Loading…
Capital Projects
The paper surveys the present state of knowledge about the appraisal and control of capital projects, and identifies the useful contribution which actuaries can make to the process. Relevant theoretical considerations are discussed, including the choice of appropriate discount rates for use by compa...
Saved in:
Published in: | British Actuarial Journal 1995-06, Vol.1 (2), p.155-249 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2416-9abfba89fbf68fa144c453b8c3625667bcea69a597009a96995df5fa8877144d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2416-9abfba89fbf68fa144c453b8c3625667bcea69a597009a96995df5fa8877144d3 |
container_end_page | 249 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | British Actuarial Journal |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Lewin, C.G. Carne, S.A. de Rivaz, N.F.C. Hall, R.E.G. McKelvey, K.J. Wilkie, A.D. |
description | The paper surveys the present state of knowledge about the appraisal and control of capital projects, and identifies the useful contribution which actuaries can make to the process. Relevant theoretical considerations are discussed, including the choice of appropriate discount rates for use by companies when screening proposals. It is recommended that discount rates should be lower than those commonly used. Some practical working methods are summarised and examples are given of how risk analysis can be carried out, for both simple and complex appraisals. Attention is drawn to the special ‘social’ considerations which may apply in the case of Government projects. The opportunities now opening up for joint ventures between the UK Government and private sector partners are examined, and it is concluded that proper sharing of costs and risks can facilitate arrangements which are acceptable to both sides. The paper concludes with a discussion of the procedures which companies can use to identify, appraise, control and monitor projects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1357321700001082 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_878831034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1357321700001082</cupid><jstor_id>41141218</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41141218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2416-9abfba89fbf68fa144c453b8c3625667bcea69a597009a96995df5fa8877144d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81LxDAQxYMouK6CVw-CeK9m8p2jFL9gQUE9hyRNpGXX1qR78L83pYsexLnM4f3em3kInQG-Agzy-gUol5SAxGUAK7KHFgQzVmHGxT5aTHI16YfoKOeuMJJotUCntR3a0a4vnlPfBT_mY3QQ7TqHk91eore729f6oVo93T_WN6vKEwai0tZFZ5WOLgoVLTDmGadOeSoIF0I6H6zQluvykLZaaM2byKNVSsoCN3SJLufcIfWf25BH0_Xb9FFOGiWVooApKxDMkE99zilEM6R2Y9OXAWym3uZP7-I5nz1dHvv0Y2AADAiootNdpt241Dbv4ffy_6nfVVZgLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878831034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capital Projects</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Lewin, C.G. ; Carne, S.A. ; de Rivaz, N.F.C. ; Hall, R.E.G. ; McKelvey, K.J. ; Wilkie, A.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewin, C.G. ; Carne, S.A. ; de Rivaz, N.F.C. ; Hall, R.E.G. ; McKelvey, K.J. ; Wilkie, A.D.</creatorcontrib><description>The paper surveys the present state of knowledge about the appraisal and control of capital projects, and identifies the useful contribution which actuaries can make to the process. Relevant theoretical considerations are discussed, including the choice of appropriate discount rates for use by companies when screening proposals. It is recommended that discount rates should be lower than those commonly used. Some practical working methods are summarised and examples are given of how risk analysis can be carried out, for both simple and complex appraisals. Attention is drawn to the special ‘social’ considerations which may apply in the case of Government projects. The opportunities now opening up for joint ventures between the UK Government and private sector partners are examined, and it is concluded that proper sharing of costs and risks can facilitate arrangements which are acceptable to both sides. The paper concludes with a discussion of the procedures which companies can use to identify, appraise, control and monitor projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-3217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-0456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5002</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1357321700001082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Actuarial science ; Business structures ; Capital costs ; Capital investments ; Cash flow ; Discount rates ; Financial investments ; Investment return rates ; Investment risk ; Investors ; Security portfolios ; Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions</subject><ispartof>British Actuarial Journal, 1995-06, Vol.1 (2), p.155-249</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1995</rights><rights>INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2416-9abfba89fbf68fa144c453b8c3625667bcea69a597009a96995df5fa8877144d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2416-9abfba89fbf68fa144c453b8c3625667bcea69a597009a96995df5fa8877144d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/878831034/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/878831034?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,44339,58213,58446,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewin, C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carne, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Rivaz, N.F.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, R.E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKelvey, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkie, A.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Capital Projects</title><title>British Actuarial Journal</title><addtitle>Br. Actuar. J</addtitle><description>The paper surveys the present state of knowledge about the appraisal and control of capital projects, and identifies the useful contribution which actuaries can make to the process. Relevant theoretical considerations are discussed, including the choice of appropriate discount rates for use by companies when screening proposals. It is recommended that discount rates should be lower than those commonly used. Some practical working methods are summarised and examples are given of how risk analysis can be carried out, for both simple and complex appraisals. Attention is drawn to the special ‘social’ considerations which may apply in the case of Government projects. The opportunities now opening up for joint ventures between the UK Government and private sector partners are examined, and it is concluded that proper sharing of costs and risks can facilitate arrangements which are acceptable to both sides. The paper concludes with a discussion of the procedures which companies can use to identify, appraise, control and monitor projects.</description><subject>Actuarial science</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>Investment return rates</subject><subject>Investment risk</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Security portfolios</subject><subject>Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions</subject><issn>1357-3217</issn><issn>2044-0456</issn><issn>1748-5002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1j81LxDAQxYMouK6CVw-CeK9m8p2jFL9gQUE9hyRNpGXX1qR78L83pYsexLnM4f3em3kInQG-Agzy-gUol5SAxGUAK7KHFgQzVmHGxT5aTHI16YfoKOeuMJJotUCntR3a0a4vnlPfBT_mY3QQ7TqHk91eore729f6oVo93T_WN6vKEwai0tZFZ5WOLgoVLTDmGadOeSoIF0I6H6zQluvykLZaaM2byKNVSsoCN3SJLufcIfWf25BH0_Xb9FFOGiWVooApKxDMkE99zilEM6R2Y9OXAWym3uZP7-I5nz1dHvv0Y2AADAiootNdpt241Dbv4ffy_6nfVVZgLw</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>Lewin, C.G.</creator><creator>Carne, S.A.</creator><creator>de Rivaz, N.F.C.</creator><creator>Hall, R.E.G.</creator><creator>McKelvey, K.J.</creator><creator>Wilkie, A.D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Institute of Actuaries and the Faculty of Actuaries</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>Capital Projects</title><author>Lewin, C.G. ; Carne, S.A. ; de Rivaz, N.F.C. ; Hall, R.E.G. ; McKelvey, K.J. ; Wilkie, A.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2416-9abfba89fbf68fa144c453b8c3625667bcea69a597009a96995df5fa8877144d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Actuarial science</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>Investment return rates</topic><topic>Investment risk</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Security portfolios</topic><topic>Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewin, C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carne, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Rivaz, N.F.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, R.E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKelvey, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkie, A.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>British Actuarial Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewin, C.G.</au><au>Carne, S.A.</au><au>de Rivaz, N.F.C.</au><au>Hall, R.E.G.</au><au>McKelvey, K.J.</au><au>Wilkie, A.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capital Projects</atitle><jtitle>British Actuarial Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Br. Actuar. J</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>155-249</pages><issn>1357-3217</issn><eissn>2044-0456</eissn><eissn>1748-5002</eissn><abstract>The paper surveys the present state of knowledge about the appraisal and control of capital projects, and identifies the useful contribution which actuaries can make to the process. Relevant theoretical considerations are discussed, including the choice of appropriate discount rates for use by companies when screening proposals. It is recommended that discount rates should be lower than those commonly used. Some practical working methods are summarised and examples are given of how risk analysis can be carried out, for both simple and complex appraisals. Attention is drawn to the special ‘social’ considerations which may apply in the case of Government projects. The opportunities now opening up for joint ventures between the UK Government and private sector partners are examined, and it is concluded that proper sharing of costs and risks can facilitate arrangements which are acceptable to both sides. The paper concludes with a discussion of the procedures which companies can use to identify, appraise, control and monitor projects.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1357321700001082</doi><tpages>95</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1357-3217 |
ispartof | British Actuarial Journal, 1995-06, Vol.1 (2), p.155-249 |
issn | 1357-3217 2044-0456 1748-5002 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_878831034 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Actuarial science Business structures Capital costs Capital investments Cash flow Discount rates Financial investments Investment return rates Investment risk Investors Security portfolios Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions |
title | Capital Projects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A06%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capital%20Projects&rft.jtitle=British%20Actuarial%20Journal&rft.au=Lewin,%20C.G.&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=155-249&rft.issn=1357-3217&rft.eissn=2044-0456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1357321700001082&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41141218%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2416-9abfba89fbf68fa144c453b8c3625667bcea69a597009a96995df5fa8877144d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878831034&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1357321700001082&rft_jstor_id=41141218&rfr_iscdi=true |