Natural orifice hysterectomy

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as natural orifice surgery is perceived as a relatively recent development partly because many MIS techniques utilize new technology and devices. However, a natural orifice/MIS approach for hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy, VH) has existed for over a century....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Urogynecology Journal 2008-09, Vol.19 (9), p.1189-1192
Main Authors: Moen, Michael D., Noone, Michael B., Elser, Denise M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Current Opinion/Update
Gynecology
Hysterectomy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Urology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-a7759586781bdca38189e57902590cd50bdf2dfc4cf7a65d47c695a91139b5ef3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-a7759586781bdca38189e57902590cd50bdf2dfc4cf7a65d47c695a91139b5ef3
container_end_page 1192
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1189
container_title International Urogynecology Journal
container_volume 19
creator Moen, Michael D.
Noone, Michael B.
Elser, Denise M.
description Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as natural orifice surgery is perceived as a relatively recent development partly because many MIS techniques utilize new technology and devices. However, a natural orifice/MIS approach for hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy, VH) has existed for over a century. VH is typically thought of in the realm of the urogynecologist as a component of reconstructive pelvic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However, current evidence supports the use of VH in women with other benign conditions such as uterine fibroids and abnormal bleeding. Despite the evidence and availability of several MIS options for hysterectomy, the majority of hysterectomies continue to be performed via laparotomy. VH is the least invasive approach to hysterectomy, and its use should be encouraged as the preferred MIS option for women requiring uterine removal for benign conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_881296143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418008741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-a7759586781bdca38189e57902590cd50bdf2dfc4cf7a65d47c695a91139b5ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EEqHwA5AYKnbDsx1_vBFVUJAqWGC2HMeGVG1T7GTIvydRkJiY3nLPvXqHkGsGdwxA32cAhpwCGApKIh1OSMFKIagALk5JASg0FaXi5-Qi5y0AlCChIDevruuT2y3b1MTGh-XXkLuQgu_a_XBJzqLb5XD1exfk4-nxffVMN2_rl9XDhnqhsKNOa4nSKG1YVXsnDDMYpEbgEsHXEqo68jr60kftlKxL7RVKh4wJrGSIYkFu595jar_7kDu7bft0GCetMYyjmj5ZEDaHfGpzTiHaY2r2Lg2WgZ0c2NmBHR3YyYEdRobPTB6zh8-Q_or_h34A2Jddzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881296143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural orifice hysterectomy</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Moen, Michael D. ; Noone, Michael B. ; Elser, Denise M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moen, Michael D. ; Noone, Michael B. ; Elser, Denise M. ; for the Urogynecology Network</creatorcontrib><description>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as natural orifice surgery is perceived as a relatively recent development partly because many MIS techniques utilize new technology and devices. However, a natural orifice/MIS approach for hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy, VH) has existed for over a century. VH is typically thought of in the realm of the urogynecologist as a component of reconstructive pelvic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However, current evidence supports the use of VH in women with other benign conditions such as uterine fibroids and abnormal bleeding. Despite the evidence and availability of several MIS options for hysterectomy, the majority of hysterectomies continue to be performed via laparotomy. VH is the least invasive approach to hysterectomy, and its use should be encouraged as the preferred MIS option for women requiring uterine removal for benign conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Current Opinion/Update ; Gynecology ; Hysterectomy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2008-09, Vol.19 (9), p.1189-1192</ispartof><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-a7759586781bdca38189e57902590cd50bdf2dfc4cf7a65d47c695a91139b5ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-a7759586781bdca38189e57902590cd50bdf2dfc4cf7a65d47c695a91139b5ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moen, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noone, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elser, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Urogynecology Network</creatorcontrib><title>Natural orifice hysterectomy</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as natural orifice surgery is perceived as a relatively recent development partly because many MIS techniques utilize new technology and devices. However, a natural orifice/MIS approach for hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy, VH) has existed for over a century. VH is typically thought of in the realm of the urogynecologist as a component of reconstructive pelvic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However, current evidence supports the use of VH in women with other benign conditions such as uterine fibroids and abnormal bleeding. Despite the evidence and availability of several MIS options for hysterectomy, the majority of hysterectomies continue to be performed via laparotomy. VH is the least invasive approach to hysterectomy, and its use should be encouraged as the preferred MIS option for women requiring uterine removal for benign conditions.</description><subject>Current Opinion/Update</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EEqHwA5AYKnbDsx1_vBFVUJAqWGC2HMeGVG1T7GTIvydRkJiY3nLPvXqHkGsGdwxA32cAhpwCGApKIh1OSMFKIagALk5JASg0FaXi5-Qi5y0AlCChIDevruuT2y3b1MTGh-XXkLuQgu_a_XBJzqLb5XD1exfk4-nxffVMN2_rl9XDhnqhsKNOa4nSKG1YVXsnDDMYpEbgEsHXEqo68jr60kftlKxL7RVKh4wJrGSIYkFu595jar_7kDu7bft0GCetMYyjmj5ZEDaHfGpzTiHaY2r2Lg2WgZ0c2NmBHR3YyYEdRobPTB6zh8-Q_or_h34A2Jddzw</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Moen, Michael D.</creator><creator>Noone, Michael B.</creator><creator>Elser, Denise M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Natural orifice hysterectomy</title><author>Moen, Michael D. ; Noone, Michael B. ; Elser, Denise M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-a7759586781bdca38189e57902590cd50bdf2dfc4cf7a65d47c695a91139b5ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Current Opinion/Update</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moen, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noone, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elser, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Urogynecology Network</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moen, Michael D.</au><au>Noone, Michael B.</au><au>Elser, Denise M.</au><aucorp>for the Urogynecology Network</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural orifice hysterectomy</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1189</spage><epage>1192</epage><pages>1189-1192</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as natural orifice surgery is perceived as a relatively recent development partly because many MIS techniques utilize new technology and devices. However, a natural orifice/MIS approach for hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy, VH) has existed for over a century. VH is typically thought of in the realm of the urogynecologist as a component of reconstructive pelvic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However, current evidence supports the use of VH in women with other benign conditions such as uterine fibroids and abnormal bleeding. Despite the evidence and availability of several MIS options for hysterectomy, the majority of hysterectomies continue to be performed via laparotomy. VH is the least invasive approach to hysterectomy, and its use should be encouraged as the preferred MIS option for women requiring uterine removal for benign conditions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-3462
ispartof International Urogynecology Journal, 2008-09, Vol.19 (9), p.1189-1192
issn 0937-3462
1433-3023
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_881296143
source Springer Link
subjects Current Opinion/Update
Gynecology
Hysterectomy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Urology
title Natural orifice hysterectomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A45%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20orifice%20hysterectomy&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Moen,%20Michael%20D.&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20Urogynecology%20Network&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1189&rft.epage=1192&rft.pages=1189-1192&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418008741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-a7759586781bdca38189e57902590cd50bdf2dfc4cf7a65d47c695a91139b5ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881296143&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true