Loading…

Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment

Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Autoimmunity reviews 2012-05, Vol.11 (6), p.A544-A554
Main Authors: Borchers, Andrea T, Gershwin, M. Eric
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33
container_end_page A554
container_issue 6
container_start_page A544
container_title Autoimmunity reviews
container_volume 11
creator Borchers, Andrea T
Gershwin, M. Eric
description Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011210942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1568997212000080</els_id><sourcerecordid>1011210942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkT9PwzAQxSMEElD4BgweGdrgP0maMCBVCApSJQZgNhfnXFzSONguqN8eR2Fg5RafrPee7n6XJBeMpoyy4mqTwi44_Eo5ZTylLKVUHCQnLC_KWVXN-eGf_jg59X5Do63i1UnytjTQBaKwbQm4gM4E46_JgsQ4g9_EaqJa8N5ooyAY201JD-Hd9u97b2xr1_spWaPF3jS4HT8IdA2J40DYYhfOkiMNrcfz33eSvN7fvdw-zFZPy8fbxWqmcpaH2TzTuoC8FLmqG4UCeM3KUmvgLAfEvJ7zTHAomrIsGqGrOkMQrCgo1ljXjRCT5HLM7Z393KEPcmv8sBZ0aHdeRlCMM1plPEqzUaqc9d6hlr0zW3D7KBp0hdzIEagcgErKZAQabTejDeMaEY6TXhnsFDbGoQqysea_Aao1XeTafuAe_cbuXBcRSSZ99Mjn4WbDyRinsUoqfgDOY5gy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011210942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Borchers, Andrea T ; Gershwin, M. Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Borchers, Andrea T ; Gershwin, M. Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-9972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-9972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Allergy and Immunology ; Aneurysm ; Aorta ; Arteries ; Arteritis ; Biopsy ; Color ; Doppler effect ; Epidemiology ; Giant cells ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Positron emission tomography ; Reviews ; Sex differences ; Skull ; Ultrasonography ; Vasculitis</subject><ispartof>Autoimmunity reviews, 2012-05, Vol.11 (6), p.A544-A554</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borchers, Andrea T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershwin, M. Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</title><title>Autoimmunity reviews</title><description>Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences.</description><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Aneurysm</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Arteries</subject><subject>Arteritis</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Giant cells</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Vasculitis</subject><issn>1568-9972</issn><issn>1568-9972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkT9PwzAQxSMEElD4BgweGdrgP0maMCBVCApSJQZgNhfnXFzSONguqN8eR2Fg5RafrPee7n6XJBeMpoyy4mqTwi44_Eo5ZTylLKVUHCQnLC_KWVXN-eGf_jg59X5Do63i1UnytjTQBaKwbQm4gM4E46_JgsQ4g9_EaqJa8N5ooyAY201JD-Hd9u97b2xr1_spWaPF3jS4HT8IdA2J40DYYhfOkiMNrcfz33eSvN7fvdw-zFZPy8fbxWqmcpaH2TzTuoC8FLmqG4UCeM3KUmvgLAfEvJ7zTHAomrIsGqGrOkMQrCgo1ljXjRCT5HLM7Z393KEPcmv8sBZ0aHdeRlCMM1plPEqzUaqc9d6hlr0zW3D7KBp0hdzIEagcgErKZAQabTejDeMaEY6TXhnsFDbGoQqysea_Aao1XeTafuAe_cbuXBcRSSZ99Mjn4WbDyRinsUoqfgDOY5gy</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Borchers, Andrea T</creator><creator>Gershwin, M. Eric</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</title><author>Borchers, Andrea T ; Gershwin, M. Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Aneurysm</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Arteries</topic><topic>Arteritis</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Giant cells</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Vasculitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borchers, Andrea T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershwin, M. Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Autoimmunity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borchers, Andrea T</au><au>Gershwin, M. Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment</atitle><jtitle>Autoimmunity reviews</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>A544</spage><epage>A554</epage><pages>A544-A554</pages><issn>1568-9972</issn><eissn>1568-9972</eissn><abstract>Abstract Giant cell arteritis is a chronic vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized arteries, most commonly the temporal and other cranial arteries. Temporal artery biopsy has long been the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. There is growing evidence that simultaneous color Doppler and duplex ultrasonography of temporal arteries of GCA patients represents a valid alternative for this somewhat invasive procedure. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography have also provided evidence that involvement of the aorta and its proximal branches is much more common in giant cell arteritis than previously appreciated; it will be important to clarify whether these patients need to be treated more aggressively. It has long been known that patients with giant cell arteritis face a markedly increased risk of developing aortic aneurysms and of dying from aortic dissection. This raises important questions as to whether patients should be screened regularly for extra-cranial large-vessel involvement and whether and how treatment of patients with positive screening results should be adjusted. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of this disease and also the issues of epidemiology and sex differences.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1568-9972
ispartof Autoimmunity reviews, 2012-05, Vol.11 (6), p.A544-A554
issn 1568-9972
1568-9972
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1011210942
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Allergy and Immunology
Aneurysm
Aorta
Arteries
Arteritis
Biopsy
Color
Doppler effect
Epidemiology
Giant cells
Magnetic resonance imaging
Positron emission tomography
Reviews
Sex differences
Skull
Ultrasonography
Vasculitis
title Giant cell arteritis: A review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A00%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Giant%20cell%20arteritis:%20A%20review%20of%20classification,%20pathophysiology,%20geoepidemiology%20and%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Autoimmunity%20reviews&rft.au=Borchers,%20Andrea%20T&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=A544&rft.epage=A554&rft.pages=A544-A554&rft.issn=1568-9972&rft.eissn=1568-9972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1011210942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-74ff6a5835cbdce3a2b188ffa215aee5b72432a6d886d3f9b4ea31660ebebbd33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011210942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true