Loading…

Nitrogen Source and Rate Effects on Velvet Bentgrass Putting Green Turf

Nitrogen source and rate effects on velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.; VBG) putting greens are not well documented, particularly in the north central United States which has different conditions than areas where VBG is normally grown. Acidic soil pH is perceived as necessary for VBG; in nonacidic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Crop science 2011, Vol.51 (1), p.342-352
Main Authors: Pease, Benjamin W, Koeritz, Eric J, Soldat, Douglas J, Stier, John C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-3987cecdda68a3590e16ebefa66047bc02407b0733c50057596ef659745809373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-3987cecdda68a3590e16ebefa66047bc02407b0733c50057596ef659745809373
container_end_page 352
container_issue 1
container_start_page 342
container_title Crop science
container_volume 51
creator Pease, Benjamin W
Koeritz, Eric J
Soldat, Douglas J
Stier, John C
description Nitrogen source and rate effects on velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.; VBG) putting greens are not well documented, particularly in the north central United States which has different conditions than areas where VBG is normally grown. Acidic soil pH is perceived as necessary for VBG; in nonacidic soils, acidifying fertilizers may provide better VBG quality than less or nonacidic fertilizers. We wanted to determine the effects of N sources representing a range of acidity and N rates (49, 146, 244 kg ha−1 yr−1) on VBG agronomic and playability characteristics when grown on alkaline soils. Fertilizer treatments were applied at 2-wk intervals to ‘Vesper’ VBG putting greens using liquid forms of ammonium sulfate, urea, ammonium nitrate, and calcium nitrate. Separate trials were conducted on two root zones: an 80:20 sand/peat mixture (pH 7.8) and a Troxel silt loam (pH 7.0). Nitrogen source usually had negligible effects on turf characteristics, though occasionally calcium nitrate resulted in poorer quality or shoot density than other sources. Clipping yield, shoot density, and relative chlorophyll index increased, and ball roll distances decreased, as N rate increased. On sand, not even the 244 kg ha−1 yr−1 rate of N guaranteed acceptable turf quality. On silt loam, 146 kg ha−1 N yr−1 usually provided acceptable turf quality, though quality was occasionally improved at 244 kg ha−1 N yr−1 Velvet bentgrass suffered from mid-summer stress alleviated by higher rather than lower quantities of N fertilizer.
doi_str_mv 10.2135/cropsci2010.05.0246
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_849281670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2257720331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-3987cecdda68a3590e16ebefa66047bc02407b0733c50057596ef659745809373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUEtLAzEQDqJgffwCDwbB4-pkZ5PsHnWpVRAVq-ItpOmkrNTdmmwV_70pLeLR08DM95qPsSMBZ7lAee5Ct4iuySEtQJ5BXqgtNhAFygyUxG02ABAiEyW-7rK9GN8AQFdaDtjorulDN6OWj7tlcMRtO-WPtic-9J5cH3nX8heaf1LPL6ntZ8HGyB-Wfd-0Mz4KlJhPy-AP2I6380iHm7nPnq-GT_V1dns_uqkvbjOHOaoMq1I7ctOpVaVFWQEJRRPyViko9MSl5KAnoBGdBJBaVoq8kpUuZAkVatxnJ2vdReg-lhR785Zyt8nSlEWVl0JpSCBcg1IvMQbyZhGadxu-jQCzKsz8KcyANKvCEut0I22js3MfbOua-EvNUQsoC5FwV2vcVzOn7_9Im3pc5_Xj_cO4vlntQW4Mj9dC3nbGzkIyex6nO4KoMD0j8QcQBYlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>849281670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen Source and Rate Effects on Velvet Bentgrass Putting Green Turf</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Pease, Benjamin W ; Koeritz, Eric J ; Soldat, Douglas J ; Stier, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Pease, Benjamin W ; Koeritz, Eric J ; Soldat, Douglas J ; Stier, John C</creatorcontrib><description>Nitrogen source and rate effects on velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.; VBG) putting greens are not well documented, particularly in the north central United States which has different conditions than areas where VBG is normally grown. Acidic soil pH is perceived as necessary for VBG; in nonacidic soils, acidifying fertilizers may provide better VBG quality than less or nonacidic fertilizers. We wanted to determine the effects of N sources representing a range of acidity and N rates (49, 146, 244 kg ha−1 yr−1) on VBG agronomic and playability characteristics when grown on alkaline soils. Fertilizer treatments were applied at 2-wk intervals to ‘Vesper’ VBG putting greens using liquid forms of ammonium sulfate, urea, ammonium nitrate, and calcium nitrate. Separate trials were conducted on two root zones: an 80:20 sand/peat mixture (pH 7.8) and a Troxel silt loam (pH 7.0). Nitrogen source usually had negligible effects on turf characteristics, though occasionally calcium nitrate resulted in poorer quality or shoot density than other sources. Clipping yield, shoot density, and relative chlorophyll index increased, and ball roll distances decreased, as N rate increased. On sand, not even the 244 kg ha−1 yr−1 rate of N guaranteed acceptable turf quality. On silt loam, 146 kg ha−1 N yr−1 usually provided acceptable turf quality, though quality was occasionally improved at 244 kg ha−1 N yr−1 Velvet bentgrass