A threshold citation analysis in marketing research

• Published in: European journal of marketing 2012-01, Vol.46 (1/2), p.134-156
• Main Authors: Chan, Kam C, Lai, Pikki, Liano, Kartono
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic marketing; Citation analysis; Education policy; Influence; Literature reviews; R&D; Ratings & rankings; Research & development; Researchers; Science; Social psychology; Strategic management; Studies
• ISSN: 0309-0566; 1758-7123
• DOI: 10.1108/03090561211189211

Purpose - The objective of this paper is to simultaneously identify influential articles, journals, institutions, and researchers in marketing research in recent years using a threshold citation analysis.Design methodology approach - The threshold citation analysis counts the number of times a research work is cited by articles published in a set of elite marketing journals. In order to be included in the analysis, the research work must be cited 18 or more times. This threshold is used to measure influence and is unique in the ranking of marketing research. The threshold citation analysis incorporates the quality, the importance, and the influence of research works in the ranking criteria and is not limited to a set of journals nor confined by the year a research work is published.Findings - The three frequently cited articles in marketing research are Fornell and Larcker, Baron and Kenny, and Anderson and Gerbing. Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, and Journal of Consumer Research are the three marketing journals having the greatest influence in marketing research. As for the ranking of institutions, the three most influential institutions in marketing research are Northwestern University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Michigan while the three frequently cited authors in marketing research are Richard Oliver, Valarie Zeithaml, and James Anderson.Originality value - First, this study identifies influential research works, journals, institutions, and researchers in marketing simultaneously and is in sharp contrast to the traditional approaches that identify influential research works, journals, institutions, and researchers separately. Second, this analysis mitigates the limitations that have plagued the quantity oriented publication-based approach and the quality oriented citation-based approach, making these findings more robust and inclusive. Finally, this paper identifies non-marketing journals, non-marketing articles, and scholarly books that have significant impact on contemporary marketing research. Consequently, this study offers new and comprehensive insights to the rankings research in marketing that were neglected by previous studies.