Loading…
Comparing the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and clopidogrel besylate: a crossover study
Background Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetyl salicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate, was approved in Germany as a “new drug” in May 2008. On...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical research in cardiology 2009-09, Vol.98 (9), p.533-540 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-152f8efbebfeb30ea3e62d621c5d8dda726a442b801c5d4ffbe1bda99fbf23da3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-152f8efbebfeb30ea3e62d621c5d8dda726a442b801c5d4ffbe1bda99fbf23da3 |
container_end_page | 540 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 533 |
container_title | Clinical research in cardiology |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Neubauer, Horst Krüger, Jan Christopher Lask, Sebastian Endres, Heinz G Pepinghege, Fenena Engelhardt, Andreas Bulut, Daniel Mügge, Andreas |
description | Background Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetyl salicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate, was approved in Germany as a “new drug” in May 2008. Only one study with 46 healthy men compared the plasma concentrations of both clopidogrel formulas. In our crossover study we measured the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS, clopidogrel bisulfate) and clopidogrel besylate (CB) using two techniques, whole blood impedance aggregometry and flow cytometry in healthy subjects. Methods Twenty-one healthy volunteers (14 male, 7 female, mean age 36.3 years) were treated either with CHS or CB (300 mg loading, followed by 75 mg/day) and after a wash-out period of at least 21 days, the participants were switched to the other clopidogrel salt in a crossover design. Blood samples were drawn before and 2, 4 and 48 h after the initial dose was taken. Flow cytometry measurements of CD62P (P-selectin) expression were done at baseline and 48 h thereafter with three different ADP concentrations (5, 15, 50 μmol/L ADP). Whole blood impedance aggregometry testing (Chrono-log Model 590) was performed at baseline and after 2, 4 and 48 h with two ADP concentrations (5 and 20 μmol/L ADP). Results Using flow cytometry, the mean inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on the CD62P expression was similar and no significant differences were noted in subjects treated with either of the clopidogrel formulas for hydrogensulfate or besylate salt (5 μmol/L ADP: 8.12 ± 5.53 CHS vs. 6.48 ± 5.01 CB; 15 μmol/L ADP: 9.33 ± 6.44 CHS vs. 8.99 ± 8.27 CB; 50 μmol/L ADP: 11.17 ± 6.81 CHS vs. 9.52 ± 6.17 CB). It is important to note that clopidogrel CB shows similar and conspicuously high interindividual variability as was reported earlier on CHS. We observed both possibilities, subjects responding less to the hydrogensulfate salt, but better to the besylate salt, and vice versa. Using aggregometry, both salt formulas achieved similar inhibitory effects regarding initial platelet function (2 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 4.5 ± 3.66 Ω; CB 3.89 ± 3.81 Ω and 4 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 5.78 ± 3.51 Ω; CB 4.89 ± 4.03 Ω) as well as during the maintenance phase (48 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 2.86 ± 2.92 Ω; CB 3.43 ± 3.06 Ω). Once again the aggregometry results for CB showed a similarly high interindividual variability as also holds true for CHS. Some subjects had a better a |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00392-009-0033-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_881389966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418685001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-152f8efbebfeb30ea3e62d621c5d8dda726a442b801c5d4ffbe1bda99fbf23da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u3CAURlHVqPl9gGxS1L2Te8HjQHfVqE0iRcoiyRphc5nxyDO4YFeatw-OR4266QKB4HzfRYexS4RrBLi9SQBSiwJA5yVlgZ_YCaoKC6i0-Pz3rMpjdprSBmCBIMsv7Bj1Akos8YR1y7DtbWx3Kz6sidvd0PadHaijgZP31Aw8eN50oW9dWEXq-HrvYljRLo2dz2COuH_ea0r7qeE7t7yJIaXwhyJPw-j25-zI2y7RxWE_Y6-_fr4s74vHp7uH5Y_HopG6HApcCK_I11R7qiWQlVQJVwlsFk45Z29FZctS1Aqmm9JnEmtntfa1F9JZeca-zb19DL9HSoPZhDHu8kijFEqldVVlCGfo_ZORvOlju7VxbxDMpNfMek3Waya9BnPm6lA81ltyH4mDzwyIGUj95JTix-T_tX6dQ94GY1exTeb1WQBKwEoJIYV8A9i0kd0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881389966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and clopidogrel besylate: a crossover study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Neubauer, Horst ; Krüger, Jan Christopher ; Lask, Sebastian ; Endres, Heinz G ; Pepinghege, Fenena ; Engelhardt, Andreas ; Bulut, Daniel ; Mügge, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Horst ; Krüger, Jan Christopher ; Lask, Sebastian ; Endres, Heinz G ; Pepinghege, Fenena ; Engelhardt, Andreas ; Bulut, Daniel ; Mügge, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Background Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetyl salicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate, was approved in Germany as a “new drug” in May 2008. Only one study with 46 healthy men compared the plasma concentrations of both clopidogrel formulas. In our