Loading…
Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem
A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five...
Saved in:
Published in: | School science and mathematics 2011-12, Vol.111 (8), p.389-398 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993 |
container_end_page | 398 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 389 |
container_title | School science and mathematics |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Ross, Dan Reys, Robert Chávez, Óscar McNaught, Melissa D. Grouws, Douglas A. |
description | A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_909499099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ958349</ericid><sourcerecordid>2530720001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gljHCexxKZUUKjKQwQEYmM5zqSklKbYqWj_HoegrpmFH5o51_IhhDIIma_TWchkJINUyCg8A8ZCAAZRuN4hvW1jl_QAeBzEKfB9cuDcDHxxED1ykTWrAhcNzRqrG5xu6PC9rgw6Wi-opsN64Rq7Mg0W9BHd0l-RDuZTzK2mD7bO5_h5SPZKPXd49Lf3yfPV5dPwOpjcj26Gg0lguEyj4Cw3DFBCAghFHidSFCYREZqkkDzWXLKS6RRQFILLKCrL2EjNy0KjSFkuJe-Tky53aeuvFbpGzeqVXfgnlQT_Vb-0Q2k3ZGztnMVSLW31qe1GMVCtMDVTrRfVelGtMPUrTK09etyhaCuzxS7HUqQ8apPPu_Z3NcfNv2NVlt36g8eDDq9cg-stru2HihOeCPVyN1LjVyHf7jKuJvwHUVeI-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>909499099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Ross, Dan ; Reys, Robert ; Chávez, Óscar ; McNaught, Melissa D. ; Grouws, Douglas A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, Dan ; Reys, Robert ; Chávez, Óscar ; McNaught, Melissa D. ; Grouws, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><description>A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-6803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-8594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Algebra ; Cognitive Style ; Critical Thinking ; Educational Strategies ; Elementary education ; Grade 10 ; Grade 8 ; Grade 9 ; Learning ; Learning Strategies ; Longitudinal Studies ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical Applications ; Mathematical Aptitude ; Mathematical problems ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Achievement ; Mathematics education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematics Skills ; Problem Sets ; Problem Solving ; School Districts ; Secondary School Mathematics ; Secondary school students ; Student Improvement ; Students ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>School science and mathematics, 2011-12, Vol.111 (8), p.389-398</ispartof><rights>2011, School Science and Mathematics Association</rights><rights>Copyright School Science and Mathematics Association, Incorporated Dec 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ958349$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reys, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaught, Melissa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grouws, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><title>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</title><title>School science and mathematics</title><description>A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Algebra</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical Applications</subject><subject>Mathematical Aptitude</subject><subject>Mathematical problems</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Skills</subject><subject>Problem Sets</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Secondary School Mathematics</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>0036-6803</issn><issn>1949-8594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gljHCexxKZUUKjKQwQEYmM5zqSklKbYqWj_HoegrpmFH5o51_IhhDIIma_TWchkJINUyCg8A8ZCAAZRuN4hvW1jl_QAeBzEKfB9cuDcDHxxED1ykTWrAhcNzRqrG5xu6PC9rgw6Wi-opsN64Rq7Mg0W9BHd0l-RDuZTzK2mD7bO5_h5SPZKPXd49Lf3yfPV5dPwOpjcj26Gg0lguEyj4Cw3DFBCAghFHidSFCYREZqkkDzWXLKS6RRQFILLKCrL2EjNy0KjSFkuJe-Tky53aeuvFbpGzeqVXfgnlQT_Vb-0Q2k3ZGztnMVSLW31qe1GMVCtMDVTrRfVelGtMPUrTK09etyhaCuzxS7HUqQ8apPPu_Z3NcfNv2NVlt36g8eDDq9cg-stru2HihOeCPVyN1LjVyHf7jKuJvwHUVeI-Q</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Ross, Dan</creator><creator>Reys, Robert</creator><creator>Chávez, Óscar</creator><creator>McNaught, Melissa D.</creator><creator>Grouws, Douglas A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</title><author>Ross, Dan ; Reys, Robert ; Chávez, Óscar ; McNaught, Melissa D. ; Grouws, Douglas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Algebra</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical Applications</topic><topic>Mathematical Aptitude</topic><topic>Mathematical problems</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Skills</topic><topic>Problem Sets</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Secondary School Mathematics</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reys, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaught, Melissa D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grouws, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>School science and mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, Dan</au><au>Reys, Robert</au><au>Chávez, Óscar</au><au>McNaught, Melissa D.</au><au>Grouws, Douglas A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ958349</ericid><atitle>Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem</atitle><jtitle>School science and mathematics</jtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>389-398</pages><issn>0036-6803</issn><eissn>1949-8594</eissn><abstract>A central goal of secondary mathematics is for students to learn to use powerful algebraic strategies appropriately. Research has demonstrated student difficulties in the transition to using such strategies. We examined strategies used by several thousand 8th‐, 9th‐, and 10th‐grade students in five different school systems over three consecutive years on the same algebra problem. We also analyzed connections between their strategies and their success on the problem. Our findings suggest that many students continued to struggle with algebraic problems, even after several years of instruction in algebra. Students did not reflect the anticipated growth toward the consistent use of efficient strategies deemed appropriate in solving this problem. Instead a surprisingly large number of students continued to rely on strategies such as guessing and checking, or offered solutions that were unintelligible or meaningless and not useful to the researchers. Even those students who used algebraic strategies consistently did not show the anticipated improvement of performance that would be expected from several years of continuing to study mathematics.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-6803 |
ispartof | School science and mathematics, 2011-12, Vol.111 (8), p.389-398 |
issn | 0036-6803 1949-8594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_909499099 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Achievement Gains Algebra Cognitive Style Critical Thinking Educational Strategies Elementary education Grade 10 Grade 8 Grade 9 Learning Learning Strategies Longitudinal Studies Mathematical analysis Mathematical Applications Mathematical Aptitude Mathematical problems Mathematics Mathematics Achievement Mathematics education Mathematics Instruction Mathematics Skills Problem Sets Problem Solving School Districts Secondary School Mathematics Secondary school students Student Improvement Students Thinking Skills |
title | Student Strategy Choices on a Constructed Response Algebra Problem |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A39%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20Strategy%20Choices%20on%20a%20Constructed%20Response%20Algebra%20Problem&rft.jtitle=School%20science%20and%20mathematics&rft.au=Ross,%20Dan&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=389-398&rft.issn=0036-6803&rft.eissn=1949-8594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00104.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2530720001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3984-2bc10e9070e0db6795dc754ec7d936a391f1a80e5d53944ff6c9a3fdae581b993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=909499099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ958349&rfr_iscdi=true |