Increasing the Reliability, Validity, and Relevance of Psychological Expert Evidence: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Expert Evidence

Discusses issues relating to the qualification of psychological expertise in the legal system including (1) the construct validity of theories and measurement techniques; (2) whether testimony is based on an acceptable application of underlying scientific knowledge; and (3) the training, knowledge,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and human behavior 1992-06, Vol.16 (3), p.253-256
Main Author: Golding, Stephen L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Expert Testimony
Forensic Psychology
Human
Legal Evidence
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-be787c08b29ac99919a3e2301f01d831849d41f2292fd0e6222517c4fc7c92843
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-be787c08b29ac99919a3e2301f01d831849d41f2292fd0e6222517c4fc7c92843
container_end_page 256
container_issue 3
container_start_page 253
container_title Law and human behavior
container_volume 16
creator Golding, Stephen L
description Discusses issues relating to the qualification of psychological expertise in the legal system including (1) the construct validity of theories and measurement techniques; (2) whether testimony is based on an acceptable application of underlying scientific knowledge; and (3) the training, knowledge, and experience of the expert witness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01044768
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_914687584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1394070</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1394070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-be787c08b29ac99919a3e2301f01d831849d41f2292fd0e6222517c4fc7c92843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbOHop7U6suPNs1Rx6aDgSJTvIUsTbeM2takG-6_N9sEEfSUB98P74UvQscYrjEAv7kbAAbGeJrtoA5OOI3TFL_tog5gxmNOge-jA-_nACAySDpoPKy0M8rbahq1MxM9m9KqiS1tu7qKXlVp882kqnwdmaWqtInqInryKz2ry3pqtSqj_mdjXBv1lzY3ARyivUKV3hx9v130MuiPew_x6PF-2LsdxYpyaOOJ4RnXkE2IUFoIgYWihlDABeA8ozhjIme4IESQIgeTEkISzDUrNNeCZIx20el2b-Pqj4XxrZzXC1eFk1JglmY82aCz_xAmIjQVPiGCutgq7WrvnSlk4-y7ciuJQa6rlT_VBnyyxXPf1u5HUsGAQ4gvt7FqlGxCUcq1VpfG64VzpmplOZtInEoqSUKDPv9b_2ZfP-6ObQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>914687584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing the Reliability, Validity, and Relevance of Psychological Expert Evidence: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Expert Evidence</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Golding, Stephen L</creator><contributor>Roesch, Ronald</contributor><creatorcontrib>Golding, Stephen L ; Roesch, Ronald</creatorcontrib><description>Discusses issues relating to the qualification of psychological expertise in the legal system including (1) the construct validity of theories and measurement techniques; (2) whether testimony is based on an acceptable application of underlying scientific knowledge; and (3) the training, knowledge, and experience of the expert witness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01044768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Plenum Publishing Corp</publisher><subject>Expert Testimony ; Forensic Psychology ; Human ; Legal Evidence</subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 1992-06, Vol.16 (3), p.253-256</ispartof><rights>1992 Plenum Publishing</rights><rights>1992 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright 1992 Plenum Publishing Corporation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-be787c08b29ac99919a3e2301f01d831849d41f2292fd0e6222517c4fc7c92843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-be787c08b29ac99919a3e2301f01d831849d41f2292fd0e6222517c4fc7c92843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Roesch, Ronald</contributor><creatorcontrib>Golding, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing the Reliability, Validity, and Relevance of Psychological Expert Evidence: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Expert Evidence</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><description>Discusses issues relating to the qualification of psychological expertise in the legal system including (1) the construct validity of theories and measurement techniques; (2) whether testimony is based on an acceptable application of underlying scientific knowledge; and (3) the training, knowledge, and experience of the expert witness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</description><subject>Expert Testimony</subject><subject>Forensic Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Legal Evidence</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxbOHop7U6suPNs1Rx6aDgSJTvIUsTbeM2takG-6_N9sEEfSUB98P74UvQscYrjEAv7kbAAbGeJrtoA5OOI3TFL_tog5gxmNOge-jA-_nACAySDpoPKy0M8rbahq1MxM9m9KqiS1tu7qKXlVp882kqnwdmaWqtInqInryKz2ry3pqtSqj_mdjXBv1lzY3ARyivUKV3hx9v130MuiPew_x6PF-2LsdxYpyaOOJ4RnXkE2IUFoIgYWihlDABeA8ozhjIme4IESQIgeTEkISzDUrNNeCZIx20el2b-Pqj4XxrZzXC1eFk1JglmY82aCz_xAmIjQVPiGCutgq7WrvnSlk4-y7ciuJQa6rlT_VBnyyxXPf1u5HUsGAQ4gvt7FqlGxCUcq1VpfG64VzpmplOZtInEoqSUKDPv9b_2ZfP-6ObQ</recordid><startdate>19920601</startdate><enddate>19920601</enddate><creator>Golding, Stephen L</creator><general>Plenum Publishing Corp</general><general>Plenum Publishing Corporation</general><general>Plenum Pub. Corp</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920601</creationdate><title>Increasing the Reliability, Validity, and Relevance of Psychological Expert Evidence</title><author>Golding, Stephen L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-be787c08b29ac99919a3e2301f01d831849d41f2292fd0e6222517c4fc7c92843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Expert Testimony</topic><topic>Forensic Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Legal Evidence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golding, Stephen L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golding, Stephen L</au><au>Roesch, Ronald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing the Reliability, Validity, and Relevance of Psychological Expert Evidence: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Expert Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><date>1992-06-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>253-256</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><abstract>Discusses issues relating to the qualification of psychological expertise in the legal system including (1) the construct validity of theories and measurement techniques; (2) whether testimony is based on an acceptable application of underlying scientific knowledge; and (3) the training, knowledge, and experience of the expert witness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Plenum Publishing Corp</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01044768</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-7307
ispartof Law and human behavior, 1992-06, Vol.16 (3), p.253-256
issn 0147-7307
1573-661X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_914687584
source PsycArticles (EBSCO); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Expert Testimony
Forensic Psychology
Human
Legal Evidence
title Increasing the Reliability, Validity, and Relevance of Psychological Expert Evidence: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Expert Evidence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20the%20Reliability,%20Validity,%20and%20Relevance%20of%20Psychological%20Expert%20Evidence:%20An%20Introduction%20to%20the%20Special%20Issue%20on%20Expert%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Golding,%20Stephen%20L&rft.date=1992-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=253-256&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01044768&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1394070%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-be787c08b29ac99919a3e2301f01d831849d41f2292fd0e6222517c4fc7c92843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=914687584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1394070&rfr_iscdi=true