suffered from mid-summer stress alleviated by higher rather than lower quantities of N fertilizer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.05.0246</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>acid soils ; Acidic soils ; acidifying fertilizers ; Acidity ; agronomic traits ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Agrostis canina ; Alkaline soils ; Ammonium ; Ammonium nitrate ; ammonium sulfate ; ball roll distances ; Biological and medical sciences ; Calcium ; calcium nitrate ; chlorophyll ; Cultivars ; dry matter accumulation ; fertilizer rates ; Fertilizers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; golf courses ; Grasses ; Life sciences ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen fertilizers ; Peat ; plant density ; playability characteristics ; putting greens ; Sand ; Silt loam ; silt loam soils ; Soil fertility ; Soil pH ; Soils ; Turf ; turf grasses ; turf management ; turf quality ; Turfgrasses ; Urea</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2011, Vol.51 (1), p.342-352</ispartof><rights>Crop Science Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-3987cecdda68a3590e16ebefa66047bc02407b0733c50057596ef659745809373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-3987cecdda68a3590e16ebefa66047bc02407b0733c50057596ef659745809373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23710841$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pease, Benjamin W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koeritz, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldat, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stier, John C</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen Source and Rate Effects on Velvet Bentgrass Putting Green Turf</title><title>Crop science</title><description>Nitrogen source and rate effects on velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.; VBG) putting greens are not well documented, particularly in the north central United States which has different conditions than areas where VBG is normally grown. Acidic soil pH is perceived as necessary for VBG; in nonacidic soils, acidifying fertilizers may provide better VBG quality than less or nonacidic fertilizers. We wanted to determine the effects of N sources representing a range of acidity and N rates (49, 146, 244 kg ha−1 yr−1) on VBG agronomic and playability characteristics when grown on alkaline soils. Fertilizer treatments were applied at 2-wk intervals to ‘Vesper’ VBG putting greens using liquid forms of ammonium sulfate, urea, ammonium nitrate, and calcium nitrate. Separate trials were conducted on two root zones: an 80:20 sand/peat mixture (pH 7.8) and a Troxel silt loam (pH 7.0). Nitrogen source usually had negligible effects on turf characteristics, though occasionally calcium nitrate resulted in poorer quality or shoot density than other sources. Clipping yield, shoot density, and relative chlorophyll index increased, and ball roll distances decreased, as N rate increased. On sand, not even the 244 kg ha−1 yr−1 rate of N guaranteed acceptable turf quality. On silt loam, 146 kg ha−1 N yr−1 usually provided acceptable turf quality, though quality was occasionally improved at 244 kg ha−1 N yr−1 Velvet bentgrass suffered from mid-summer stress alleviated by higher rather than lower quantities of N fertilizer.</description><subject>acid soils</subject><subject>Acidic soils</subject><subject>acidifying fertilizers</subject><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>agronomic traits</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Agrostis canina</subject><subject>Alkaline soils</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium nitrate</subject><subject>ammonium sulfate</subject><subject>ball roll distances</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>calcium nitrate</subject><subject>chlorophyll</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>dry matter accumulation</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>golf courses</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>plant density</subject><subject>playability characteristics</subject><subject>putting greens</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Silt loam</subject><subject>silt loam soils</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Turf</subject><subject>turf grasses</subject><subject>turf management</subject><subject>turf quality</subject><subject>Turfgrasses</subject><subject>Urea</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUEtLAzEQDqJgffwCDwbB4-pkZ5PsHnWpVRAVq-ItpOmkrNTdmmwV_70pLeLR08DM95qPsSMBZ7lAee5Ct4iuySEtQJ5BXqgtNhAFygyUxG02ABAiEyW-7rK9GN8AQFdaDtjorulDN6OWj7tlcMRtO-WPtic-9J5cH3nX8heaf1LPL6ntZ8HGyB-Wfd-0Mz4KlJhPy-AP2I6380iHm7nPnq-GT_V1dns_uqkvbjOHOaoMq1I7ctOpVaVFWQEJRRPyViko9MSl5KAnoBGdBJBaVoq8kpUuZAkVatxnJ2vdReg-lhR785Zyt8nSlEWVl0JpSCBcg1IvMQbyZhGadxu-jQCzKsz8KcyANKvCEut0I22js3MfbOua-EvNUQsoC5FwV2vcVzOn7_9Im3pc5_Xj_cO4vlntQW4Mj9dC3nbGzkIyex6nO4KoMD0j8QcQBYlQ</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Pease, Benjamin W</creator><creator>Koeritz, Eric J</creator><creator>Soldat, Douglas J</creator><creator>Stier, John C</creator><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Nitrogen Source