Loading…
Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment
Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simult...
Saved in:
Published in: | Autoimmunity reviews 2012-05, Vol.11 (6), p.A544-A554 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33 |
container_end_page | A554 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | A544 |
container_title | Autoimmunity reviews |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Borchers, Andrea T Gershwin, M. Eric |
description | Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011210942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1568997212000080</els_id><sourcerecordid>1011210942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkT9PwzAQxSMEElD4BgweGdrgP0maMCBVCApSJQZgNhfnXFzSONguqN8eR2Fg5RafrPee7n6XJBeMpoyy4mqTwi44_Eo5ZTylLKVUHCQnLC_KWVXN-eGf_jg59X5Do63i1UnytjTQBaKwbQm4gM4E46_JgsQ4g9_EaqJa8N5ooyAY201JD-Hd9u97b2xr1_spWaPF3jS4HT8IdA2J40DYYhfOkiMNrcfz33eSvN7fvdw-zFZPy8fbxWqmcpaH2TzTuoC8FLmqG4UCeM3KUmvgLAfEvJ7zTHAomrIsGqGrOkMQrCgo1ljXjRCT5HLM7Z393KEPcmv8sBZ0aHdeRlCMM1plPEqzUaqc9d6hlr0zW3D7KBp0hdzIEagcgErKZAQabTejDeMaEY6TXhnsFDbGoQqysea_Aao1XeTafuAe_cbuXBcRSSZ99Mjn4WbDyRinsUoqfgDOY5gy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011210942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Borchers, Andrea T ; Gershwin, M. Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Borchers, Andrea T ; Gershwin, M. Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-9972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-9972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Allergy and Immunology ; Aneurysm ; Aorta ; Arteries ; Arteritis ; Biopsy ; Color ; Doppler effect ; Epidemiology ; Giant cells ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Positron emission tomography ; Reviews ; Sex differences ; Skull ; Ultrasonography ; Vasculitis</subject><ispartof>Autoimmunity reviews, 2012-05, Vol.11 (6), p.A544-A554</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borchers, Andrea T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershwin, M. Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</title><title>Autoimmunity reviews</title><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences.</description><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Aneurysm</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Arteries</subject><subject>Arteritis</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Giant cells</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Vasculitis</subject><issn>1568-9972</issn><issn>1568-9972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkT9PwzAQxSMEElD4BgweGdrgP0maMCBVCApSJQZgNhfnXFzSONguqN8eR2Fg5RafrPee7n6XJBeMpoyy4mqTwi44_Eo5ZTylLKVUHCQnLC_KWVXN-eGf_jg59X5Do63i1UnytjTQBaKwbQm4gM4E46_JgsQ4g9_EaqJa8N5ooyAY201JD-Hd9u97b2xr1_spWaPF3jS4HT8IdA2J40DYYhfOkiMNrcfz33eSvN7fvdw-zFZPy8fbxWqmcpaH2TzTuoC8FLmqG4UCeM3KUmvgLAfEvJ7zTHAomrIsGqGrOkMQrCgo1ljXjRCT5HLM7Z393KEPcmv8sBZ0aHdeRlCMM1plPEqzUaqc9d6hlr0zW3D7KBp0hdzIEagcgErKZAQabTejDeMaEY6TXhnsFDbGoQqysea_Aao1XeTafuAe_cbuXBcRSSZ99Mjn4WbDyRinsUoqfgDOY5gy</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Borchers, Andrea T</creator><creator>Gershwin, M. Eric</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</title><author>Borchers, Andrea T ; Gershwin, M. Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Aneurysm</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Arteries</topic><topic>Arteritis</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Giant cells</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Vasculitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borchers, Andrea T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershwin, M. Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Autoimmunity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borchers, Andrea T</au><au>Gershwin, M. Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</atitle><jtitle>Autoimmunity reviews</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>A544</spage><epage>A554</epage><pages>A544-A554</pages><issn>1568-9972</issn><eissn>1568-9972</eissn><abstract>Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1568-9972 |
ispartof | Autoimmunity reviews, 2012-05, Vol.11 (6), p.A544-A554 |
issn | 1568-9972 1568-9972 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011210942 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Allergy and Immunology Aneurysm Aorta Arteries Arteritis Biopsy Color Doppler effect Epidemiology Giant cells Magnetic resonance imaging Positron emission tomography Reviews Sex differences Skull Ultrasonography Vasculitis |
title | Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A00%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Giant%20cell%20arteritis:%20A%20review%20of%20classification,%20pathophysiology,%20geoepidemiology%20and%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Autoimmunity%20reviews&rft.au=Borchers,%20Andrea%20T&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=A544&rft.epage=A554&rft.pages=A544-A554&rft.issn=1568-9972&rft.eissn=1568-9972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1011210942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011210942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |