Loading…

Comparison of }:} and }:} With NaI(Tl) and Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) Detectors

Energy resolution and detection efficiency were compared between new scintillators, lanthanum bromide (LaBr 3 :Ce) and lanthanum chloride (LaCl 3 :Ce) with conventional detectors, sodium iodide NaI(Tl) and cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe or CZT). The study has shown that LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce sci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2008-06, Vol.55 (3), p.1174-1177
Main Authors: Alexiev, D., Mo, L., Prokopovich, D.A., Smith, M.L., Matuchova, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Energy resolution and detection efficiency were compared between new scintillators, lanthanum bromide (LaBr 3 :Ce) and lanthanum chloride (LaCl 3 :Ce) with conventional detectors, sodium iodide NaI(Tl) and cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe or CZT). The study has shown that LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce scintillator detectors provided by Saint-Gobain offer better resolution than NaI(Tl) detector. LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce detectors could resolve some closely spaced peaks from 133 Ba and 152 Eu, which Na(I) could not. LaBr 3 :Ce has slightly better resolution and higher efficiency than LaCl 3 :Ce. An overall advantage of LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce detectors over NaI(Tl) and CZT has been discussed. The intrinsic activity of LaBr 3 :Ce is also demonstrated in this study.
ISSN:0018-9499
1558-1578
DOI:10.1109/TNS.2008.922837