Loading…
Foliar Nitrogen Uptake Following Urea Application to Putting Green Turfgrass Species
Foliar fertilization often comprises a significant portion of the total annual N applied to putting greens. This study was initiated to evaluate the efficiency of this practice under field conditions. 15N-labeled urea was used to quantify seasonal uptake of foliar-applied N by creeping bentgrass (Ag...
Saved in:
Published in: | Crop science 2011-05, Vol.51 (3), p.1253-1260 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fbeacc904276617bf58cb9336581b30a0bae372fefd4ee0b7ea5d7c3ea8b710f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fbeacc904276617bf58cb9336581b30a0bae372fefd4ee0b7ea5d7c3ea8b710f3 |
container_end_page | 1260 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1253 |
container_title | Crop science |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Stiegler, J. Chris Richardson, Michael D Karcher, Douglas E |
description | Foliar fertilization often comprises a significant portion of the total annual N applied to putting greens. This study was initiated to evaluate the efficiency of this practice under field conditions. 15N-labeled urea was used to quantify seasonal uptake of foliar-applied N by creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera var. L. palustris (Huds.) Farw. ‘Penn A1’) and hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt Davy ‘Tifeagle’) managed as putting greens. Urea was spray-applied monthly, May through September, at rates of 0.5 and 1.25 g N m−2 Both species absorbed urea rapidly, with 24 to 67% of the fertilizer N entering the foliage within 1 h following treatment; peak foliar absorption was generally observed at 4 h after treatment. Percentage of foliar uptake was significantly reduced at higher application rates for both species. In addition, absorption of urea-N by foliage of both species was affected by month of application and year. When averaged across all sampling times and N rates, foliar absorption percentages were similar between the two species, ranging from 36 to 69% for creeping bentgrass and 38 to 62% for bermudagrass. Overall, foliar absorption efficiency was variable and there were no consistent seasonal trends associated with these differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2010.06.0377 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_865642636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2342261721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fbeacc904276617bf58cb9336581b30a0bae372fefd4ee0b7ea5d7c3ea8b710f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1LAzEQXURBrf4CDy6Cx-psskm2R1msCmLFtucwGyclum7WZIv4701pEY-eZnjzPuBNlp0VcMUKLq5N8H00jkECQF4BV2ovOypKLsYgBd__sx9mxzG-AYCaKHGULaa-dRjyJzcEv6IuX_YDvlOe4NZ_uW6VLwNhftP3rTM4ON_lg8-f18Owud0FSpLFOthVwBjzeU_GUTzJDiy2kU53c5Qtp7eL-n78OLt7qG8ex4ZPuBrbhtCYCZRMSVmoxorKNBPOpaiKhgNCg8QVs2RfSyJoFKF4VYYTVo0qwPJRdrH17YP_XFMc9Jtfhy5F6koKWTLJZSLxLSmVFGMgq_vgPjB86wL0pj39pz0NUm_aS6rLnTVGg60N2BkXf6WsLDirKki86Zb35Vr6_o-1ruc1q19mz_P6YYOD3AWeb40seo2rkMKW83QX6VWClQr4D2IJkKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>865642636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foliar Nitrogen Uptake Following Urea Application to Putting Green Turfgrass Species</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Stiegler, J. Chris ; Richardson, Michael D ; Karcher, Douglas E</creator><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, J. Chris ; Richardson, Michael D ; Karcher, Douglas E</creatorcontrib><description>Foliar fertilization often comprises a significant portion of the total annual N applied to putting greens. This study was initiated to evaluate the efficiency of this practice under field conditions. 15N-labeled urea was used to quantify seasonal uptake of foliar-applied N by creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera var. L. palustris (Huds.) Farw. ‘Penn A1’) and hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt Davy ‘Tifeagle’) managed as putting greens. Urea was spray-applied monthly, May through September, at rates of 0.5 and 1.25 g N m−2 Both species absorbed urea rapidly, with 24 to 67% of the fertilizer N entering the foliage within 1 h following treatment; peak foliar absorption was generally observed at 4 h after treatment. Percentage of foliar uptake was significantly reduced at higher application rates for both species. In addition, absorption of urea-N by foliage of both species was affected by month of application and year. When averaged across all sampling times and N rates, foliar absorption percentages were similar between the two species, ranging from 36 to 69% for creeping bentgrass and 38 to 62% for bermudagrass. Overall, foliar absorption efficiency was variable and there were no consistent seasonal trends associated with these differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.06.0377</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Agrostis stolonifera ; application rate ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cynodon dactylon ; Efficiency ; Fertilizers ; Foliage ; foliar uptake ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; golf courses ; hybrids ; leaves ; nitrogen ; nitrogen fertilizers ; R&D ; Research & development ; Studies ; turf grasses ; Turfgrasses ; Urea ; urea nitrogen</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2011-05, Vol.51 (3), p.1253-1260</ispartof><rights>Crop Science Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fbeacc904276617bf58cb9336581b30a0bae372fefd4ee0b7ea5d7c3ea8b710f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fbeacc904276617bf58cb9336581b30a0bae372fefd4ee0b7ea5d7c3ea8b710f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24132880$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, J. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, Douglas E</creatorcontrib><title>Foliar Nitrogen Uptake Following Urea Application to Putting Green Turfgrass Species</title><title>Crop science</title><description>Foliar fertilization often comprises a significant portion of the total annual N applied to putting greens. This study was initiated to evaluate the efficiency of this practice under field conditions. 