Loading…

Accidents in “normal” operation – Can you see them coming?

Despite the increased understanding of how accidents occur in the chemical process industry, today's safety measures and indicators do not prevent these accidents from occurring. Finding a way to better, proactively, identifying precursors to imminent safety risks, could help organizations to f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2010-03, Vol.23 (2), p.351-366
Main Authors: Sonnemans, P.J.M., Körvers, P.M.W., Pasman, H.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6d1ea769b59897c4db14ff51b7f722b89d95f6cd2f3067c27eb9b8f3d94af7953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6d1ea769b59897c4db14ff51b7f722b89d95f6cd2f3067c27eb9b8f3d94af7953
container_end_page 366
container_issue 2
container_start_page 351
container_title Journal of loss prevention in the process industries
container_volume 23
creator Sonnemans, P.J.M.
Körvers, P.M.W.
Pasman, H.J.
description Despite the increased understanding of how accidents occur in the chemical process industry, today's safety measures and indicators do not prevent these accidents from occurring. Finding a way to better, proactively, identifying precursors to imminent safety risks, could help organizations to focus their limited resources. The protocol proposed and demonstrated in this paper shows a way to do this. Basis is to examine usually low consequence, high likelihood reoccurring disruptions or deviations in the process (e.g. defects, disturbances, anomalies) for their relevance to process safety and define those possibly leading to accidents as ‘precursors’. As a next step ineffective supervising and managerial control processes and their underlying latent conditions, causing the persistence of these precursors, are identified and it was shown how these cause safety barriers to become ineffective and to open the way to accidents. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates that the proposed 7-stage protocol developed to this end can explicitly and proactively indicate safety risks, and find the controlling latent conditions causing the trouble. It will help organizations to direct their resources to improve safety, which will include their control structure and their normal way of working and will yield higher efficiency as a side benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.01.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_872822992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950423010000021</els_id><sourcerecordid>1966996121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6d1ea769b59897c4db14ff51b7f722b89d95f6cd2f3067c27eb9b8f3d94af7953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqVwAHYW-wQ_kjgWC6gqXlIlNrC2EnsMjpq42CkSu96BLVyuJ8FVWbMazej_ZkYfQueU5JTQ6rLLu-UqZyT1hOaE0AM0obXgGeclO0QTIkuSFYyTY3QSY5cCgtRigm5mWjsDwxixG_B28z340DfL7eYH-xWEZnR-N_7C82bAn36NIwAe36DH2vdueL0-RUe2WUY4-6tT9HJ3-zx_yBZP94_z2SLTnBVjVhkKjahkW8paCl2YlhbWlrQVVjDW1tLI0lbaMMtJJTQT0Mq2ttzIorFClnyKLvZ7V8G_ryGOqvPrMKSTqhasZkxKlkJ0H9LBxxjAqlVwfRM-FSVq50l1KnlSO0-KUJU0JOZqz0D6_sNBUFE7GDQYF0CPynj3D_0LsGVx0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872822992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accidents in “normal” operation – Can you see them coming?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sonnemans, P.J.M. ; Körvers, P.M.W. ; Pasman, H.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonnemans, P.J.M. ; Körvers, P.M.W. ; Pasman, H.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the increased understanding of how accidents occur in the chemical process industry, today's safety measures and indicators do not prevent these accidents from occurring. Finding a way to better, proactively, identifying precursors to imminent safety risks, could help organizations to focus their limited resources. The protocol proposed and demonstrated in this paper shows a way to do this. Basis is to examine usually low consequence, high likelihood reoccurring disruptions or deviations in the process (e.g. defects, disturbances, anomalies) for their relevance to process safety and define those possibly leading to accidents as ‘precursors’. As a next step ineffective supervising and managerial control processes and their underlying latent conditions, causing the persistence of these precursors, are identified and it was shown how these cause safety barriers to become ineffective and to open the way to accidents. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates that the proposed 7-stage protocol developed to this end can explicitly and proactively indicate safety risks, and find the controlling latent conditions causing the trouble. It will help organizations to direct their resources to improve safety, which will include their control structure and their normal way of working and will yield higher efficiency as a side benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-4230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.01.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accident prevention ; Analysis protocol ; Chemical industry ; Occupational safety ; Precursor ; Process safety ; Protocol ; Resilient engineering ; Risk ; Risk factors ; Supervision</subject><ispartof>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2010-03, Vol.23 (2), p.351-366</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6d1ea769b59897c4db14ff51b7f722b89d95f6cd2f3067c27eb9b8f3d94af7953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6d1ea769b59897c4db14ff51b7f722b89d95f6cd2f3067c27eb9b8f3d94af7953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonnemans, P.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körvers, P.M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasman, H.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Accidents in “normal” operation – Can you see them coming?