Loading…

Comparison of reported nutrients and serve size between private label products and branded products in Australian supermarkets

Aim:  To compare the reported content of key nutrients related to cardiovascular health (energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium) between Private Label and Branded products for various food categories in Australian supermarkets, using Nutrition Information Panel data. Reported serve size was als...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrition & dietetics 2011-06, Vol.68 (2), p.120-126
Main Authors: CLEANTHOUS, Xenia, MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie, ANDERSON, Susan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-f1b7798502fba848fde7d9840af62083650ac7f439af768e0787cb9cb3d76c253
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-f1b7798502fba848fde7d9840af62083650ac7f439af768e0787cb9cb3d76c253
container_end_page 126
container_issue 2
container_start_page 120
container_title Nutrition & dietetics
container_volume 68
creator CLEANTHOUS, Xenia
MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie
ANDERSON, Susan
description Aim:  To compare the reported content of key nutrients related to cardiovascular health (energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium) between Private Label and Branded products for various food categories in Australian supermarkets, using Nutrition Information Panel data. Reported serve size was also assessed. Methods:  A cross‐sectional study using selected Nutrition Information Panel data collected during 2006–2008 for 25 food categories, across 10 Australian supermarkets. Collected data included serve size and nutrients per 100 g: energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium. Differences between Private Label versus Branded products were assessed using independent samples t‐test. Results:  Data were collected for 3204 products; Private Label products accounted for 26% (n = 824). Serve size was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories. Total and saturated fat for Private Label products was significantly greater (than Branded) for five and seven categories, respectively. Sodium was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories, with no consistency in direction. Conclusion:  Differences between Branded and Private Label products were food category specific. The present study provides a first‐time comparison of a comprehensive sample of Branded versus Private Label products, across multiple food categories, in Australia with respect to nutrients related to cardiovascular health. It also provides insight into serve size differences, and may be used as a baseline for future comparisons of nutritional content and serve sizes between Branded and Private Label products, and to monitor the impact of potential new food product developments and reformulations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2011.01511.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_871971315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.201108986</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2375839581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-f1b7798502fba848fde7d9840af62083650ac7f439af768e0787cb9cb3d76c253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMFu3CAUtKpGapr2H1Dv3sJiAz70EG272ShRckiiHJ-w_WjZeo0LONnk0G8vXkd7LofHgzczDJNlhNEFS-vrdsFkIXNKFV0sKWMLyspU9--y0-PgfeqLQuSCC_Uh-xjCllImpRKn2d-V2w3a2-B64gzxODgfsSX9GL3FPgai-5YE9E9Ign1FUmN8RuzJ4O2Tjkg6XWOXTq4dmzd07VNNGsdL25PzMUSvO6t7EsYB_U773xjDp-zE6C7g57f9LHtY_7hfbfLr24vL1fl13hQFY7lhtZSVKunS1FoVyrQo20oVVBuxpIqLkupGmoJX2kihkEolm7pqat5K0SxLfpZ9mXWTpz8jhghbN_o-PQlKskoyziaQmkGNdyF4NJA-mYy-AKMwhQ1bmDKFKVOYwoZD2LBP1G8z9dl2-PLfPLj5fjl1ib-e-X5nI-hBmwi_YhwCtDpqsL1xh4nzP6F1dhLmnAmw2CXwQZOqSokklM9CNkTcH42ktEFILkt4vLmAO7neXG3oHVD-D3zor8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871971315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of reported nutrients and serve size between private label products and branded products in Australian supermarkets</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>CLEANTHOUS, Xenia ; MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie ; ANDERSON, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>CLEANTHOUS, Xenia ; MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie ; ANDERSON, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:  To compare the reported content of key nutrients related to cardiovascular health (energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium) between Private Label and Branded products for various food categories in Australian supermarkets, using Nutrition Information Panel data. Reported serve size was also assessed. Methods:  A cross‐sectional study using selected Nutrition Information Panel data collected during 2006–2008 for 25 food categories, across 10 Australian supermarkets. Collected data included serve size and nutrients per 100 g: energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium. Differences between Private Label versus Branded products were assessed using independent samples t‐test. Results:  Data were collected for 3204 products; Private Label products accounted for 26% (n = 824). Serve size was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories. Total and saturated fat for Private Label products was significantly greater (than Branded) for five and seven categories, respectively. Sodium was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories, with no consistency in direction. Conclusion:  Differences between Branded and Private Label products were food category specific. The present study provides a first‐time comparison of a comprehensive sample of Branded versus Private Label products, across multiple food categories, in Australia with respect to nutrients related to cardiovascular health. It also provides insight into serve size differences, and may be used as a baseline for future comparisons of nutritional content and serve sizes between Branded and Private Label products, and to monitor the impact of potential new food product developments and reformulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1446-6368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2011.01511.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular disease risk factors ; Consumer goods ; Data collection ; Dietetics ; Food ; food composition ; food production/manufacture ; food supply ; nutrient ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Information Panel data ; Packaging ; Retail trade ; Supermarkets</subject><ispartof>Nutrition &amp; dietetics, 2011-06, Vol.68 (2), p.120-126</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Nutrition &amp; Dietetics © 2011 Dietitians Association of Australia</rights><rights>Copyright DIETITIANS ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-f1b7798502fba848fde7d9840af62083650ac7f439af768e0787cb9cb3d76c253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-f1b7798502fba848fde7d9840af62083650ac7f439af768e0787cb9cb3d76c253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CLEANTHOUS, Xenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDERSON, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of reported nutrients and serve size between private label products and branded products in Australian supermarkets</title><title>Nutrition &amp; dietetics</title><description>Aim:  To compare the reported content of key nutrients related to cardiovascular health (energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium) between Private Label and Branded products for various food categories in Australian supermarkets, using Nutrition Information Panel