Loading…
Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy
Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This pa...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Quarterly review of biology 2011-06, Vol.86 (2), p.97-120 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3 |
container_end_page | 120 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 97 |
container_title | The Quarterly review of biology |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Young, Sera L. Sherman, Paul W. Lucks, Julius B. Pelto, Gretel H. |
description | Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/659884 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_878733004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/659884</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/659884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0M1LwzAYBvAgiptT_wQJKuKl-rZpm8SLjLEPYTAPE72VNE0_xtbUpBX631vp1JPg6b38eJ6XB6FzF-5cYOF9GHDG_AM0dAPCHUpddoiGAIQ4AaUwQCfWbgCABxyO0cBzGUBIwiF6e81bvCrxVJg6f3zA0w-xbURdlBletJWuc2WVxeNYNzVe5wo_560t9FZnhRRbPGtKWRe6tHiV4kWzEyWeK13lImtP0VEqtlad7e8Ivcym68nCWa7mT5Px0pF-6NaO9JinYsqlSmlCPJpQP_VTkQKLWcD9UPJQSBmA8KUSnmTg8kTEYeIBBcZJQkboss-tjH5vlK2jjW5M2VVGjDJKCIDfoZseSaOtNSqNKlPshGkjF6Kv_aJ-vw5e7NOaeKeSH_Y9WAdue9DIvJsg05VR1v529jlRlaQdvf4H7dhVzza21uavxz4Bh8KP3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878733004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Young, Sera L. ; Sherman, Paul W. ; Lucks, Julius B. ; Pelto, Gretel H.</creator><contributor>Rowe, Locke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Young, Sera L. ; Sherman, Paul W. ; Lucks, Julius B. ; Pelto, Gretel H. ; Rowe, Locke</creatorcontrib><description>Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-7718</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/659884</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21800636</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QRBIAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Anemia ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Biology ; Calcium ; Climate ; Dietary minerals ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Nutritional deficiencies ; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Pathogens ; Physiology ; Pica - physiopathology ; Pregnancy ; Primates ; Sex Factors ; Soil ; Soils ; Toxins ; Vitamin deficiency ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>The Quarterly review of biology, 2011-06, Vol.86 (2), p.97-120</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 by The University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by The University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21800636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rowe, Locke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Young, Sera L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucks, Julius B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelto, Gretel H.</creatorcontrib><title>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</title><title>The Quarterly review of biology</title><addtitle>Q Rev Biol</addtitle><description>Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Anemia</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Dietary minerals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nutritional deficiencies</subject><subject>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pica - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Vitamin deficiency</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0033-5770</issn><issn>1539-7718</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0M1LwzAYBvAgiptT_wQJKuKl-rZpm8SLjLEPYTAPE72VNE0_xtbUpBX631vp1JPg6b38eJ6XB6FzF-5cYOF9GHDG_AM0dAPCHUpddoiGAIQ4AaUwQCfWbgCABxyO0cBzGUBIwiF6e81bvCrxVJg6f3zA0w-xbURdlBletJWuc2WVxeNYNzVe5wo_560t9FZnhRRbPGtKWRe6tHiV4kWzEyWeK13lImtP0VEqtlad7e8Ivcym68nCWa7mT5Px0pF-6NaO9JinYsqlSmlCPJpQP_VTkQKLWcD9UPJQSBmA8KUSnmTg8kTEYeIBBcZJQkboss-tjH5vlK2jjW5M2VVGjDJKCIDfoZseSaOtNSqNKlPshGkjF6Kv_aJ-vw5e7NOaeKeSH_Y9WAdue9DIvJsg05VR1v529jlRlaQdvf4H7dhVzza21uavxz4Bh8KP3g</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Young, Sera L.</creator><creator>Sherman, Paul W.</creator><creator>Lucks, Julius B.</creator><creator>Pelto, Gretel H.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</title><author>Young, Sera L. ; Sherman, Paul W. ; Lucks, Julius B. ; Pelto, Gretel H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Anemia</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Dietary minerals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nutritional deficiencies</topic><topic>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pica - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Vitamin deficiency</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Sera L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucks, Julius B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelto, Gretel H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly review of biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Sera L.</au><au>Sherman, Paul W.</au><au>Lucks, Julius B.</au><au>Pelto, Gretel H.</au><addau>Rowe, Locke</addau><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly review of biology</jtitle><addtitle>Q Rev Biol</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>97-120</pages><issn>0033-5770</issn><eissn>1539-7718</eissn><coden>QRBIAK</coden><abstract>Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>21800636</pmid><doi>10.1086/659884</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-5770 |
ispartof | The Quarterly review of biology, 2011-06, Vol.86 (2), p.97-120 |
issn | 0033-5770 1539-7718 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_878733004 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Age Factors Anemia Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animals Biology Calcium Climate Dietary minerals Female Humans Male Nutritional deficiencies Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Pathogens Physiology Pica - physiopathology Pregnancy Primates Sex Factors Soil Soils Toxins Vitamin deficiency Zinc |
title | Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T18%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20On%20Earth?:%20Evaluating%20Hypotheses%20About%20The%20Physiological%20Functions%20Of%20Human%20Geophagy&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20review%20of%20biology&rft.au=Young,%20Sera%C2%A0L.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=97-120&rft.issn=0033-5770&rft.eissn=1539-7718&rft.coden=QRBIAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/659884&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/659884%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878733004&rft_id=info:pmid/21800636&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/659884&rfr_iscdi=true |