</title><title>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</title><description>Despite the increased understanding of how accidents occur in the chemical process industry, today's safety measures and indicators do not prevent these accidents from occurring. Finding a way to better, proactively, identifying precursors to imminent safety risks, could help organizations to focus their limited resources. The protocol proposed and demonstrated in this paper shows a way to do this. Basis is to examine usually low consequence, high likelihood reoccurring disruptions or deviations in the process (e.g. defects, disturbances, anomalies) for their relevance to process safety and define those possibly leading to accidents as ‘precursors’. As a next step ineffective supervising and managerial control processes and their underlying latent conditions, causing the persistence of these precursors, are identified and it was shown how these cause safety barriers to become ineffective and to open the way to accidents. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates that the proposed 7-stage protocol developed to this end can explicitly and proactively indicate safety risks, and find the controlling latent conditions causing the trouble. It will help organizations to direct their resources to improve safety, which will include their control structure and their normal way of working and will yield higher efficiency as a side benefit.</description><subject>Accident prevention</subject><subject>Analysis protocol</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Precursor</subject><subject>Process safety</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Resilient engineering</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><issn>0950-4230</issn><issn>1873-3352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqVwAHYW-wQ_kjgWC6gqXlIlNrC2EnsMjpq42CkSu96BLVyuJ8FVWbMazej_ZkYfQueU5JTQ6rLLu-UqZyT1hOaE0AM0obXgGeclO0QTIkuSFYyTY3QSY5cCgtRigm5mWjsDwxixG_B28z340DfL7eYH-xWEZnR-N_7C82bAn36NIwAe36DH2vdueL0-RUe2WUY4-6tT9HJ3-zx_yBZP94_z2SLTnBVjVhkKjahkW8paCl2YlhbWlrQVVjDW1tLI0lbaMMtJJTQT0Mq2ttzIorFClnyKLvZ7V8G_ryGOqvPrMKSTqhasZkxKlkJ0H9LBxxjAqlVwfRM-FSVq50l1KnlSO0-KUJU0JOZqz0D6_sNBUFE7GDQYF0CPynj3D_0LsGVx0w</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Sonnemans, P.J.M.</creator><creator>Körvers, P.M.W.</creator><creator>Pasman, H.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Accidents in “normal” operation – Can you see them coming?</title><author>Sonnemans, P.J.M. ; Körvers, P.M.W. ; Pasman, H.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6d1ea769b59897c4db14ff51b7f722b89d95f6cd2f3067c27eb9b8f3d94af7953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accident prevention</topic><topic>Analysis protocol</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Precursor</topic><topic>Process safety</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Resilient engineering</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonnemans, P.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körvers, P.M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasman, H.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonnemans, P.J.M.</au><au>Körvers, P.M.W.</au><au>Pasman, H.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accidents in “normal” operation – Can you see them coming?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>351-366</pages><issn>0950-4230</issn><eissn>1873-3352</eissn><abstract>Despite the increased understanding of how accidents occur in the chemical process industry, today's safety measures and indicators do not prevent these accidents from occurring. Finding a way to better, proactively, identifying precursors to imminent safety risks, could help organizations to focus their limited resources. The protocol proposed and demonstrated in this paper shows a way to do this. Basis is to examine usually low consequence, high likelihood reoccurring disruptions or deviations in the process (e.g. defects, disturbances, anomalies) for their relevance to process safety and define those possibly leading to accidents as ‘precursors’. As a next step ineffective supervising and managerial control processes and their underlying latent conditions, causing the persistence of these precursors, are identified and it was shown how these cause safety barriers to become ineffective and to open the way to accidents. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates that the proposed 7-stage protocol developed to this end can explicitly and proactively indicate safety risks, and find the controlling latent conditions causing the trouble. It will help organizations to direct their resources to improve safety, which will include their control structure and their normal way of working and will yield higher efficiency as a side benefit.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jlp.2010.01.001</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-4230
ispartof Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2010-03, Vol.23 (2), p.351-366
issn 0950-4230
1873-3352
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_872822992
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accident prevention
Analysis protocol
Chemical industry
Occupational safety
Precursor
Process safety
Protocol
Resilient engineering
Risk
Risk factors
Supervision
title Accidents in “normal” operation – Can you see them coming?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A00%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accidents%20in%20%E2%80%9Cnormal%E2%80%9D%20operation%20%E2%80%93%20Can%20you%20see%20them%20coming?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20loss%20prevention%20in%20the%20process%20industries&rft.au=Sonnemans,%20P.J.M.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=351-366&rft.issn=0950-4230&rft.eissn=1873-3352&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966996121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-6d1ea769b59897c4db14ff51b7f722b89d95f6cd2f3067c27eb9b8f3d94af7953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872822992&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true