An Integrative Theory of the Division of Domestic Labor: Threshold Level, Social Organizing and Sensemaking

The distribution, negotiation and management of unpaid domestic labor are issues that are inextricably linked to the well-being of families, relationships, and our very selves. For example, disputes and arguments about chores rate amongst the most common and destructive in terms of relational confli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of family communication 2011-01, Vol.11 (1), p.21-38
Main Authors: Alberts, Jess K., Tracy, Sarah J., Trethewey, Angela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Conflict
Couples
Families & family life
Family Relations
Housework
Husbands
Inequality
Intergenerational relationships
Interpersonal communication
Management
Theory
Well Being
Wives
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The distribution, negotiation and management of unpaid domestic labor are issues that are inextricably linked to the well-being of families, relationships, and our very selves. For example, disputes and arguments about chores rate amongst the most common and destructive in terms of relational conflict. Several theories have been developed to explain the division of household labor, but scholars have yet to be successful in explaining persistent differences in husbands' and wives' domestic contributions. As a step toward doing so, here we provide an integrative theory that builds upon singular explanations such as gender display and evolutionary/biosocial differences. In this paper, we incorporate these theories, introduce the importance of threshold level, and integrate concepts derived from self-organizing systems theory, the economy of gratitude, and individual, dyadic and social sensemaking processes. Together, these provide an integrated theory well suited to explore how couples' communicative practices both create and can ameliorate inequities in the division of domestic labor.
ISSN:1526-7431
1532-7698
DOI:10.1080/15267431.2011.534334