Loading…
Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case
ABSTRACT This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for ret...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis 2010-09, Vol.17 (5-6), p.155-166 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23 |
container_end_page | 166 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Bravo, Mila Pla-Santamaria, David Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana |
description | ABSTRACT
This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mcda.460 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_893424880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2465456711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AiCs4p-CcET146X5qkabzVqZuw6cCJgocQsmSrts1MWnT_vR0TwYOn9w4f3o9vFJ1iGGCA5KLSCzWgKexFPQxCxJiksL_tGY9FgulhdBTCGwBkjNBe9DpzvrGuLBx6NKXRTeFqZL2r0LQtm2JdGnRlar2qlH8PlyhHI6dKNPNu6VVVFfUS5eu1d0qvUOOQqlGum7YTQxXMcXRgVRnMyU_tR0-3N_PhOJ48jO6G-STWhADEDLClLGWYgwDOCV0oBQQbtUgsTjXPVKoEMGoN05pxi0UqMiowYA2G2oT0o7Pd3O6Qj9aERr651tfdSpkJQhOaZdCh8x3S3oXgjZVrX3RfbSQGuU1ObpOTXXIdjXf0syjN5l8np8Pr_I8vQmO-fn2XmEw54Uw-34_kmKfzF5IQOSPfjIt8wg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893424880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Bravo, Mila ; Pla-Santamaria, David ; Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Mila ; Pla-Santamaria, David ; Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mcda.460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>benchmark ; Benchmarks ; finance ; Goal programming ; investment ; Investment policy ; multi-objective ; Rates of return ; Studies ; Utility functions</subject><ispartof>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2010-09, Vol.17 (5-6), p.155-166</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Sep-Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Mila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla-Santamaria, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</title><title>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</title><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>benchmark</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>finance</subject><subject>Goal programming</subject><subject>investment</subject><subject>Investment policy</subject><subject>multi-objective</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><issn>1057-9214</issn><issn>1099-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AiCs4p-CcET146X5qkabzVqZuw6cCJgocQsmSrts1MWnT_vR0TwYOn9w4f3o9vFJ1iGGCA5KLSCzWgKexFPQxCxJiksL_tGY9FgulhdBTCGwBkjNBe9DpzvrGuLBx6NKXRTeFqZL2r0LQtm2JdGnRlar2qlH8PlyhHI6dKNPNu6VVVFfUS5eu1d0qvUOOQqlGum7YTQxXMcXRgVRnMyU_tR0-3N_PhOJ48jO6G-STWhADEDLClLGWYgwDOCV0oBQQbtUgsTjXPVKoEMGoN05pxi0UqMiowYA2G2oT0o7Pd3O6Qj9aERr651tfdSpkJQhOaZdCh8x3S3oXgjZVrX3RfbSQGuU1ObpOTXXIdjXf0syjN5l8np8Pr_I8vQmO-fn2XmEw54Uw-34_kmKfzF5IQOSPfjIt8wg</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Bravo, Mila</creator><creator>Pla-Santamaria, David</creator><creator>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</title><author>Bravo, Mila ; Pla-Santamaria, David ; Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>benchmark</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>finance</topic><topic>Goal programming</topic><topic>investment</topic><topic>Investment policy</topic><topic>multi-objective</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Mila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pla-Santamaria, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravo, Mila</au><au>Pla-Santamaria, David</au><au>Garcia-Bernabeu, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal</addtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>155-166</pages><issn>1057-9214</issn><eissn>1099-1360</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
This paper deals with benchmark‐based portfolio choice for buy‐and‐hold strategies of investing. Multiple benchmarks for returns are considered, which is more realistic than taking a unique benchmark – a unique aspiration difficult to select in practice among the various aspirations for returns that the investor has in mind. Portfolio selection with multiple benchmarks leads to a multi‐objective problem, which is addressed by mean value – stochastic goal programming. In particular, two benchmarks are considered, which involves two goals. Weights for goals depend on investor's preferences and Arrow's absolute risk aversion coefficients. An efficient frontier of portfolios is obtained. Advantages of this stochastic method in our context are as follows: (i) Mean value‐stochastic goal programming relies on classical utility theory under uncertainty and Arrow's absolute risk aversion, which ensures soundness and strictness, and (ii) the numerical model is easily solved by using available software such as mean–variance software. Numerical results are tabulated and discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/mcda.460</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9214 |
ispartof | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2010-09, Vol.17 (5-6), p.155-166 |
issn | 1057-9214 1099-1360 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_893424880 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley |
subjects | benchmark Benchmarks finance Goal programming investment Investment policy multi-objective Rates of return Studies Utility functions |
title | Portfolio Selection from Multiple Benchmarks: A Goal Programming Approach to an Actual Case |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A43%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portfolio%20Selection%20from%20Multiple%20Benchmarks:%20A%20Goal%20Programming%20Approach%20to%20an%20Actual%20Case&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multi-criteria%20decision%20analysis&rft.au=Bravo,%20Mila&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=155-166&rft.issn=1057-9214&rft.eissn=1099-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mcda.460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2465456711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-501f4565170907734daa031ead2f16c78a6a9054fe5cc57f1969849101c0e4f23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893424880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |