Loading…

The Effect of Ignoring Classroom-Level Variance in Estimating the Generalizability of School Mean Scores

Contemporary educational accountability systems, including state‐level systems prescribed under No Child Left Behind as well as those envisioned under the “Race to the Top” comprehensive assessment competition, rely on school‐level summaries of student test scores. The precision of these score summa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational measurement, issues and practice issues and practice, 2011-03, Vol.30 (1), p.13-22
Main Authors: Wei, Xin, Haertel, Edward
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2656-1eac8db9bd857b195e2331788ef1cfc6ba7cfb3efdb1cb5dd374e51abb6e74b93
cites
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Educational measurement, issues and practice
container_volume 30
creator Wei, Xin
Haertel, Edward
description Contemporary educational accountability systems, including state‐level systems prescribed under No Child Left Behind as well as those envisioned under the “Race to the Top” comprehensive assessment competition, rely on school‐level summaries of student test scores. The precision of these score summaries is almost always evaluated using models that ignore the classroom‐level clustering of students within schools. This paper reports balanced and unbalanced generalizability analyses investigating the consequences of ignoring variation at the level of classrooms within schools when analyzing the reliability of such school‐level accountability measures. Results show that the reliability of school means cannot be determined accurately when classroom‐level effects are ignored. Failure to take between‐classroom variance into account biases generalizability (G) coefficient estimates downward and standard errors (SEs) upward if classroom‐level effects are regarded as fixed, and biases G‐coefficient estimates upward and SEs downward if they are regarded as random. These biases become more severe as the difference between the school‐level intraclass correlation (ICC) and the class‐level ICC increases. School‐accountability systems should be designed so that classroom (or teacher) level variation can be taken into consideration when quantifying the precision of school rankings, and statistical models for school mean score reliability should incorporate this information.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00196.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_863802455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ927921</ericid><sourcerecordid>2331958411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2656-1eac8db9bd857b195e2331788ef1cfc6ba7cfb3efdb1cb5dd374e51abb6e74b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9P4zAQxa3VIm0X9hvswdp7ShzXcXzYA1uFUtQA0vJH2otlOxPqEuJip9Dy6XHoqnOZ0bz3xvIPIUzSMYl1uhoTPmEJFSIbZ2ncpikR-Xj7BY0Owlc0SjklybD4hr6HsIomlgs-QsvbJeCyacD02DV4_tg5b7tHPG1VCN6552QBr9Die-Wt6gxg2-Ey9PZZ9YOtj-kZdOBVa9-Vtq3td8Odv2bpXIsrUF2cnYdwgo4a1Qb48b8fo7vz8nZ6kSyuZ_Pp2SIxWc7yhIAyRa2FrgvGNREMMkoJLwpoiGlMrhU3jabQ1JoYzeqa8gkworTOgU-0oMfo1_7u2ruXDYRertzGd_FJWeS0SLMJY9H0c28Cb41c-_gdv5Plpci4yEiUf-_lN9vC7qCTVA7I5UoOIOVAVg7I5SdyuZVlNb-JU8wn-7wNPWwPeeWfZM4pZ_Lhaib_FPcku6oq-Y9-ACpRhuk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863802455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Ignoring Classroom-Level Variance in Estimating the Generalizability of School Mean Scores</title><source>Wiley</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Wei, Xin ; Haertel, Edward</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xin ; Haertel, Edward</creatorcontrib><description>Contemporary educational accountability systems, including state‐level systems prescribed under No Child Left Behind as well as those envisioned under the “Race to the Top” comprehensive assessment competition, rely on school‐level summaries of student test scores. The precision of these score summaries is almost always evaluated using models that ignore the classroom‐level clustering of students within schools. This paper reports balanced and unbalanced generalizability analyses investigating the consequences of ignoring variation at the level of classrooms within schools when analyzing the reliability of such school‐level accountability measures. Results show that the reliability of school means cannot be determined accurately when classroom‐level effects are ignored. Failure to take between‐classroom variance into account biases generalizability (G) coefficient estimates downward and standard errors (SEs) upward if classroom‐level effects are regarded as fixed, and biases G‐coefficient estimates upward and SEs downward if they are regarded as random. These biases become more severe as the difference between the school‐level intraclass correlation (ICC) and the class‐level ICC increases. School‐accountability systems should be designed so that classroom (or teacher) level variation can be taken into consideration when quantifying the precision of school rankings, and statistical models for school mean score reliability should incorporate this information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00196.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Classroom management ; Classrooms ; Computation ; Correlation ; Educational evaluation ; Error of Measurement ; Federal Legislation ; Generalizability Theory ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US ; Reliability ; school-level scores ; Schools ; Scores ; Statistical Bias ; Students</subject><ispartof>Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2011-03, Vol.30 (1), p.13-22</ispartof><rights>2011 by the National Council on Measurement in Education</rights><rights>Copyright National Council on Measurement in Education Spring 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2656-1eac8db9bd857b195e2331788ef1cfc6ba7cfb3efdb1cb5dd374e51abb6e74b93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ927921$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haertel, Edward</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Ignoring Classroom-Level Variance in Estimating the Generalizability of School Mean Scores</title><title>Educational measurement, issues and practice</title><description>Contemporary educational accountability systems, including state‐level systems prescribed under No Child Left Behind as well as those envisioned under the “Race to the Top” comprehensive assessment competition, rely on