Salvage C2 Ganglionectomy After C2 Nerve Root Decompression Provides Similar Pain Relief as a Single Surgical Procedure for Intractable Occipital Neuralgia

• Published in: World neurosurgery 2012-02, Vol.77 (2), p.362-369
• Main Authors: Pisapia, Jared M, Bhowmick, Deb A, Farber, Roger E, Zager, Eric L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Cervicogenic headache; Decompression, Surgical - methods; Disability Evaluation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Ganglia, Spinal - surgery; Ganglionectomy; Ganglionectomy - methods; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nerve root decompression; Neuralgia - etiology; Neuralgia - surgery; Neurosurgery; Occipital neuralgia; Pain Management - methods; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative - therapy; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Radiculopathy - surgery; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1878-8750; 1878-8769
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.062

Objective To determine the effectiveness of C2 nerve root decompression and C2 dorsal root ganglionectomy for intractable occipital neuralgia (ON) and C2 ganglionectomy after pain recurrence following initial decompression. Methods A retrospective review was performed of the medical records of patients undergoing surgery for ON. Pain relief at the time of the most recent follow-up was rated as excellent (headache relieved), good (headache improved), or poor (headache unchanged or worse). Telephone contact supplemented chart review, and patients rated their preoperative and postoperative pain on a 10-point numeric scale. Patient satisfaction and disability were also examined. Results Of 43 patients, 29 were available for follow-up after C2 nerve root decompression (n = 11), C2 dorsal root ganglionectomy (n = 10), or decompression followed by ganglionectomy (n = 8). Overall, 19 of 29 patients (66%) experienced a good or excellent outcome at most recent follow-up. Among the 19 patients who completed the telephone questionnaire (mean follow-up 5.6 years), patients undergoing decompression, ganglionectomy, or decompression followed by ganglionectomy experienced similar outcomes, with mean pain reduction ratings of 5 ± 4.0, 4.5 ± 4.1, and 5.7 ± 3.5. Of 19 telephone responders, 13 (68%) rated overall operative results as very good or satisfactory. Conclusions In the third largest series of surgical intervention for ON, most patients experienced favorable postoperative pain relief. For patients with pain recurrence after C2 decompression, salvage C2 ganglionectomy is a viable surgical option and should be offered with the potential for complete pain relief and improved quality of life (QOL).