DIMENSIONS OF PARTY ELECTORAL PROGRAMMES: SLOVENIAN EXPERIENCE

Mostly we find definitions stating that party programmes are hierarchically the most important written and publically available party documents, in which broad party statements, claims, interpretations, analyses, proposals, recommendations etc. are stated for the purposes of party making.4 Some auth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of comparative politics 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.52-75
Main Authors: Lipicer, Simona Kustec, Kropivnik, Samo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agreements
Elections
Politics
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 52
container_title Journal of comparative politics
container_volume 4
creator Lipicer, Simona Kustec
Kropivnik, Samo
description Mostly we find definitions stating that party programmes are hierarchically the most important written and publically available party documents, in which broad party statements, claims, interpretations, analyses, proposals, recommendations etc. are stated for the purposes of party making.4 Some authors see their importance mainly in the context of effective, efficient and transparent party politics.' Besides the described candidate-centred analytical focus, numerous analyses, as well as theories, suggest that party programmes should be considered more broadly than only as phenomena of party politics.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_869516824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1761479769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p145t-ce83631d336efe3bf1ded0fe6b06e3edfb19c5820e42b0111ada093957da780a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjs1Kw0AYRQdRsNS-w-DKTWC-fJmfuBBCnLaB_JFE0VWYZCZQiW1tmve3qCtX5y4Ol3NFFoCoPEDFr3-29GQg5S1ZTdOuYwH3UTLGFuTpOcl0XidFXtNiTcuoat6pTnXcFFWU0rIqNlWUZbp-pHVavOo8iXKq30pdJTqP9R25Gcw4udUfl-RlrZt466XFJomj1DtCwM9e7xQKBIso3OCwG8A6ywYnOiYcOjt0EPZc-cwFfscAwFjDQgy5tEYqZnBJHn5_j6fD1-ymc_u5m3o3jmbvDvPUghQQyFCK8KLe_1M_DvNpf6lrlQg5COUH-A0NL06L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869516824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DIMENSIONS OF PARTY ELECTORAL PROGRAMMES: SLOVENIAN EXPERIENCE</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Lipicer, Simona Kustec ; Kropivnik, Samo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lipicer, Simona Kustec ; Kropivnik, Samo</creatorcontrib><description>Mostly we find definitions stating that party programmes are hierarchically the most important written and publically available party documents, in which broad party statements, claims, interpretations, analyses, proposals, recommendations etc. are stated for the purposes of party making.4 Some authors see their importance mainly in the context of effective, efficient and transparent party politics.' Besides the described candidate-centred analytical focus, numerous analyses, as well as theories, suggest that party programmes should be considered more broadly than only as phenomena of party politics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1337-7477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1338-1385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Elections ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative politics, 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.52-75</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences Jan 2011</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/869516824/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/869516824?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21387,21394,25753,33223,33224,33611,33985,37012,43733,43948,44590,74093,74340,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lipicer, Simona Kustec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropivnik, Samo</creatorcontrib><title>DIMENSIONS OF PARTY ELECTORAL PROGRAMMES: SLOVENIAN EXPERIENCE</title><title>Journal of comparative politics</title><description>Mostly we find definitions stating that party programmes are hierarchically the most important written and publically available party documents, in which broad party statements, claims, interpretations, analyses, proposals, recommendations etc. are stated for the purposes of party making.4 Some authors see their importance mainly in the context of effective, efficient and transparent party politics.' Besides the described candidate-centred analytical focus, numerous analyses, as well as theories, suggest that party programmes should be considered more broadly than only as phenomena of party politics.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>1337-7477</issn><issn>1338-1385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjs1Kw0AYRQdRsNS-w-DKTWC-fJmfuBBCnLaB_JFE0VWYZCZQiW1tmve3qCtX5y4Ol3NFFoCoPEDFr3-29GQg5S1ZTdOuYwH3UTLGFuTpOcl0XidFXtNiTcuoat6pTnXcFFWU0rIqNlWUZbp-pHVavOo8iXKq30pdJTqP9R25Gcw4udUfl-RlrZt466XFJomj1DtCwM9e7xQKBIso3OCwG8A6ywYnOiYcOjt0EPZc-cwFfscAwFjDQgy5tEYqZnBJHn5_j6fD1-ymc_u5m3o3jmbvDvPUghQQyFCK8KLe_1M_DvNpf6lrlQg5COUH-A0NL06L</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Lipicer, Simona Kustec</creator><creator>Kropivnik, Samo</creator><general>University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>DIMENSIONS OF PARTY ELECTORAL PROGRAMMES: SLOVENIAN EXPERIENCE</title><author>Lipicer, Simona Kustec ; Kropivnik, Samo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p145t-ce83631d336efe3bf1ded0fe6b06e3edfb19c5820e42b0111ada093957da780a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lipicer, Simona Kustec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropivnik, Samo</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lipicer, Simona Kustec</au><au>Kropivnik, Samo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DIMENSIONS OF PARTY ELECTORAL PROGRAMMES: SLOVENIAN EXPERIENCE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative politics</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>52-75</pages><issn>1337-7477</issn><eissn>1338-1385</eissn><abstract>Mostly we find definitions stating that party programmes are hierarchically the most important written and publically available party documents, in which broad party statements, claims, interpretations, analyses, proposals, recommendations etc. are stated for the purposes of party making.4 Some authors see their importance mainly in the context of effective, efficient and transparent party politics.' Besides the described candidate-centred analytical focus, numerous analyses, as well as theories, suggest that party programmes should be considered more broadly than only as phenomena of party politics.</abstract><cop>Ljubljana</cop><pub>University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences</pub><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1337-7477
ispartof Journal of comparative politics, 2011-01, Vol.4 (1), p.52-75
issn 1337-7477
1338-1385
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_869516824
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Agreements
Elections
Politics
title DIMENSIONS OF PARTY ELECTORAL PROGRAMMES: SLOVENIAN EXPERIENCE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A41%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DIMENSIONS%20OF%20PARTY%20ELECTORAL%20PROGRAMMES:%20SLOVENIAN%20EXPERIENCE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20politics&rft.au=Lipicer,%20Simona%20Kustec&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=52-75&rft.issn=1337-7477&rft.eissn=1338-1385&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1761479769%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p145t-ce83631d336efe3bf1ded0fe6b06e3edfb19c5820e42b0111ada093957da780a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869516824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true