Loading…

Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case

ABSTRACT This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for ret...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis 2010-09, Vol.17 (5-6), p.155-166
Main Authors: Bravo, Mila, Pla-Santamaria, David, Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23
container_end_page 166
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 155
container_title Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis
container_volume 17
creator Bravo, Mila
Pla-Santamaria, David
Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana
description ABSTRACT This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mcda.460
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_893424880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465456711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AiCs4p-CcET146X5qkabzVqZuw6cCJgocQsmSrts1MWnT_vR0TwYOn9w4f3o9vFJ1iGGCA5KLSCzWgKexFPQxCxJiksL_tGY9FgulhdBTCGwBkjNBe9DpzvrGuLBx6NKXRTeFqZL2r0LQtm2JdGnRlar2qlH8PlyhHI6dKNPNu6VVVFfUS5eu1d0qvUOOQqlGum7YTQxXMcXRgVRnMyU_tR0-3N_PhOJ48jO6G-STWhADEDLClLGWYgwDOCV0oBQQbtUgsTjXPVKoEMGoN05pxi0UqMiowYA2G2oT0o7Pd3O6Qj9aERr651tfdSpkJQhOaZdCh8x3S3oXgjZVrX3RfbSQGuU1ObpOTXXIdjXf0syjN5l8np8Pr_I8vQmO-fn2XmEw54Uw-34_kmKfzF5IQOSPfjIt8wg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893424880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Bravo, Mila ; Pla-Santamaria, David ; Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Mila ; Pla-Santamaria, David ; Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mcda.460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>benchmark ; Benchmarks ; finance ; Goal programming ; investment ; Investment policy ; multi-objective ; Rates of return ; Studies ; Utility functions</subject><ispartof>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2010-09, Vol.17 (5-6), p.155-166</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Sep-Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Mila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla-Santamaria, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</title><title>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</title><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>benchmark</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>finance</subject><subject>Goal programming</subject><subject>investment</subject><subject>Investment policy</subject><subject>multi-objective</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><issn>1057-9214</issn><issn>1099-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AiCs4p-CcET146X5qkabzVqZuw6cCJgocQsmSrts1MWnT_vR0TwYOn9w4f3o9vFJ1iGGCA5KLSCzWgKexFPQxCxJiksL_tGY9FgulhdBTCGwBkjNBe9DpzvrGuLBx6NKXRTeFqZL2r0LQtm2JdGnRlar2qlH8PlyhHI6dKNPNu6VVVFfUS5eu1d0qvUOOQqlGum7YTQxXMcXRgVRnMyU_tR0-3N_PhOJ48jO6G-STWhADEDLClLGWYgwDOCV0oBQQbtUgsTjXPVKoEMGoN05pxi0UqMiowYA2G2oT0o7Pd3O6Qj9aERr651tfdSpkJQhOaZdCh8x3S3oXgjZVrX3RfbSQGuU1ObpOTXXIdjXf0syjN5l8np8Pr_I8vQmO-fn2XmEw54Uw-34_kmKfzF5IQOSPfjIt8wg</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Bravo, Mila</creator><creator>Pla-Santamaria, David</creator><creator>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</title><author>Bravo, Mila ; Pla-Santamaria, David ; Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>benchmark</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>finance</topic><topic>Goal programming</topic><topic>investment</topic><topic>Investment policy</topic><topic>multi-objective</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Mila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla-Santamaria, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravo, Mila</au><au>Pla-Santamaria, David</au><au>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>155-166</pages><issn>1057-9214</issn><eissn>1099-1360</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/mcda.460</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9214
ispartof Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2010-09, Vol.17 (5-6), p.155-166
issn 1057-9214
1099-1360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_893424880
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley
subjects benchmark
Benchmarks
finance
Goal programming
investment
Investment policy
multi-objective
Rates of return
Studies
Utility functions
title Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A43%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portfolio%20Selection%20from%20Multiple%20Benchmarks:%20A%20Goal%20Programming%20Approach%20to%20an%20Actual%20Case&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multi-criteria%20decision%20analysis&rft.au=Bravo,%20Mila&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=155-166&rft.issn=1057-9214&rft.eissn=1099-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mcda.460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465456711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893424880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true