crossover study we measured the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS, clopidogrel bisulfate) and clopidogrel besylate (CB) using two techniques, whole blood impedance aggregometry and flow cytometry in healthy subjects. Methods Twenty-one healthy volunteers (14 male, 7 female, mean age 36.3 years) were treated either with CHS or CB (300 mg loading, followed by 75 mg/day) and after a wash-out period of at least 21 days, the participants were switched to the other clopidogrel salt in a crossover design. Blood samples were drawn before and 2, 4 and 48 h after the initial dose was taken. Flow cytometry measurements of CD62P (P-selectin) expression were done at baseline and 48 h thereafter with three different ADP concentrations (5, 15, 50 μmol/L ADP). Whole blood impedance aggregometry testing (Chrono-log Model 590) was performed at baseline and after 2, 4 and 48 h with two ADP concentrations (5 and 20 μmol/L ADP). Results Using flow cytometry, the mean inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on the CD62P expression was similar and no significant differences were noted in subjects treated with either of the clopidogrel formulas for hydrogensulfate or besylate salt (5 μmol/L ADP: 8.12 ± 5.53 CHS vs. 6.48 ± 5.01 CB; 15 μmol/L ADP: 9.33 ± 6.44 CHS vs. 8.99 ± 8.27 CB; 50 μmol/L ADP: 11.17 ± 6.81 CHS vs. 9.52 ± 6.17 CB). It is important to note that clopidogrel CB shows similar and conspicuously high interindividual variability as was reported earlier on CHS. We observed both possibilities, subjects responding less to the hydrogensulfate salt, but better to the besylate salt, and vice versa. Using aggregometry, both salt formulas achieved similar inhibitory effects regarding initial platelet function (2 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 4.5 ± 3.66 Ω; CB 3.89 ± 3.81 Ω and 4 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 5.78 ± 3.51 Ω; CB 4.89 ± 4.03 Ω) as well as during the maintenance phase (48 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 2.86 ± 2.92 Ω; CB 3.43 ± 3.06 Ω). Once again the aggregometry results for CB showed a similarly high interindividual variability as also holds true for CHS. Some subjects had a better antiplatelet effect with clopidogrel besylate and vice versa with clopidogrel hydrogensulfate. Conclusion The crossover study using whole blood aggregometry and flow cytometry shows no overall significant difference in the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate as compared to clopidogrel besylate. However, it is important to note that besides high interindividual there is also high intraindividual variability between the two different clopidogrel formulas. We observed both: subjects responding less to besylate salt, but better to hydrogensulfate salt, and vice versa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1861-0684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1861-0692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00392-009-0033-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19504141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Heidelberg : D. Steinkopff-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiology ; Cross-Over Studies ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Flow cytometry ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Platelet Activation - drug effects ; Platelet Aggregation - drug effects ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration & dosage ; Ticlopidine - administration & dosage ; Ticlopidine - analogs & derivatives ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical research in cardiology, 2009-09, Vol.98 (9), p.533-540</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-152f8efbebfeb30ea3e62d621c5d8dda726a442b801c5d4ffbe1bda99fbf23da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-152f8efbebfeb30ea3e62d621c5d8dda726a442b801c5d4ffbe1bda99fbf23da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19504141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Jan Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lask, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endres, Heinz G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepinghege, Fenena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulut, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mügge, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and clopidogrel besylate: a crossover study</title><title>Clinical research in cardiology</title><addtitle>Clin Res Cardiol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Res Cardiol</addtitle><description>Background Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetyl salicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate, was approved in Germany as a “new drug” in May 2008. Only one study with 46 healthy men compared the plasma concentrations of both clopidogrel formulas. In our crossover study we measured the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS, clopidogrel bisulfate) and clopidogrel besylate (CB) using two techniques, whole blood impedance aggregometry and flow cytometry in healthy subjects. Methods Twenty-one healthy volunteers (14 male, 7 female, mean age 36.3 years) were treated either with CHS or CB (300 mg loading, followed by 75 mg/day) and after a wash-out period of at least 21 days, the participants were switched to the other clopidogrel salt in a crossover design. Blood samples were drawn before and 2, 4 and 48 h after the initial dose was taken. Flow cytometry measurements of CD62P (P-selectin) expression were done at baseline and 48 h thereafter with three different ADP concentrations (5, 15, 50 μmol/L ADP). Whole blood impedance aggregometry testing (Chrono-log Model 590) was performed at baseline and after 2, 4 and 48 h with two ADP concentrations (5 and 20 μmol/L ADP). Results Using flow cytometry, the mean inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on the CD62P expression was similar and no significant differences were noted in subjects treated with either of the clopidogrel formulas for hydrogensulfate or besylate salt (5 μmol/L ADP: 8.12 ± 5.53 CHS vs. 6.48 ± 5.01 CB; 15 μmol/L ADP: 9.33 ± 6.44 CHS vs. 8.99 ± 8.27 CB; 50 μmol/L ADP: 11.17 ± 6.81 CHS vs. 9.52 ± 6.17 CB). It is important to note that clopidogrel CB shows similar and conspicuously high interindividual variability as was reported earlier on CHS. We observed both possibilities, subjects responding less to the hydrogensulfate salt, but better to the besylate salt, and vice versa. Using aggregometry, both salt formulas achieved similar inhibitory effects regarding initial platelet function (2 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 4.5 ± 3.66 Ω; CB 3.89 ± 3.81 Ω and 4 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 5.78 ± 3.51 Ω; CB 4.89 ± 4.03 Ω) as well as during the maintenance phase (48 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 2.86 ± 2.92 Ω; CB 3.43 ± 3.06 Ω). Once again the aggregometry results for CB showed a similarly high interindividual variability as also holds true for CHS. Some subjects had a better antiplatelet effect with clopidogrel besylate and vice versa with clopidogrel hydrogensulfate. Conclusion The crossover study using whole blood aggregometry and flow cytometry shows no overall significant difference in the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate as compared to clopidogrel besylate. However, it is important to note that besides high interindividual there is also high intraindividual variability between the two different clopidogrel formulas. We observed both: subjects responding less to besylate salt, but better to hydrogensulfate salt, and vice versa.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Platelet Activation - drug effects</subject><subject>Platelet Aggregation - drug effects</subject><subject>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ticlopidine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ticlopidine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1861-0684</issn><issn>1861-0692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u3CAURlHVqPl9gGxS1L2Te8HjQHfVqE0iRcoiyRphc5nxyDO4YFeatw-OR4266QKB4HzfRYexS4RrBLi9SQBSiwJA5yVlgZ_YCaoKC6i0-Pz3rMpjdprSBmCBIMsv7Bj1Akos8YR1y7DtbWx3Kz6sidvd0PadHaijgZP31Aw8eN50oW9dWEXq-HrvYljRLo2dz2COuH_ea0r7qeE7t7yJIaXwhyJPw-j25-zI2y7RxWE_Y6-_fr4s74vHp7uH5Y_HopG6HApcCK_I11R7qiWQlVQJVwlsFk45Z29FZctS1Aqmm9JnEmtntfa1F9JZeca-zb19DL9HSoPZhDHu8kijFEqldVVlCGfo_ZORvOlju7VxbxDMpNfMek3Waya9BnPm6lA81ltyH4mDzwyIGUj95JTix-T_tX6dQ94GY1exTeb1WQBKwEoJIYV8A9i0kd0</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Neubauer, Horst</creator><creator>Krüger, Jan Christopher</creator><creator>Lask, Sebastian</creator><creator>Endres, Heinz G</creator><creator>Pepinghege, Fenena</creator><creator>Engelhardt, Andreas</creator><creator>Bulut, Daniel</creator><creator>Mügge, Andreas</creator><general>Heidelberg : D. Steinkopff-Verlag</general><general>D. Steinkopff-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Comparing the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and clopidogrel besylate: a crossover study</title><author>Neubauer, Horst ; Krüger, Jan Christopher ; Lask, Sebastian ; Endres, Heinz G ; Pepinghege, Fenena ; Engelhardt, Andreas ; Bulut, Daniel ; Mügge, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-152f8efbebfeb30ea3e62d621c5d8dda726a442b801c5d4ffbe1bda99fbf23da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Platelet Activation - drug effects</topic><topic>Platelet Aggregation - drug effects</topic><topic>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ticlopidine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ticlopidine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Jan Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lask, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endres, Heinz G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepinghege, Fenena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulut, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mügge, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Clinical research in cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neubauer, Horst</au><au>Krüger, Jan Christopher</au><au>Lask, Sebastian</au><au>Endres, Heinz G</au><au>Pepinghege, Fenena</au><au>Engelhardt, Andreas</au><au>Bulut, Daniel</au><au>Mügge, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and