and Rate Effects on Velvet Bentgrass Putting Green Turf</title><author>Pease, Benjamin W ; Koeritz, Eric J ; Soldat, Douglas J ; Stier, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-3987cecdda68a3590e16ebefa66047bc02407b0733c50057596ef659745809373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>acid soils</topic><topic>Acidic soils</topic><topic>acidifying fertilizers</topic><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>agronomic traits</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Agrostis canina</topic><topic>Alkaline soils</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium nitrate</topic><topic>ammonium sulfate</topic><topic>ball roll distances</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>calcium nitrate</topic><topic>chlorophyll</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>dry matter accumulation</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>golf courses</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>plant density</topic><topic>playability characteristics</topic><topic>putting greens</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Silt loam</topic><topic>silt loam soils</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Turf</topic><topic>turf grasses</topic><topic>turf management</topic><topic>turf quality</topic><topic>Turfgrasses</topic><topic>Urea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pease, Benjamin W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koeritz, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldat, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stier, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pease, Benjamin W</au><au>Koeritz, Eric J</au><au>Soldat, Douglas J</au><au>Stier, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen Source and Rate Effects on Velvet Bentgrass Putting Green Turf</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>342-352</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>Nitrogen source and rate effects on velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.; VBG) putting greens are not well documented, particularly in the north central United States which has different conditions than areas where VBG is normally grown. Acidic soil pH is perceived as necessary for VBG; in nonacidic soils, acidifying fertilizers may provide better VBG quality than less or nonacidic fertilizers. We wanted to determine the effects of N sources representing a range of acidity and N rates (49, 146, 244 kg ha−1 yr−1) on VBG agronomic and playability characteristics when grown on alkaline soils. Fertilizer treatments were applied at 2-wk intervals to ‘Vesper’ VBG putting greens using liquid forms of ammonium sulfate, urea, ammonium nitrate, and calcium nitrate. Separate trials were conducted on two root zones: an 80:20 sand/peat mixture (pH 7.8) and a Troxel silt loam (pH 7.0). Nitrogen source usually had negligible effects on turf characteristics, though occasionally calcium nitrate resulted in poorer quality or shoot density than other sources. Clipping yield, shoot density, and relative chlorophyll index increased, and ball roll distances decreased, as N rate increased. On sand, not even the 244 kg ha−1 yr−1 rate of N guaranteed acceptable turf quality. On silt loam, 146 kg ha−1 N yr−1 usually provided acceptable turf quality, though quality was occasionally improved at 244 kg ha−1 N yr−1 Velvet bentgrass suffered from mid-summer stress alleviated by higher rather than lower quantities of N fertilizer.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2010.05.0246</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-183X
ispartof Crop science, 2011, Vol.51 (1), p.342-352
issn 0011-183X
1435-0653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_849281670
source Wiley
subjects acid soils
Acidic soils
acidifying fertilizers
Acidity
agronomic traits
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Agrostis canina
Alkaline soils
Ammonium
Ammonium nitrate
ammonium sulfate
ball roll distances
Biological and medical sciences
Calcium
calcium nitrate
chlorophyll
Cultivars
dry matter accumulation
fertilizer rates
Fertilizers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
golf courses
Grasses
Life sciences
Nitrates
Nitrogen
nitrogen fertilizers
Peat
plant density
playability characteristics
putting greens
Sand
Silt loam
silt loam soils
Soil fertility
Soil pH
Soils
Turf
turf grasses
turf management
turf quality
Turfgrasses
Urea
title Nitrogen Source and Rate Effects on Velvet Bentgrass Putting Green Turf
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A11%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20Source%20and%20Rate%20Effects%20on%20Velvet%20Bentgrass%20Putting%20Green%20Turf&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Pease,%20Benjamin%20W&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=342-352&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2010.05.0246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2257720331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-3987cecdda68a3590e16ebefa66047bc02407b0733c50057596ef659745809373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=849281670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true