Loading…
Diversity and diversity policy: diving into fundamental differences
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to offer scholars an analytical framework to identify what the fundamental choices are in the definition of diversity (the what), in the motivation for diversity within organisations (the why), and in diversity policy as an organisational strategy (the how). It...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of organizational change management 2011-01, Vol.24 (5), p.680-694 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fe8b108b384898f6dc3722381f68cb120162eaf6a60a5d8f7135012c973d1dd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fe8b108b384898f6dc3722381f68cb120162eaf6a60a5d8f7135012c973d1dd3 |
container_end_page | 694 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 680 |
container_title | Journal of organizational change management |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | van Ewijk, Anne R |
description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to offer scholars an analytical framework to identify what the fundamental choices are in the definition of diversity (the what), in the motivation for diversity within organisations (the why), and in diversity policy as an organisational strategy (the how). It also hopes to stimulate diversity professionals to reflect upon the underlying assumptions of their policies and, if needed, provide inspiration as to how to align them towards a more coherent approach.Design methodology approach - Academic contributions from political, social and management theory on diversity and diversity policy are analyzed on their conceptual coherence to identify important research gaps and construct an analytical framework that can serve to fill these gaps.Findings - Although increasing societal diversity challenges many organisations to change and facilitate diversity within their structures, defining diversity and diversity policy is an uncommon habit both in the professional practice and in academic studies, while this definition influences the scope and validity of research results and can have a considerable impact on the practical consequences of diversity initiatives. The few studies in this field tend to be quantitative and jump to explanations for differences. The proposed analytical framework contains fundamental choices in the definition of diversity (the selection, interpretation, and categorization of modes of differentiation), the motivation for diversity within organisations (the desired base of difference is individual or collective, and arguments are moral or practical), and the diversity policy approach (the intensity is high or low, and the relevance of collective difference is high or low).Originality value - A theoretical exploration of the concept of diversity and diversity policy draws on sources from three distinct disciplines that have not been combined in such a way before, resulting in a new analytical framework that facilitates theory building and policy learning on the topic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/09534811111158921 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_888252939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447568941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fe8b108b384898f6dc3722381f68cb120162eaf6a60a5d8f7135012c973d1dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7hVXLhQiJM2dbih8SlN4rJ7lOUDderHSFqk_Xsyhjgw8MXy6-e1LRNyDvQagOINlSUvEL6iRMnggEygKjGvEMQhmWz7eQKKY3IS44pSWokKJ2R2X3-4EOthk-nOZvanWvdNbTa3W6Xu3rK6G_rMj53VresG3STdexdcZ1w8JUdeN9GdfecpWTw-LGbP-fz16WV2N89NAXzIvcNlOnXJsUCJXljDK8Y4ghdolsAoCOa0F1pQXVr0FfCSAjOy4has5VNyuRu7Dv376OKg2joa1zS6c_0YlWSCg5S0TOTFL3LVj6FLtylEZCWTXCYIdpAJfYzBebUOdavDRgFV25-qvZ8mz9XO41oXdGN_LHuoWlufcPo3_v-GT9CQg84</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888252939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity and diversity policy: diving into fundamental differences</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>van Ewijk, Anne R</creator><creatorcontrib>van Ewijk, Anne R</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to offer scholars an analytical framework to identify what the fundamental choices are in the definition of diversity (the what), in the motivation for diversity within organisations (the why), and in diversity policy as an organisational strategy (the how). It also hopes to stimulate diversity professionals to reflect upon the underlying assumptions of their policies and, if needed, provide inspiration as to how to align them towards a more coherent approach.Design methodology approach - Academic contributions from political, social and management theory on diversity and diversity policy are analyzed on their conceptual coherence to identify important research gaps and construct an analytical framework that can serve to fill these gaps.Findings - Although increasing societal diversity challenges many organisations to change and facilitate diversity within their structures, defining diversity and diversity policy is an uncommon habit both in the professional practice and in academic studies, while this definition influences the scope and validity of research results and can have a considerable impact on the practical consequences of diversity initiatives. The few studies in this field tend to be quantitative and jump to explanations for differences. The proposed analytical framework contains fundamental choices in the definition of diversity (the selection, interpretation, and categorization of modes of differentiation), the motivation for diversity within organisations (the desired base of difference is individual or collective, and arguments are moral or practical), and the diversity policy approach (the intensity is high or low, and the relevance of collective difference is high or low).Originality value - A theoretical exploration of the concept of diversity and diversity policy draws on sources from three distinct disciplines that have not been combined in such a way before, resulting in a new analytical framework that facilitates theory building and policy learning on the topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-4814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/09534811111158921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Coherence ; Gaps ; Immigration ; Inspiration ; Learning ; Mathematical analysis ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Noncitizens ; Organizational change ; Policies ; R&D ; Research & development ; Social construction ; Strategy ; Studies ; Theory ; Trends ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational change management, 2011-01, Vol.24 (5), p.680-694</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fe8b108b384898f6dc3722381f68cb120162eaf6a60a5d8f7135012c973d1dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fe8b108b384898f6dc3722381f68cb120162eaf6a60a5d8f7135012c973d1dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/888252939/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/888252939?