15N-labeled urea was used to quantify seasonal uptake of foliar-applied N by creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera var. L. palustris (Huds.) Farw. ‘Penn A1’) and hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt Davy ‘Tifeagle’) managed as putting greens. Urea was spray-applied monthly, May through September, at rates of 0.5 and 1.25 g N m−2 Both species absorbed urea rapidly, with 24 to 67% of the fertilizer N entering the foliage within 1 h following treatment; peak foliar absorption was generally observed at 4 h after treatment. Percentage of foliar uptake was significantly reduced at higher application rates for both species. In addition, absorption of urea-N by foliage of both species was affected by month of application and year. When averaged across all sampling times and N rates, foliar absorption percentages were similar between the two species, ranging from 36 to 69% for creeping bentgrass and 38 to 62% for bermudagrass. Overall, foliar absorption efficiency was variable and there were no consistent seasonal trends associated with these differences.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Agrostis stolonifera</subject><subject>application rate</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cynodon dactylon</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Foliage</subject><subject>foliar uptake</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>golf courses</subject><subject>hybrids</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>turf grasses</subject><subject>Turfgrasses</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>urea nitrogen</subject><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1LAzEQXURBrf4CDy6Cx-psskm2R1msCmLFtucwGyclum7WZIv4701pEY-eZnjzPuBNlp0VcMUKLq5N8H00jkECQF4BV2ovOypKLsYgBd__sx9mxzG-AYCaKHGULaa-dRjyJzcEv6IuX_YDvlOe4NZ_uW6VLwNhftP3rTM4ON_lg8-f18Owud0FSpLFOthVwBjzeU_GUTzJDiy2kU53c5Qtp7eL-n78OLt7qG8ex4ZPuBrbhtCYCZRMSVmoxorKNBPOpaiKhgNCg8QVs2RfSyJoFKF4VYYTVo0qwPJRdrH17YP_XFMc9Jtfhy5F6koKWTLJZSLxLSmVFGMgq_vgPjB86wL0pj39pz0NUm_aS6rLnTVGg60N2BkXf6WsLDirKki86Zb35Vr6_o-1ruc1q19mz_P6YYOD3AWeb40seo2rkMKW83QX6VWClQr4D2IJkKc</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Stiegler, J. Chris</creator><creator>Richardson, Michael D</creator><creator>Karcher, Douglas E</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Foliar Nitrogen Uptake Following Urea Application to Putting Green Turfgrass Species</title><author>Stiegler, J. Chris ; Richardson, Michael D ; Karcher, Douglas E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fbeacc904276617bf58cb9336581b30a0bae372fefd4ee0b7ea5d7c3ea8b710f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Agrostis stolonifera</topic><topic>application rate</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cynodon dactylon</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Foliage</topic><topic>foliar uptake</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>golf courses</topic><topic>hybrids</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>turf grasses</topic><topic>Turfgrasses</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>urea nitrogen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stiegler, J. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, Douglas E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stiegler, J. Chris</au><au>Richardson, Michael D</au><au>Karcher, Douglas E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foliar Nitrogen Uptake Following Urea Application to Putting Green Turfgrass Species</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1253</spage><epage>1260</epage><pages>1253-1260</pages><issn>1435-0653</issn><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>Foliar fertilization often comprises a significant portion of the total annual N applied to putting greens. This study was initiated to evaluate the efficiency of this practice under field conditions. 15N-labeled urea was used to quantify seasonal uptake of foliar-applied N by creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera var. L. palustris (Huds.) Farw. ‘Penn A1’) and hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt Davy ‘Tifeagle’) managed as putting greens. Urea was spray-applied monthly, May through September, at rates of 0.5 and 1.25 g N m−2 Both species absorbed urea rapidly, with 24 to 67% of the fertilizer N entering the foliage within 1 h following treatment; peak foliar absorption was generally observed at 4 h after treatment. Percentage of foliar uptake was significantly reduced at higher application rates for both species. In addition, absorption of urea-N by foliage of both species was affected by month of application and year. When averaged across all sampling times and N rates, foliar absorption percentages were similar between the two species, ranging from 36 to 69% for creeping bentgrass and 38 to 62% for bermudagrass. Overall, foliar absorption efficiency was variable and there were no consistent seasonal trends associated with these differences.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2010.06.0377</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-0653 |
ispartof | Crop science, 2011-05, Vol.51 (3), p.1253-1260 |
issn | 1435-0653 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_865642636 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Absorption Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Agrostis stolonifera application rate Biological and medical sciences Cynodon dactylon Efficiency Fertilizers Foliage foliar uptake Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology golf courses hybrids leaves nitrogen nitrogen fertilizers R&D Research & development Studies turf grasses Turfgrasses Urea urea nitrogen |
title | Foliar Nitrogen Uptake Following Urea Application to Putting Green Turfgrass Species |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A57%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foliar%20Nitrogen%20Uptake%20Following%20Urea%20Application%20to%20Putting%20Green%20Turfgrass%20Species&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Stiegler,%20J.%20Chris&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1253&rft.epage=1260&rft.pages=1253-1260&rft.issn=1435-0653&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2010.06.0377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2342261721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fbeacc904276617bf58cb9336581b30a0bae372fefd4ee0b7ea5d7c3ea8b710f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=865642636&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |