Loading…

Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)

A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of systematic palaeontology 2010-12, Vol.8 (4), p.607-625
Main Authors: Cisneros, Juan Carlos, Ruta, Marcello
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3
container_end_page 625
container_issue 4
container_start_page 607
container_title Journal of systematic palaeontology
container_volume 8
creator Cisneros, Juan Carlos
Ruta, Marcello
description A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14772019.2010.491986
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_867038786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2349459871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhSMEEqXwDzhEnOCQ4i1euCBUsUlFINS7NVncukrjYKeg_HtcAlcuM6PR996MXpKcYzTDSKJrzIQgCKtZLGjGFFaSHySTuJYZUgwf_swi2zPHyUkIG4QIZrmYJO8vzndr17iVLaFJK_tZ-2D7IYW2SgvrVrVbeejWQ-pM2nlXRjTyra1Cenm3ba3r4SZ9Aw--7nrbWLg6TY4MNKE---3TZPlwv5w_ZYvXx-f53SIDmos-A8kQ55QRCpyVHAlCpUF5TqREtJCFYVIZQquC8QKVgihFJcJEKgDGakOnycVoG7_62NWh1xu38228qCUXiEoheYTYCJXeheBroztvt-AHjZHeZ6f_stP77PSYXZTdjjLbGue38OV8U-kehsZ546EtbdD0X4dvpEd0rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867038786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Cisneros, Juan Carlos ; Ruta, Marcello</creator><creatorcontrib>Cisneros, Juan Carlos ; Ruta, Marcello</creatorcontrib><description>A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-2019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-0941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2010.491986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>ancestral area ; Biodiversity ; Biogeography ; disparity ; Dispersal ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Morphology ; morphospace ; Paleontology ; Phylogeny ; Procolophonidae ; Reptiles &amp; amphibians ; Species ; Taxa ; Triassic</subject><ispartof>Journal of systematic palaeontology, 2010-12, Vol.8 (4), p.607-625</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruta, Marcello</creatorcontrib><title>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</title><title>Journal of systematic palaeontology</title><description>A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade.</description><subject>ancestral area</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>disparity</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>morphospace</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Procolophonidae</subject><subject>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Triassic</subject><issn>1477-2019</issn><issn>1478-0941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhSMEEqXwDzhEnOCQ4i1euCBUsUlFINS7NVncukrjYKeg_HtcAlcuM6PR996MXpKcYzTDSKJrzIQgCKtZLGjGFFaSHySTuJYZUgwf_swi2zPHyUkIG4QIZrmYJO8vzndr17iVLaFJK_tZ-2D7IYW2SgvrVrVbeejWQ-pM2nlXRjTyra1Cenm3ba3r4SZ9Aw--7nrbWLg6TY4MNKE---3TZPlwv5w_ZYvXx-f53SIDmos-A8kQ55QRCpyVHAlCpUF5TqREtJCFYVIZQquC8QKVgihFJcJEKgDGakOnycVoG7_62NWh1xu38228qCUXiEoheYTYCJXeheBroztvt-AHjZHeZ6f_stP77PSYXZTdjjLbGue38OV8U-kehsZ546EtbdD0X4dvpEd0rg</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Ruta, Marcello</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</title><author>Cisneros, Juan Carlos ; Ruta, Marcello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ancestral area</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>disparity</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>morphospace</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Procolophonidae</topic><topic>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Triassic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruta, Marcello</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of systematic palaeontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cisneros, Juan Carlos</au><au>Ruta, Marcello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of systematic palaeontology</jtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>607-625</pages><issn>1477-2019</issn><eissn>1478-0941</eissn><abstract>A recent phylogenetic analysis of procolophonid parareptiles is used as the basis for a study of morphological diversity (disparity) in these amniotes. Disparity values are compared in three groups of procolophonids (a paraphyletic series of basal taxa and two monophyletic sister groups: procolophonines and leptopleuronines), two ecophenotypic assemblages (one based upon inferred diet - non high-fibre versus high-fibre species; the other based upon cranial sculpture - non horned versus horned species), and two temporal assemblages (Lower Triassic versus Middle and Upper Triassic). The mean disparity values are comparable in the case of temporal and ecophenotypic assemblages. High-fibre species are marginally less disparate than non high-fibre species. The combined Middle and Upper Triassic species are slightly less disparate than Lower Triassic species. Finally, horned species are only slightly more disparate than non-horned species. The paraphyletic series of basal taxa and the leptopleuronines show similar disparity values, marginally higher than those for procolophonines. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to reconstruct the biogeographical history of procolophonids. Both ancestral area analysis and dispersal-vicariance analysis show that South Africa was the most likely ancestral area for procolophonids as a whole. North China - either as a single area or in combination with Russia or South Africa - was the most likely ancestral area for the leptopleuronine-procolophonine clade.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/14772019.2010.491986</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-2019
ispartof Journal of systematic palaeontology, 2010-12, Vol.8 (4), p.607-625
issn 1477-2019
1478-0941
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_867038786
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects ancestral area
Biodiversity
Biogeography
disparity
Dispersal
Endangered & extinct species
Morphology
morphospace
Paleontology
Phylogeny
Procolophonidae
Reptiles & amphibians
Species
Taxa
Triassic
title Morphological diversity and biogeography of procolophonids (Amniota: Parareptilia)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A55%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphological%20diversity%20and%20biogeography%20of%20procolophonids%20(Amniota:%20Parareptilia)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20systematic%20palaeontology&rft.au=Cisneros,%20Juan%20Carlos&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=607-625&rft.issn=1477-2019&rft.eissn=1478-0941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14772019.2010.491986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2349459871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-a840663423a64c607238f05528803b8bf489f23db46b0c72993801289aa44ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867038786&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true