Loading…
Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)
A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophon...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of systematic palaeontology 2010-12, Vol.8 (4), p.607-625 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3 |
container_end_page | 625 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | Journal of systematic palaeontology |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Cisneros, Juan Carlos Ruta, Marcello |
description | A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14772019.2010.491986 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_867038786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2349459871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhSMEEqXwDzhEnOCQ4i1euCBUsUlFINS7NVncukrjYKeg_HtcAlcuM6PR996MXpKcYzTDSKJrzIQgCKtZLGjGFFaSHySTuJYZUgwf_swi2zPHyUkIG4QIZrmYJO8vzndr17iVLaFJK_tZ-2D7IYW2SgvrVrVbeejWQ-pM2nlXRjTyra1Cenm3ba3r4SZ9Aw--7nrbWLg6TY4MNKE---3TZPlwv5w_ZYvXx-f53SIDmos-A8kQ55QRCpyVHAlCpUF5TqREtJCFYVIZQquC8QKVgihFJcJEKgDGakOnycVoG7_62NWh1xu38228qCUXiEoheYTYCJXeheBroztvt-AHjZHeZ6f_stP77PSYXZTdjjLbGue38OV8U-kehsZ546EtbdD0X4dvpEd0rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867038786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Cisneros, Juan Carlos ; Ruta, Marcello</creator><creatorcontrib>Cisneros, Juan Carlos ; Ruta, Marcello</creatorcontrib><description>A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-2019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-0941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2010.491986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>ancestral area ; Biodiversity ; Biogeography ; disparity ; Dispersal ; Endangered & extinct species ; Morphology ; morphospace ; Paleontology ; Phylogeny ; Procolophonidae ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Species ; Taxa ; Triassic</subject><ispartof>Journal of systematic palaeontology, 2010-12, Vol.8 (4), p.607-625</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruta, Marcello</creatorcontrib><title>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</title><title>Journal of systematic palaeontology</title><description>A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade.</description><subject>ancestral area</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>disparity</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>morphospace</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Procolophonidae</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Triassic</subject><issn>1477-2019</issn><issn>1478-0941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhSMEEqXwDzhEnOCQ4i1euCBUsUlFINS7NVncukrjYKeg_HtcAlcuM6PR996MXpKcYzTDSKJrzIQgCKtZLGjGFFaSHySTuJYZUgwf_swi2zPHyUkIG4QIZrmYJO8vzndr17iVLaFJK_tZ-2D7IYW2SgvrVrVbeejWQ-pM2nlXRjTyra1Cenm3ba3r4SZ9Aw--7nrbWLg6TY4MNKE---3TZPlwv5w_ZYvXx-f53SIDmos-A8kQ55QRCpyVHAlCpUF5TqREtJCFYVIZQquC8QKVgihFJcJEKgDGakOnycVoG7_62NWh1xu38228qCUXiEoheYTYCJXeheBroztvt-AHjZHeZ6f_stP77PSYXZTdjjLbGue38OV8U-kehsZ546EtbdD0X4dvpEd0rg</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Ruta, Marcello</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</title><author>Cisneros, Juan Carlos ; Ruta, Marcello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ancestral area</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>disparity</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>morphospace</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Procolophonidae</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Triassic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruta, Marcello</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of systematic palaeontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</au><au>Ruta, Marcello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of systematic palaeontology</jtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>607-625</pages><issn>1477-2019</issn><eissn>1478-0941</eissn><abstract>A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/14772019.2010.491986</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-2019 |
ispartof | Journal of systematic palaeontology, 2010-12, Vol.8 (4), p.607-625 |
issn | 1477-2019 1478-0941 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_867038786 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | ancestral area Biodiversity Biogeography disparity Dispersal Endangered & extinct species Morphology morphospace Paleontology Phylogeny Procolophonidae Reptiles & amphibians Species Taxa Triassic |
title | Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A55%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphological%20diversity%20and%20biogeography%20of%20procolophonids%20(Amniota:%20Parareptilia)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20systematic%20palaeontology&rft.au=Cisneros,%20Juan%20Carlos&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=607-625&rft.issn=1477-2019&rft.eissn=1478-0941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14772019.2010.491986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2349459871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867038786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |