Loading…
Comparison of }:} and }:} With NaI(Tl) and Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) Detectors
Energy resolution and detection efficiency were compared between new scintillators, lanthanum bromide (LaBr 3 :Ce) and lanthanum chloride (LaCl 3 :Ce) with conventional detectors, sodium iodide NaI(Tl) and cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe or CZT). The study has shown that LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce sci...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2008-06, Vol.55 (3), p.1174-1177 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Energy resolution and detection efficiency were compared between new scintillators, lanthanum bromide (LaBr 3 :Ce) and lanthanum chloride (LaCl 3 :Ce) with conventional detectors, sodium iodide NaI(Tl) and cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe or CZT). The study has shown that LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce scintillator detectors provided by Saint-Gobain offer better resolution than NaI(Tl) detector. LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce detectors could resolve some closely spaced peaks from 133 Ba and 152 Eu, which Na(I) could not. LaBr 3 :Ce has slightly better resolution and higher efficiency than LaCl 3 :Ce. An overall advantage of LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce detectors over NaI(Tl) and CZT has been discussed. The intrinsic activity of LaBr 3 :Ce is also demonstrated in this study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TNS.2008.922837 |