school‐level summaries of student test scores. The precision of these score summaries is almost always evaluated using models that ignore the classroom‐level clustering of students within schools. This paper reports balanced and unbalanced generalizability analyses investigating the consequences of ignoring variation at the level of classrooms within schools when analyzing the reliability of such school‐level accountability measures. Results show that the reliability of school means cannot be determined accurately when classroom‐level effects are ignored. Failure to take between‐classroom variance into account biases generalizability (G) coefficient estimates downward and standard errors (SEs) upward if classroom‐level effects are regarded as fixed, and biases G‐coefficient estimates upward and SEs downward if they are regarded as random. These biases become more severe as the difference between the school‐level intraclass correlation (ICC) and the class‐level ICC increases. School‐accountability systems should be designed so that classroom (or teacher) level variation can be taken into consideration when quantifying the precision of school rankings, and statistical models for school mean score reliability should incorporate this information.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Classroom management</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Error of Measurement</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Generalizability Theory</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>school-level scores</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Statistical Bias</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0731-1745</issn><issn>1745-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9P4zAQxa3VIm0X9hvswdp7ShzXcXzYA1uFUtQA0vJH2otlOxPqEuJip9Dy6XHoqnOZ0bz3xvIPIUzSMYl1uhoTPmEJFSIbZ2ncpikR-Xj7BY0Owlc0SjklybD4hr6HsIomlgs-QsvbJeCyacD02DV4_tg5b7tHPG1VCN6552QBr9Die-Wt6gxg2-Ey9PZZ9YOtj-kZdOBVa9-Vtq3td8Odv2bpXIsrUF2cnYdwgo4a1Qb48b8fo7vz8nZ6kSyuZ_Pp2SIxWc7yhIAyRa2FrgvGNREMMkoJLwpoiGlMrhU3jabQ1JoYzeqa8gkworTOgU-0oMfo1_7u2ruXDYRertzGd_FJWeS0SLMJY9H0c28Cb41c-_gdv5Plpci4yEiUf-_lN9vC7qCTVA7I5UoOIOVAVg7I5SdyuZVlNb-JU8wn-7wNPWwPeeWfZM4pZ_Lhaib_FPcku6oq-Y9-ACpRhuk</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Wei, Xin</creator><creator>Haertel, Edward</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>The Effect of Ignoring Classroom-Level Variance in Estimating the Generalizability of School Mean Scores</title><author>Wei, Xin ; Haertel, Edward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2656-1eac8db9bd857b195e2331788ef1cfc6ba7cfb3efdb1cb5dd374e51abb6e74b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Classroom management</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Error of Measurement</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Generalizability Theory</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>school-level scores</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Statistical Bias</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haertel, Edward</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Xin</au><au>Haertel, Edward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ927921</ericid><atitle>The Effect of Ignoring Classroom-Level Variance in Estimating the Generalizability of School Mean Scores</atitle><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>13-22</pages><issn>0731-1745</issn><eissn>1745-3992</eissn><abstract>Contemporary educational accountability systems, including state‐level systems prescribed under No Child Left Behind as well as those envisioned under the “Race to the Top” comprehensive assessment competition, rely on school‐level summaries of student test scores. The precision of these score summaries is almost always evaluated using models that ignore the classroom‐level clustering of students within schools. This paper reports balanced and unbalanced generalizability analyses investigating the consequences of ignoring variation at the level of classrooms within schools when analyzing the reliability of such school‐level accountability measures. Results show that the reliability of school means cannot be determined accurately when classroom‐level effects are ignored. Failure to take between‐classroom variance into account biases generalizability (G) coefficient estimates downward and standard errors (SEs) upward if classroom‐level effects are regarded as fixed, and biases G‐coefficient estimates upward and SEs downward if they are regarded as random. These biases become more severe as the difference between the school‐level intraclass correlation (ICC) and the class‐level ICC increases. School‐accountability systems should be designed so that classroom (or teacher) level variation can be taken into consideration when quantifying the precision of school rankings, and statistical models for school mean score reliability should incorporate this information.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00196.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-1745
ispartof Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2011-03, Vol.30 (1), p.13-22
issn 0731-1745
1745-3992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_863802455
source Wiley; ERIC
subjects Accountability
Classroom management
Classrooms
Computation
Correlation
Educational evaluation
Error of Measurement
Federal Legislation
Generalizability Theory
No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US
Reliability
school-level scores
Schools
Scores
Statistical Bias
Students
title The Effect of Ignoring Classroom-Level Variance in Estimating the Generalizability of School Mean Scores
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T22%3A49%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Ignoring%20Classroom-Level%20Variance%20in%20Estimating%20the%20Generalizability%20of%20School%20Mean%20Scores&rft.jtitle=Educational%20measurement,%20issues%20and%20practice&rft.au=Wei,%20Xin&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=13-22&rft.issn=0731-1745&rft.eissn=1745-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00196.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2331958411%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2656-1eac8db9bd857b195e2331788ef1cfc6ba7cfb3efdb1cb5dd374e51abb6e74b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863802455&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ927921&rfr_iscdi=true