Loading…

Antiemetics in children receiving chemotherapy. MASCC/ESMO guideline update 2009

Only a few studies have been carried out in children on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). 5-HT 3 receptor antagonists have been shown to be more efficacious and less toxic than metoclopramide, phenothiazines and cannabinoids. Most dose studies are available for the 5...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2011-03, Vol.19 (Suppl 1), p.37-42
Main Authors: Jordan, Karin, Roila, Fausto, Molassiotis, Alexander, Maranzano, Ernesto, Clark-Snow, Rebecca A., Feyer, Petra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Only a few studies have been carried out in children on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). 5-HT 3 receptor antagonists have been shown to be more efficacious and less toxic than metoclopramide, phenothiazines and cannabinoids. Most dose studies are available for the 5-HT 3 receptor antagonists ondansetron and granisetron. The new 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist palonosetron was evaluated in one comparative study so far showing promising activity. Combinations of a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone showed increased efficacy with respect to a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist alone. All paediatric patients receiving chemotherapy of high or moderate emetogenic potential should receive a combination of a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone to prevent acute emesis. No studies have specifically evaluated antiemetic drugs in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced delayed and anticipatory emesis in children. The role of the NK1 receptor antagonists in children has to be further investigated, although one small study is published so far, showing promising activity in the prevention of CINV with aprepitant. The new proposed guideline from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the European Society of Clinical Oncology summarises the updated data from the literature and takes into consideration the existing guidelines.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-010-0994-7