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,27923,27924,36059,36060,44362,74666</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Ewijk, Anne R</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity and diversity policy: diving into fundamental differences</title><title>Journal of organizational change management</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to offer scholars an analytical framework to identify what the fundamental choices are in the definition of diversity (the what), in the motivation for diversity within organisations (the why), and in diversity policy as an organisational strategy (the how). It also hopes to stimulate diversity professionals to reflect upon the underlying assumptions of their policies and, if needed, provide inspiration as to how to align them towards a more coherent approach.Design methodology approach - Academic contributions from political, social and management theory on diversity and diversity policy are analyzed on their conceptual coherence to identify important research gaps and construct an analytical framework that can serve to fill these gaps.Findings - Although increasing societal diversity challenges many organisations to change and facilitate diversity within their structures, defining diversity and diversity policy is an uncommon habit both in the professional practice and in academic studies, while this definition influences the scope and validity of research results and can have a considerable impact on the practical consequences of diversity initiatives. The few studies in this field tend to be quantitative and jump to explanations for differences. The proposed analytical framework contains fundamental choices in the definition of diversity (the selection, interpretation, and categorization of modes of differentiation), the motivation for diversity within organisations (the desired base of difference is individual or collective, and arguments are moral or practical), and the diversity policy approach (the intensity is high or low, and the relevance of collective difference is high or low).Originality value - A theoretical exploration of the concept of diversity and diversity policy draws on sources from three distinct disciplines that have not been combined in such a way before, resulting in a new analytical framework that facilitates theory building and policy learning on the topic.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Gaps</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Inspiration</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Social construction</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0953-4814</issn><issn>1758-7816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwA7hVXLhQiJM2dbih8SlN4rJ7lOUDderHSFqk_Xsyhjgw8MXy6-e1LRNyDvQagOINlSUvEL6iRMnggEygKjGvEMQhmWz7eQKKY3IS44pSWokKJ2R2X3-4EOthk-nOZvanWvdNbTa3W6Xu3rK6G_rMj53VresG3STdexdcZ1w8JUdeN9GdfecpWTw-LGbP-fz16WV2N89NAXzIvcNlOnXJsUCJXljDK8Y4ghdolsAoCOa0F1pQXVr0FfCSAjOy4has5VNyuRu7Dv376OKg2joa1zS6c_0YlWSCg5S0TOTFL3LVj6FLtylEZCWTXCYIdpAJfYzBebUOdavDRgFV25-qvZ8mz9XO41oXdGN_LHuoWlufcPo3_v-GT9CQg84</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>van Ewijk, Anne R</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Diversity and diversity policy: diving into fundamental differences</title><author>van Ewijk, Anne R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fe8b108b384898f6dc3722381f68cb120162eaf6a60a5d8f7135012c973d1dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Gaps</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Inspiration</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Social construction</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Ewijk, Anne R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational change management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Ewijk, Anne R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity and diversity policy: diving into fundamental differences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational change management</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>680</spage><epage>694</epage><pages>680-694</pages><issn>0953-4814</issn><eissn>1758-7816</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to offer scholars an analytical framework to identify what the fundamental choices are in the definition of diversity (the what), in the motivation for diversity within organisations (the why), and in diversity policy as an organisational strategy (the how). It also hopes to stimulate diversity professionals to reflect upon the underlying assumptions of their policies and, if needed, provide inspiration as to how to align them towards a more coherent approach.Design methodology approach - Academic contributions from political, social and management theory on diversity and diversity policy are analyzed on their conceptual coherence to identify important research gaps and construct an analytical framework that can serve to fill these gaps.Findings - Although increasing societal diversity challenges many organisations to change and facilitate diversity within their structures, defining diversity and diversity policy is an uncommon habit both in the professional practice and in academic studies, while this definition influences the scope and validity of research results and can have a considerable impact on the practical consequences of diversity initiatives. The few studies in this field tend to be quantitative and jump to explanations for differences. The proposed analytical framework contains fundamental choices in the definition of diversity (the selection, interpretation, and categorization of modes of differentiation), the motivation for diversity within organisations (the desired base of difference is individual or collective, and arguments are moral or practical), and the diversity policy approach (the intensity is high or low, and the relevance of collective difference is high or low).Originality value - A theoretical exploration of the concept of diversity and diversity policy draws on sources from three distinct disciplines that have not been combined in such a way before, resulting in a new analytical framework that facilitates theory building and policy learning on the topic.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/09534811111158921</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0953-4814 |
ispartof | Journal of organizational change management, 2011-01, Vol.24 (5), p.680-694 |
issn | 0953-4814 1758-7816 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_888252939 |
source | ABI/INFORM Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Academic disciplines Coherence Gaps Immigration Inspiration Learning Mathematical analysis Multiculturalism & pluralism Noncitizens Organizational change Policies R&D Research & development Social construction Strategy Studies Theory Trends Validity |
title | Diversity and diversity policy: diving into fundamental differences |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A56%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20and%20diversity%20policy:%20diving%20into%20fundamental%20differences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20change%20management&rft.au=van%20Ewijk,%20Anne%20R&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=680&rft.epage=694&rft.pages=680-694&rft.issn=0953-4814&rft.eissn=1758-7816&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/09534811111158921&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2447568941%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-fe8b108b384898f6dc3722381f68cb120162eaf6a60a5d8f7135012c973d1dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888252939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |