Loading…

Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem

A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:School science and mathematics 2011-12, Vol.111 (8), p.389-398
Main Authors: Ross, Dan, Reys, Robert, Chávez, Óscar, McNaught, Melissa D., Grouws, Douglas A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993
container_end_page 398
container_issue 8
container_start_page 389
container_title School science and mathematics
container_volume 111
creator Ross, Dan
Reys, Robert
Chávez, Óscar
McNaught, Melissa D.
Grouws, Douglas A.
description A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_909499099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ958349</ericid><sourcerecordid>2530720001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gljHCexxKZUUKjKQwQEYmM5zqSklKbYqWj_HoegrpmFH5o51_IhhDIIma_TWchkJINUyCg8A8ZCAAZRuN4hvW1jl_QAeBzEKfB9cuDcDHxxED1ykTWrAhcNzRqrG5xu6PC9rgw6Wi-opsN64Rq7Mg0W9BHd0l-RDuZTzK2mD7bO5_h5SPZKPXd49Lf3yfPV5dPwOpjcj26Gg0lguEyj4Cw3DFBCAghFHidSFCYREZqkkDzWXLKS6RRQFILLKCrL2EjNy0KjSFkuJe-Tky53aeuvFbpGzeqVXfgnlQT_Vb-0Q2k3ZGztnMVSLW31qe1GMVCtMDVTrRfVelGtMPUrTK09etyhaCuzxS7HUqQ8apPPu_Z3NcfNv2NVlt36g8eDDq9cg-stru2HihOeCPVyN1LjVyHf7jKuJvwHUVeI-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>909499099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Ross, Dan ; Reys, Robert ; Chávez, Óscar ; McNaught, Melissa D. ; Grouws, Douglas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, Dan ; Reys, Robert ; Chávez, Óscar ; McNaught, Melissa D. ; Grouws, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><description>A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-6803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-8594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Algebra ; Cognitive Style ; Critical Thinking ; Educational Strategies ; Elementary education ; Grade 10 ; Grade 8 ; Grade 9 ; Learning ; Learning Strategies ; Longitudinal Studies ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical Applications ; Mathematical Aptitude ; Mathematical problems ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Achievement ; Mathematics education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematics Skills ; Problem Sets ; Problem Solving ; School Districts ; Secondary School Mathematics ; Secondary school students ; Student Improvement ; Students ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>School science and mathematics, 2011-12, Vol.111 (8), p.389-398</ispartof><rights>2011, School Science and Mathematics Association</rights><rights>Copyright School Science and Mathematics Association, Incorporated Dec 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ958349$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reys, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaught, Melissa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grouws, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</title><title>School science and mathematics</title><description>A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Algebra</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical Applications</subject><subject>Mathematical Aptitude</subject><subject>Mathematical problems</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Skills</subject><subject>Problem Sets</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Secondary School Mathematics</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>0036-6803</issn><issn>1949-8594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gljHCexxKZUUKjKQwQEYmM5zqSklKbYqWj_HoegrpmFH5o51_IhhDIIma_TWchkJINUyCg8A8ZCAAZRuN4hvW1jl_QAeBzEKfB9cuDcDHxxED1ykTWrAhcNzRqrG5xu6PC9rgw6Wi-opsN64Rq7Mg0W9BHd0l-RDuZTzK2mD7bO5_h5SPZKPXd49Lf3yfPV5dPwOpjcj26Gg0lguEyj4Cw3DFBCAghFHidSFCYREZqkkDzWXLKS6RRQFILLKCrL2EjNy0KjSFkuJe-Tky53aeuvFbpGzeqVXfgnlQT_Vb-0Q2k3ZGztnMVSLW31qe1GMVCtMDVTrRfVelGtMPUrTK09etyhaCuzxS7HUqQ8apPPu_Z3NcfNv2NVlt36g8eDDq9cg-stru2HihOeCPVyN1LjVyHf7jKuJvwHUVeI-Q</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Ross, Dan</creator><creator>Reys, Robert</creator><creator>Chávez, Óscar</creator><creator>McNaught, Melissa D.</creator><creator>Grouws, Douglas A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</title><author>Ross, Dan ; Reys, Robert ; Chávez, Óscar ; McNaught, Melissa D. ; Grouws, Douglas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Algebra</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical Applications</topic><topic>Mathematical Aptitude</topic><topic>Mathematical problems</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Skills</topic><topic>Problem Sets</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Secondary School Mathematics</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reys, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaught, Melissa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grouws, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>School science and mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, Dan</au><au>Reys, Robert</au><au>Chávez, Óscar</au><au>McNaught, Melissa D.</au><au>Grouws, Douglas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ958349</ericid><atitle>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</atitle><jtitle>School science and mathematics</jtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>389-398</pages><issn>0036-6803</issn><eissn>1949-8594</eissn><abstract>A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-6803
ispartof School science and mathematics, 2011-12, Vol.111 (8), p.389-398
issn 0036-6803
1949-8594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_909499099
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects Achievement Gains
Algebra
Cognitive Style
Critical Thinking
Educational Strategies
Elementary education
Grade 10
Grade 8
Grade 9
Learning
Learning Strategies
Longitudinal Studies
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical Applications
Mathematical Aptitude
Mathematical problems
Mathematics
Mathematics Achievement
Mathematics education
Mathematics Instruction
Mathematics Skills
Problem Sets
Problem Solving
School Districts
Secondary School Mathematics
Secondary school students
Student Improvement
Students
Thinking Skills
title Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A39%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20Strategy%20Choices%20on%20a%20Constructed%20Response%20Algebra%20Problem&rft.jtitle=School%20science%20and%20mathematics&rft.au=Ross,%20Dan&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=389-398&rft.issn=0036-6803&rft.eissn=1949-8594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2530720001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=909499099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ958349&rfr_iscdi=true