clopidogrel besylate: a crossover study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical research in cardiology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Res Cardiol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Res Cardiol</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>533-540</pages><issn>1861-0684</issn><eissn>1861-0692</eissn><abstract>Background Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetyl salicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate, was approved in Germany as a “new drug” in May 2008. Only one study with 46 healthy men compared the plasma concentrations of both clopidogrel formulas. In our crossover study we measured the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS, clopidogrel bisulfate) and clopidogrel besylate (CB) using two techniques, whole blood impedance aggregometry and flow cytometry in healthy subjects. Methods Twenty-one healthy volunteers (14 male, 7 female, mean age 36.3 years) were treated either with CHS or CB (300 mg loading, followed by 75 mg/day) and after a wash-out period of at least 21 days, the participants were switched to the other clopidogrel salt in a crossover design. Blood samples were drawn before and 2, 4 and 48 h after the initial dose was taken. Flow cytometry measurements of CD62P (P-selectin) expression were done at baseline and 48 h thereafter with three different ADP concentrations (5, 15, 50 μmol/L ADP). Whole blood impedance aggregometry testing (Chrono-log Model 590) was performed at baseline and after 2, 4 and 48 h with two ADP concentrations (5 and 20 μmol/L ADP). Results Using flow cytometry, the mean inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on the CD62P expression was similar and no significant differences were noted in subjects treated with either of the clopidogrel formulas for hydrogensulfate or besylate salt (5 μmol/L ADP: 8.12 ± 5.53 CHS vs. 6.48 ± 5.01 CB; 15 μmol/L ADP: 9.33 ± 6.44 CHS vs. 8.99 ± 8.27 CB; 50 μmol/L ADP: 11.17 ± 6.81 CHS vs. 9.52 ± 6.17 CB). It is important to note that clopidogrel CB shows similar and conspicuously high interindividual variability as was reported earlier on CHS. We observed both possibilities, subjects responding less to the hydrogensulfate salt, but better to the besylate salt, and vice versa. Using aggregometry, both salt formulas achieved similar inhibitory effects regarding initial platelet function (2 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 4.5 ± 3.66 Ω; CB 3.89 ± 3.81 Ω and 4 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 5.78 ± 3.51 Ω; CB 4.89 ± 4.03 Ω) as well as during the maintenance phase (48 h/5 μmol/L ADP: CHS 2.86 ± 2.92 Ω; CB 3.43 ± 3.06 Ω). Once again the aggregometry results for CB showed a similarly high interindividual variability as also holds true for CHS. Some subjects had a better antiplatelet effect with clopidogrel besylate and vice versa with clopidogrel hydrogensulfate. Conclusion The crossover study using whole blood aggregometry and flow cytometry shows no overall significant difference in the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate as compared to clopidogrel besylate. However, it is important to note that besides high interindividual there is also high intraindividual variability between the two different clopidogrel formulas. We observed both: subjects responding less to besylate salt, but better to hydrogensulfate salt, and vice versa.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Heidelberg : D. Steinkopff-Verlag</pub><pmid>19504141</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00392-009-0033-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1861-0684 |
ispartof | Clinical research in cardiology, 2009-09, Vol.98 (9), p.533-540 |
issn | 1861-0684 1861-0692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_881389966 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adult Cardiology Cross-Over Studies Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Female Flow cytometry Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Paper Platelet Activation - drug effects Platelet Aggregation - drug effects Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration & dosage Ticlopidine - administration & dosage Ticlopidine - analogs & derivatives Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Comparing the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and clopidogrel besylate: a crossover study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A51%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20antiplatelet%20effect%20of%20clopidogrel%20hydrogensulfate%20and%20clopidogrel%20besylate:%20a%20crossover%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20research%20in%20cardiology&rft.au=Neubauer,%20Horst&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=533-540&rft.issn=1861-0684&rft.eissn=1861-0692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00392-009-0033-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418685001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-152f8efbebfeb30ea3e62d621c5d8dda726a442b801c5d4ffbe1bda99fbf23da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881389966&rft_id=info:pmid/19504141&rfr_iscdi=true |