Loading…

Notonectids as Live Food for Olive Barb, Puntius Sarana

A feeding experiment was conducted in 40-L tanks each stocked with four fry of olive barb (2.05 ± 0.22 g). Dead notonectids (T1), live notonectids (T2), co-feeding of live notonectids and prepared diet (T3), prepared diet (T4), and plankton concentrate (T5) were fed ad libitum as the five treatments...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied aquaculture 2011-07, Vol.23 (3), p.231-237
Main Authors: Das, Pratap Chandra, Jena, Joykrushna, Singh, Tarun Kumar, Kar, Samarjit, Mitra, Gopa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-f4c8641be4d535a8af0642881ce85755bb4122754f55ce8ac7ea6e7878588ba03
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 231
container_title Journal of applied aquaculture
container_volume 23
creator Das, Pratap Chandra
Jena, Joykrushna
Singh, Tarun Kumar
Kar, Samarjit
Mitra, Gopa
description A feeding experiment was conducted in 40-L tanks each stocked with four fry of olive barb (2.05 ± 0.22 g). Dead notonectids (T1), live notonectids (T2), co-feeding of live notonectids and prepared diet (T3), prepared diet (T4), and plankton concentrate (T5) were fed ad libitum as the five treatments, each maintained with four replications. Proximate composition revealed higher protein and crude lipid contents in both notonectids and plankton concentrate compared to the prepared diet. The insect consumption rate was significantly higher with provision of dead insects (T1), followed by co-feeding of live insect and prepared diet (T3), and the live form (T2) (P < 0.05). Fry showed significantly higher final body weight and net weight gain, as well as specific growth rate, in co-fed group compared to those provided with live or dead insects. Growth performances decreased significantly when fed with prepared diet or plankton concentrate alone. While olive barb fry exhibited a preference for notonectids over the other diets, co-feeding appeared to offer a better nutritional profile for achieving higher growth. The study also indicated possibility of using olive barb as a good candidate for in situ biological control of notonectids during fingerling rearing of barbs and carps.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10454438.2011.600631
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_898531426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>902370846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-f4c8641be4d535a8af0642881ce85755bb4122754f55ce8ac7ea6e7878588ba03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUgIMoOKf_gYfixYudL03SvJ1Eh1NhOEE9hzRNoaNrZtIq--9NqV48eHq_vvd4fIScU5hRQLimwAXnDGcZUDrLAXJGD8iECi7SOBeHMY9IOjDH5CSEDQBFKXFC5LPrXGtNV5ch0SFZ1Z82WTpXJpXzyboZyjvti6vkpW-7ug_Jq_a61afkqNJNsGc_cUrel_dvi8d0tX54WtyuUpMx6NKKG8w5LSwvBRMadQU5zxCpsSikEEXBaZZJwSshYksbaXVuJUoUiIUGNiWX492ddx-9DZ3a1sHYptGtdX1Qc8iYBOR5JC_-kBvX-zY-p3COglGeDRAfIeNdCN5WaufrrfZ7RUENLtWvSzW4VKPLuHYzrtVt1LLVX843per0vnG-ijpMHRT798I3yFh3og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898531426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Notonectids as Live Food for Olive Barb, Puntius Sarana</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Das, Pratap Chandra ; Jena, Joykrushna ; Singh, Tarun Kumar ; Kar, Samarjit ; Mitra, Gopa</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Pratap Chandra ; Jena, Joykrushna ; Singh, Tarun Kumar ; Kar, Samarjit ; Mitra, Gopa</creatorcontrib><description>A feeding experiment was conducted in 40-L tanks each stocked with four fry of olive barb (2.05 ± 0.22 g). Dead notonectids (T1), live notonectids (T2), co-feeding of live notonectids and prepared diet (T3), prepared diet (T4), and plankton concentrate (T5) were fed ad libitum as the five treatments, each maintained with four replications. Proximate composition revealed higher protein and crude lipid contents in both notonectids and plankton concentrate compared to the prepared diet. The insect consumption rate was significantly higher with provision of dead insects (T1), followed by co-feeding of live insect and prepared diet (T3), and the live form (T2) (P &lt; 0.05). Fry showed significantly higher final body weight and net weight gain, as well as specific growth rate, in co-fed group compared to those provided with live or dead insects. Growth performances decreased significantly when fed with prepared diet or plankton concentrate alone. While olive barb fry exhibited a preference for notonectids over the other diets, co-feeding appeared to offer a better nutritional profile for achieving higher growth. The study also indicated possibility of using olive barb as a good candidate for in situ biological control of notonectids during fingerling rearing of barbs and carps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-4438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-0805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10454438.2011.600631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Diet ; fingerling ; Fish ; Foraging behavior ; Freshwater ; insect control ; Insects ; notonectids ; Predation ; Puntius sarana</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied aquaculture, 2011-07, Vol.23 (3), p.231-237</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-f4c8641be4d535a8af0642881ce85755bb4122754f55ce8ac7ea6e7878588ba03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Pratap Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jena, Joykrushna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Tarun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kar, Samarjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitra, Gopa</creatorcontrib><title>Notonectids as Live Food for Olive Barb, Puntius Sarana</title><title>Journal of applied aquaculture</title><description>A feeding experiment was conducted in 40-L tanks each stocked with four fry of olive barb (2.05 ± 0.22 g). Dead notonectids (T1), live notonectids (T2), co-feeding of live notonectids and prepared diet (T3), prepared diet (T4), and plankton concentrate (T5) were fed ad libitum as the five treatments, each maintained with four replications. Proximate composition revealed higher protein and crude lipid contents in both notonectids and plankton concentrate compared to the prepared diet. The insect consumption rate was significantly higher with provision of dead insects (T1), followed by co-feeding of live insect and prepared diet (T3), and the live form (T2) (P &lt; 0.05). Fry showed significantly higher final body weight and net weight gain, as well as specific growth rate, in co-fed group compared to those provided with live or dead insects. Growth performances decreased significantly when fed with prepared diet or plankton concentrate alone. While olive barb fry exhibited a preference for notonectids over the other diets, co-feeding appeared to offer a better nutritional profile for achieving higher growth. The study also indicated possibility of using olive barb as a good candidate for in situ biological control of notonectids during fingerling rearing of barbs and carps.</description><subject>Diet</subject><subject>fingerling</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>insect control</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>notonectids</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Puntius sarana</subject><issn>1045-4438</issn><issn>1545-0805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUgIMoOKf_gYfixYudL03SvJ1Eh1NhOEE9hzRNoaNrZtIq--9NqV48eHq_vvd4fIScU5hRQLimwAXnDGcZUDrLAXJGD8iECi7SOBeHMY9IOjDH5CSEDQBFKXFC5LPrXGtNV5ch0SFZ1Z82WTpXJpXzyboZyjvti6vkpW-7ug_Jq_a61afkqNJNsGc_cUrel_dvi8d0tX54WtyuUpMx6NKKG8w5LSwvBRMadQU5zxCpsSikEEXBaZZJwSshYksbaXVuJUoUiIUGNiWX492ddx-9DZ3a1sHYptGtdX1Qc8iYBOR5JC_-kBvX-zY-p3COglGeDRAfIeNdCN5WaufrrfZ7RUENLtWvSzW4VKPLuHYzrtVt1LLVX843per0vnG-ijpMHRT798I3yFh3og</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Das, Pratap Chandra</creator><creator>Jena, Joykrushna</creator><creator>Singh, Tarun Kumar</creator><creator>Kar, Samarjit</creator><creator>Mitra, Gopa</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Notonectids as Live Food for Olive Barb, Puntius Sarana</title><author>Das, Pratap Chandra ; Jena, Joykrushna ; Singh, Tarun Kumar ; Kar, Samarjit ; Mitra, Gopa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-f4c8641be4d535a8af0642881ce85755bb4122754f55ce8ac7ea6e7878588ba03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Diet</topic><topic>fingerling</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>insect control</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>notonectids</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Puntius sarana</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Pratap Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jena, Joykrushna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Tarun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kar, Samarjit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitra, Gopa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Pratap Chandra</au><au>Jena, Joykrushna</au><au>Singh, Tarun Kumar</au><au>Kar, Samarjit</au><au>Mitra, Gopa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Notonectids as Live Food for Olive Barb, Puntius Sarana</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied aquaculture</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>231-237</pages><issn>1045-4438</issn><eissn>1545-0805</eissn><abstract>A feeding experiment was conducted in 40-L tanks each stocked with four fry of olive barb (2.05 ± 0.22 g). Dead notonectids (T1), live notonectids (T2), co-feeding of live notonectids and prepared diet (T3), prepared diet (T4), and plankton concentrate (T5) were fed ad libitum as the five treatments, each maintained with four replications. Proximate composition revealed higher protein and crude lipid contents in both notonectids and plankton concentrate compared to the prepared diet. The insect consumption rate was significantly higher with provision of dead insects (T1), followed by co-feeding of live insect and prepared diet (T3), and the live form (T2) (P &lt; 0.05). Fry showed significantly higher final body weight and net weight gain, as well as specific growth rate, in co-fed group compared to those provided with live or dead insects. Growth performances decreased significantly when fed with prepared diet or plankton concentrate alone. While olive barb fry exhibited a preference for notonectids over the other diets, co-feeding appeared to offer a better nutritional profile for achieving higher growth. The study also indicated possibility of using olive barb as a good candidate for in situ biological control of notonectids during fingerling rearing of barbs and carps.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/10454438.2011.600631</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-4438
ispartof Journal of applied aquaculture, 2011-07, Vol.23 (3), p.231-237
issn 1045-4438
1545-0805
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_898531426
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Diet
fingerling
Fish
Foraging behavior
Freshwater
insect control
Insects
notonectids
Predation
Puntius sarana
title Notonectids as Live Food for Olive Barb, Puntius Sarana
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Notonectids%20as%20Live%20Food%20for%20Olive%20Barb,%20Puntius%20Sarana&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20aquaculture&rft.au=Das,%20Pratap%20Chandra&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=231-237&rft.issn=1045-4438&rft.eissn=1545-0805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10454438.2011.600631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902370846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-f4c8641be4d535a8af0642881ce85755bb4122754f55ce8ac7ea6e7878588ba03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898531426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true