Loading…

Locating sensor nodes on construction projects

Issue Title: Special Issue on Construction Robotics. Guest Editor: Thomas Bock Localization of randomly distributed wireless sensor nodes is a significant and fundamental problem in a broad range of emerging civil engineering applications. Densely deployed in physical environments, they are envision...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Autonomous robots 2007-04, Vol.22 (3), p.255-263
Main Authors: Caron, François, Razavi, Saiedeh Navabzadeh, Song, Jongchul, Vanheeghe, Philippe, Duflos, Emmanuel, Caldas, Carlos, Haas, Carl
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Issue Title: Special Issue on Construction Robotics. Guest Editor: Thomas Bock Localization of randomly distributed wireless sensor nodes is a significant and fundamental problem in a broad range of emerging civil engineering applications. Densely deployed in physical environments, they are envisioned to form ad hoc communication networks and provide sensed data without relying on a fixed communications infrastructure. To establish ad hoc communication networks among wireless sensor nodes, it is useful and sometimes necessary to determine sensors' positions in static and dynamic sensor arrays. As well, the location of sensor nodes becomes of immediate use if construction resources, such as materials and components, are to be tracked. Tracking the location of construction resources enables effortless progress monitoring and supports real-time construction state sensing. This paper compares several models for localizing RFID nodes on construction job sites. They range from those based on triangulation with reference to transmission space maps, to roving RFID reader and tag systems using multiple proximity constraints, to approaches for processing uncertainty and imprecision in proximity measurements. They are compared qualitatively on the basis of cost, flexibility, scalability, computational complexity, ability to manage uncertainty and imprecision, and ability to handle dynamic sensor arrays. Results of field experiments and simulations are also presented where applicable.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0929-5593
1573-7527
DOI:10.1007/s10514-006-9720-1