Woo ; Lee, Eun Jeong ; Cho, Yo-Han ; Yoon, So Young ; So, Young ; Kim, Sung-Yong ; Lee, Mark Hong ; Kim, Jeong Hwan ; Lee, Sun-Young ; Sung, In-Kyung ; Park, Hyung-Seok ; Yoo, Moon-Won ; Lee, Kyung-Yung</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (>8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-5216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20306088</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCROD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Cancer Research ; FDG ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Hematology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastasis ; Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Oncology ; Original Paper ; Palliative Care - methods ; Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data ; PET/CT ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2010-12, Vol.136 (12), p.1929-1935</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23419533$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20306088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hyun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yo-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, So Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mark Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sun-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, In-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyung-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Moon-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyung-Yung</creatorcontrib><title>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</title><title>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (>8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>FDG</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>PET/CT</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0171-5216</issn><issn>1432-1335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-ACERLH0Bk7jp0j2n4hVQKJ7dmadZzUpZssdlYV_56JstAbp_HMPPPO6LUQ7xA-I4A5zwCVkiUglGC1LPULscK5gkrpl2IFaLDUEusTcZrzA3CujXwtTiQoqMHalQg3sb8vri6ui8N-op-hiEPx_XJzvt4U-xTa6KdcPI0pB07HfhhzzDOypymGYe7F6b7YhYnyxCVf9PxIHKkNw-gp-TiMO3ojXnX0mMPbYzwTd1eXm_VNefvt-uv6y23pK1lNZW21tu122xitfYV1C4YatLWqtW-QGoaMoa7TPlQ-kOqww9bW1kC9NV5X6kx8XHT52F-HkCf3MB7SwCudRa2AWckQLpBPY84pdG6f4o7Sb4fgZl_d4qtjX93sq9M88_4ofNjuQvtv4q-RDHw6ApQ9PXaJBh_zM6cqbLRSzMmFy9wa-pCeL_zf9g_LUEejoz6x8N0PCagAG9DAX_4HlnWX-Q</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Chung, Hyun Woo</creator><creator>Lee, Eun Jeong</creator><creator>Cho, Yo-Han</creator><creator>Yoon, So Young</creator><creator>So, Young</creator><creator>Kim, Sung-Yong</creator><creator>Lee, Mark Hong</creator><creator>Kim, Jeong Hwan</creator><creator>Lee, Sun-Young</creator><creator>Sung, In-Kyung</creator><creator>Park, Hyung-Seok</creator><creator>Yoo, Moon-Won</creator><creator>Lee, Kyung-Yung</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</title><author>Chung, Hyun Woo ; Lee, Eun Jeong ; Cho, Yo-Han ; Yoon, So Young ; So, Young ; Kim, Sung-Yong ; Lee, Mark Hong ; Kim, Jeong Hwan ; Lee, Sun-Young ; Sung, In-Kyung ; Park, Hyung-Seok ; Yoo, Moon-Won ; Lee, Kyung-Yung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>FDG</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>PET/CT</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hyun Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yo-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, So Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mark Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jeong Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sun-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, In-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyung-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Moon-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyung-Yung</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chung, Hyun Woo</au><au>Lee, Eun Jeong</au><au>Cho, Yo-Han</au><au>Yoon, So Young</au><au>So, Young</au><au>Kim, Sung-Yong</au><au>Lee, Mark Hong</au><au>Kim, Jeong Hwan</au><au>Lee, Sun-Young</au><au>Sung, In-Kyung</au><au>Park, Hyung-Seok</au><au>Yoo, Moon-Won</au><au>Lee, Kyung-Yung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1929</spage><epage>1935</epage><pages>1929-1935</pages><issn>0171-5216</issn><eissn>1432-1335</eissn><coden>JCROD7</coden><abstract>Purpose We evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma before palliative chemotherapy to predict prognosis and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The study included 35 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent FDG-PET/CT before palliative chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was assessed to evaluate survival and chemotherapeutic response. Survival analysis was performed for time to progression and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Results All primary tumors were visualized using FDG-PET/CT (mean SUVmax = 8.1 ± 4.5, range 2.5-22.1). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detection of solid organ metastasis were 95.2% (20/21), 100% (14/14), and 97.1% (34/35), respectively. No significant difference of primary tumor SUVmax was found among the chemotherapeutic response groups. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated ECOG performance status (≥2), presence of solid organ metastasis, number of organs involved in distant metastasis (≥2), and SUVmax of the primary tumor (>8) as significant predictors for poor overall survival. Multivariate survival analysis showed SUVmax of the primary tumor (P = 0.048), presence of solid organ metastasis (P = 0.015), and ECOG performance status (P = 0.002) as significant independent prognostic predictors for overall survival. Conclusions High FDG uptake of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with poor overall survival. Assessment of tumor FDG uptake has limited value for prediction of chemotherapeutic response, but provides useful information regarding prognosis.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20306088</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-5216 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2010-12, Vol.136 (12), p.1929-1935 |
issn | 0171-5216 1432-1335 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_815308682 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic agents Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Cancer Cancer Research FDG Female Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - pharmacokinetics Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Gastrointestinal diseases Hematology Humans Internal Medicine Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Medical prognosis Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastasis Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma Middle Aged Neoplasm Metastasis Oncology Original Paper Palliative Care - methods Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data PET/CT Pharmacology. Drug treatments Positron-Emission Tomography - methods prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Treatment Outcome Tumors |
title | High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A42%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20FDG%20uptake%20in%20PET/CT%20predicts%20worse%20prognosis%20in%20patients%20with%20metastatic%20gastric%20adenocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Chung,%20Hyun%20Woo&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1929&rft.epage=1935&rft.pages=1929-1935&rft.issn=0171-5216&rft.eissn=1432-1335&rft.coden=JCROD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00432-010-0852-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2202683911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-68558dbb9755c416d07a9186365c91a942477aff5ce4cea3f1f1d868706b7c543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815308682&rft_id=info:pmid/20306088&rfr_iscdi=true |