Loading…

Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy

Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Quarterly review of biology 2011-06, Vol.86 (2), p.97-120
Main Authors: Young, Sera L., Sherman, Paul W., Lucks, Julius B., Pelto, Gretel H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3
container_end_page 120
container_issue 2
container_start_page 97
container_title The Quarterly review of biology
container_volume 86
creator Young, Sera L.
Sherman, Paul W.
Lucks, Julius B.
Pelto, Gretel H.
description Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/659884
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_878733004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/659884</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/659884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0M1LwzAYBvAgiptT_wQJKuKl-rZpm8SLjLEPYTAPE72VNE0_xtbUpBX631vp1JPg6b38eJ6XB6FzF-5cYOF9GHDG_AM0dAPCHUpddoiGAIQ4AaUwQCfWbgCABxyO0cBzGUBIwiF6e81bvCrxVJg6f3zA0w-xbURdlBletJWuc2WVxeNYNzVe5wo_560t9FZnhRRbPGtKWRe6tHiV4kWzEyWeK13lImtP0VEqtlad7e8Ivcym68nCWa7mT5Px0pF-6NaO9JinYsqlSmlCPJpQP_VTkQKLWcD9UPJQSBmA8KUSnmTg8kTEYeIBBcZJQkboss-tjH5vlK2jjW5M2VVGjDJKCIDfoZseSaOtNSqNKlPshGkjF6Kv_aJ-vw5e7NOaeKeSH_Y9WAdue9DIvJsg05VR1v529jlRlaQdvf4H7dhVzza21uavxz4Bh8KP3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878733004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Young, Sera L. ; Sherman, Paul W. ; Lucks, Julius B. ; Pelto, Gretel H.</creator><contributor>Rowe, Locke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Young, Sera L. ; Sherman, Paul W. ; Lucks, Julius B. ; Pelto, Gretel H. ; Rowe, Locke</creatorcontrib><description>Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-7718</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/659884</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21800636</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QRBIAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Anemia ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Biology ; Calcium ; Climate ; Dietary minerals ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Nutritional deficiencies ; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Pathogens ; Physiology ; Pica - physiopathology ; Pregnancy ; Primates ; Sex Factors ; Soil ; Soils ; Toxins ; Vitamin deficiency ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>The Quarterly review of biology, 2011-06, Vol.86 (2), p.97-120</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 by The University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by The University of Chicago Press. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21800636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rowe, Locke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Young, Sera L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucks, Julius B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelto, Gretel H.</creatorcontrib><title>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</title><title>The Quarterly review of biology</title><addtitle>Q Rev Biol</addtitle><description>Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Anemia</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Dietary minerals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nutritional deficiencies</subject><subject>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pica - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Vitamin deficiency</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0033-5770</issn><issn>1539-7718</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0M1LwzAYBvAgiptT_wQJKuKl-rZpm8SLjLEPYTAPE72VNE0_xtbUpBX631vp1JPg6b38eJ6XB6FzF-5cYOF9GHDG_AM0dAPCHUpddoiGAIQ4AaUwQCfWbgCABxyO0cBzGUBIwiF6e81bvCrxVJg6f3zA0w-xbURdlBletJWuc2WVxeNYNzVe5wo_560t9FZnhRRbPGtKWRe6tHiV4kWzEyWeK13lImtP0VEqtlad7e8Ivcym68nCWa7mT5Px0pF-6NaO9JinYsqlSmlCPJpQP_VTkQKLWcD9UPJQSBmA8KUSnmTg8kTEYeIBBcZJQkboss-tjH5vlK2jjW5M2VVGjDJKCIDfoZseSaOtNSqNKlPshGkjF6Kv_aJ-vw5e7NOaeKeSH_Y9WAdue9DIvJsg05VR1v529jlRlaQdvf4H7dhVzza21uavxz4Bh8KP3g</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Young, Sera L.</creator><creator>Sherman, Paul W.</creator><creator>Lucks, Julius B.</creator><creator>Pelto, Gretel H.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</title><author>Young, Sera L. ; Sherman, Paul W. ; Lucks, Julius B. ; Pelto, Gretel H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Anemia</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Dietary minerals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nutritional deficiencies</topic><topic>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pica - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Vitamin deficiency</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Sera L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucks, Julius B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelto, Gretel H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly review of biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Sera L.</au><au>Sherman, Paul W.</au><au>Lucks, Julius B.</au><au>Pelto, Gretel H.</au><addau>Rowe, Locke</addau><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly review of biology</jtitle><addtitle>Q Rev Biol</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>97-120</pages><issn>0033-5770</issn><eissn>1539-7718</eissn><coden>QRBIAK</coden><abstract>Geophagy has been hypothesized to be an adaptive behavior, either as a means to allay nutrient deficiency or to protect against ingested pathogens and toxins. Others have proposed that geophagy is non-adaptive, occurring either to allay hunger or as an epiphenomenon of nutrient deficiencies. This paper evaluates these hypotheses using 482 published cultural-level accounts of human geophagy and 330 accounts of geophagy among 297 species of mammals, birds, and reptiles. Information was extracted from reports of human geophagy to permit statistical analysis; reports of non-human geophagy were tabulated. Human geophagy did not parallel changes in nutrient requirements, occurred most frequently among children and pregnant women and in tropical areas (where pathogen densities are highest), and was associated with ingestion of toxic substances and gastrointestinal distress. Earth ingested by humans was craved and carefully selected and prepared; it had high clay content, but few bioavailable mineral nutrients. In primates, geophagy was associated with both protection from toxins and obtaining nutrients, whereas in other vertebrates it was associated mainly with obtaining nutrients. Our results indicate that human geophagy is best explained as providing protection from dietary chemicals, parasites, and pathogens, whereas animal geophagy may involve both micronutrient acquisition and protection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>21800636</pmid><doi>10.1086/659884</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-5770
ispartof The Quarterly review of biology, 2011-06, Vol.86 (2), p.97-120
issn 0033-5770
1539-7718
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_878733004
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Age Factors
Anemia
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Animals
Biology
Calcium
Climate
Dietary minerals
Female
Humans
Male
Nutritional deficiencies
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Pathogens
Physiology
Pica - physiopathology
Pregnancy
Primates
Sex Factors
Soil
Soils
Toxins
Vitamin deficiency
Zinc
title Why On Earth?: Evaluating Hypotheses About The Physiological Functions Of Human Geophagy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T18%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20On%20Earth?:%20Evaluating%20Hypotheses%20About%20The%20Physiological%20Functions%20Of%20Human%20Geophagy&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20review%20of%20biology&rft.au=Young,%20Sera%C2%A0L.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=97-120&rft.issn=0033-5770&rft.eissn=1539-7718&rft.coden=QRBIAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/659884&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/659884%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c282eb79cef7d327d74f4faf08b85946c96acc50a4cea2c8019dab6d2070893d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878733004&rft_id=info:pmid/21800636&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/659884&rfr_iscdi=true