Issues in Conducting Cross-Cultural Research: Implementation of an Agreed International Procotol Designed by the WHOQOL Group for the Conduct of Focus Groups Eliciting the Quality of Life of Older Adults

Multi-centre and cross-cultural research require the use of common protocols if the results are to be either pooled or compared. All too often adherence to protocols is not discussed in reports and where it is reported poor adherence is frequently noted. This paper discusses the use of international...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quality of life research 2006-09, Vol.15 (7), p.1257-1270
Main Authors: Hawthorne, Graeme, Davidson, Natasha, Quinn, Kathryn, McCrate, Farah, Winkler, Ines, Lucas, Ramona, Kilian, Reinhold, Molzahn, Anita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age
Cross cultural studies
Demography
Focus groups
Group development
Health status
Instrument Development and Evaluation
Medical personnel
Older adults
Older people
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Research studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Multi-centre and cross-cultural research require the use of common protocols if the results are to be either pooled or compared. All too often adherence to protocols is not discussed in reports and where it is reported poor adherence is frequently noted. This paper discusses the use of international guidelines developed by WHOQOL Field Centres to conduct and report focus groups aimed at eliciting key concepts of quality of life among older adults. This was the first step in the development of the WHOQOL-OLD instrument. Although there was overall adherence to the agreed guidelines, there were some differences in the level of reporting, even after participating Field Centres had the opportunity to explain their reports. The reasons for these discrepancies are reported. It is concluded that because of local situations, it is difficult to achieve identical implementation of multi-centre cross-cultural protocols and that the highest standards of auditing are required if findings are to be compared. Suggestions for how such protocols can be improved are given.
ISSN:0962-9343
1573-2649
DOI:10.1007/s11136-006-0062-4