data. Reported serve size was also assessed. Methods:  A cross‐sectional study using selected Nutrition Information Panel data collected during 2006–2008 for 25 food categories, across 10 Australian supermarkets. Collected data included serve size and nutrients per 100 g: energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium. Differences between Private Label versus Branded products were assessed using independent samples t‐test. Results:  Data were collected for 3204 products; Private Label products accounted for 26% (n = 824). Serve size was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories. Total and saturated fat for Private Label products was significantly greater (than Branded) for five and seven categories, respectively. Sodium was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories, with no consistency in direction. Conclusion:  Differences between Branded and Private Label products were food category specific. The present study provides a first‐time comparison of a comprehensive sample of Branded versus Private Label products, across multiple food categories, in Australia with respect to nutrients related to cardiovascular health. It also provides insight into serve size differences, and may be used as a baseline for future comparisons of nutritional content and serve sizes between Branded and Private Label products, and to monitor the impact of potential new food product developments and reformulations.</description><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease risk factors</subject><subject>Consumer goods</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Dietetics</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>food composition</subject><subject>food production/manufacture</subject><subject>food supply</subject><subject>nutrient</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Information Panel data</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Retail trade</subject><subject>Supermarkets</subject><issn>1446-6368</issn><issn>1747-0080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUMFu3CAUtKpGapr2H1Dv3sJiAz70EG272ShRckiiHJ-w_WjZeo0LONnk0G8vXkd7LofHgzczDJNlhNEFS-vrdsFkIXNKFV0sKWMLyspU9--y0-PgfeqLQuSCC_Uh-xjCllImpRKn2d-V2w3a2-B64gzxODgfsSX9GL3FPgai-5YE9E9Ign1FUmN8RuzJ4O2Tjkg6XWOXTq4dmzd07VNNGsdL25PzMUSvO6t7EsYB_U773xjDp-zE6C7g57f9LHtY_7hfbfLr24vL1fl13hQFY7lhtZSVKunS1FoVyrQo20oVVBuxpIqLkupGmoJX2kihkEolm7pqat5K0SxLfpZ9mXWTpz8jhghbN_o-PQlKskoyziaQmkGNdyF4NJA-mYy-AKMwhQ1bmDKFKVOYwoZD2LBP1G8z9dl2-PLfPLj5fjl1ib-e-X5nI-hBmwi_YhwCtDpqsL1xh4nzP6F1dhLmnAmw2CXwQZOqSokklM9CNkTcH42ktEFILkt4vLmAO7neXG3oHVD-D3zor8E</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>CLEANTHOUS, Xenia</creator><creator>MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>ANDERSON, Susan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Comparison of reported nutrients and serve size between private label products and branded products in Australian supermarkets</title><author>CLEANTHOUS, Xenia ; MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie ; ANDERSON, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-f1b7798502fba848fde7d9840af62083650ac7f439af768e0787cb9cb3d76c253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease risk factors</topic><topic>Consumer goods</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Dietetics</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>food composition</topic><topic>food production/manufacture</topic><topic>food supply</topic><topic>nutrient</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Information Panel data</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Retail trade</topic><topic>Supermarkets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CLEANTHOUS, Xenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDERSON, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nutrition &amp; dietetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CLEANTHOUS, Xenia</au><au>MACKINTOSH, Anne-Marie</au><au>ANDERSON, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of reported nutrients and serve size between private label products and branded products in Australian supermarkets</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition &amp; dietetics</jtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>120-126</pages><issn>1446-6368</issn><eissn>1747-0080</eissn><abstract>Aim:  To compare the reported content of key nutrients related to cardiovascular health (energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium) between Private Label and Branded products for various food categories in Australian supermarkets, using Nutrition Information Panel data. Reported serve size was also assessed. Methods:  A cross‐sectional study using selected Nutrition Information Panel data collected during 2006–2008 for 25 food categories, across 10 Australian supermarkets. Collected data included serve size and nutrients per 100 g: energy, total fat, saturated fat and sodium. Differences between Private Label versus Branded products were assessed using independent samples t‐test. Results:  Data were collected for 3204 products; Private Label products accounted for 26% (n = 824). Serve size was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories. Total and saturated fat for Private Label products was significantly greater (than Branded) for five and seven categories, respectively. Sodium was significantly different between Private Label and Branded for seven categories, with no consistency in direction. Conclusion:  Differences between Branded and Private Label products were food category specific. The present study provides a first‐time comparison of a comprehensive sample of Branded versus Private Label products, across multiple food categories, in Australia with respect to nutrients related to cardiovascular health. It also provides insight into serve size differences, and may be used as a baseline for future comparisons of nutritional content and serve sizes between Branded and Private Label products, and to monitor the impact of potential new food product developments and reformulations.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1747-0080.2011.01511.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1446-6368
ispartof Nutrition & dietetics, 2011-06, Vol.68 (2), p.120-126
issn 1446-6368
1747-0080
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_871971315
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks
subjects Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular disease risk factors
Consumer goods
Data collection
Dietetics
Food
food composition
food production/manufacture
food supply
nutrient
Nutrition
Nutrition Information Panel data
Packaging
Retail trade
Supermarkets
title Comparison of reported nutrients and serve size between private label products and branded products in Australian supermarkets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A03%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20reported%20nutrients%20and%20serve%20size%20between%20private%20label%20products%20and%20branded%20products%20in%20Australian%20supermarkets&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20&%20dietetics&rft.au=CLEANTHOUS,%20Xenia&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=120-126&rft.issn=1446-6368&rft.eissn=1747-0080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1747-0080.2011.01511.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2375839581%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-f1b7798502fba848fde7d9840af62083650ac7f439af768e0787cb9cb3d76c253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871971315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.201108986&rfr_iscdi=true