Loading…
A simplified Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology using only four categories improves intra- and inter-observer diagnostic agreement and provides non-overlapping estimates of malignancy risks
Our previous study utilizing the 2008 NCI six‐category system (also known as The Bethesda System) for reporting thyroid fine‐needle aspirations (FNA) identified considerable overlap in diagnosis and in assigned malignancy risk estimates for the “follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)”...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diagnostic cytopathology 2012-05, Vol.40 (S1), p.E62-E68 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4257-26186dd6c5926c7ae8efd0099cace80817300ce3422d646b6dcf9e4ccf1000ed3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4257-26186dd6c5926c7ae8efd0099cace80817300ce3422d646b6dcf9e4ccf1000ed3 |
container_end_page | E68 |
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | E62 |
container_title | Diagnostic cytopathology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Walts, Ann E. Bose, Shikha Fan, Xuemo Frishberg, David Scharre, Karen de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza Zhai, Jing Marchevsky, Alberto M. |
description | Our previous study utilizing the 2008 NCI six‐category system (also known as The Bethesda System) for reporting thyroid fine‐needle aspirations (FNA) identified considerable overlap in diagnosis and in assigned malignancy risk estimates for the “follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)” and “follicular neoplasm (FN)” categories and for the “suspicious for malignancy (Susp)” and “malignant” categories. We proposed a simplified Bethesda System for reporting thyroid FNAs that provided four non‐overlapping, statistically significant, and more clinically relevant diagnostic categories: unsatisfactory, benign, FLUS/FN, and Susp/malignant. In the current study, six cytopathologists participated in a blinded retrospective review of 60 thyroid FNAs and kappa statistics were utilized to compare the intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreements obtained using the six‐category and the simplified four‐category schemes. Surgical follow‐up was used to determine which scheme provided more discrete malignancy risk estimates. Use of the simplified four‐category scheme significantly improved intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreement levels, significantly increased the sensitivity of FNA for a diagnosis of carcinoma in the subsequently resected thyroid glands, and provided non‐overlapping malignancy risk estimates for each diagnostic category. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2012;40:E62–E68. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/dc.21697 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1016672002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1016672002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4257-26186dd6c5926c7ae8efd0099cace80817300ce3422d646b6dcf9e4ccf1000ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9y1SAUhxlHx16rMz6Bw9INFfIHkmW9arVT60btkuHCSS42gQikmpf0mSTtbV254szwnY_D-SH0ktETRmnxxuiTgvFWPEIbRltBaFm2j9GmEXVNGC3bI_Qsxh-U0jZjT9FRwepa1GW1QX9OcbTjNNjOgsFvIe0hGoXjEhOMuPMBB5h8SNb1OO2X4K3Bekl-UmnvB98veI7rnXfDkvE5YK0S9D5YiDiLg79ZC5eCIlg5s5YQiN9FCDcQsLGqdz4mq7HqA8AILt1ya6c1udd5R7IkDGqa1pcgw2N-I2Lf4VENtnfK6QUHG6_jc_SkU0OEF4fzGH378P7r9iO5-HL2aXt6QXRV1IIUnDXcGK7rtuBaKGigM3k7rVYaGtowUVKqoayKwvCK77jRXQuV1l1eNwVTHqPXd9485s85jyRHGzUMg3Lg5ygZZZyLImfzD9XBxxigk1PIHwhLhuSanjRa3qaX0VcH67wbwTyA93FlgNwBv-wAy39F8t32XnjgbY7z9wOvwrXkohS1vLo8k5-vvgt2ec7lefkXa7e5CA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1016672002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A simplified Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology using only four categories improves intra- and inter-observer diagnostic agreement and provides non-overlapping estimates of malignancy risks</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Walts, Ann E. ; Bose, Shikha ; Fan, Xuemo ; Frishberg, David ; Scharre, Karen ; de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza ; Zhai, Jing ; Marchevsky, Alberto M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walts, Ann E. ; Bose, Shikha ; Fan, Xuemo ; Frishberg, David ; Scharre, Karen ; de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza ; Zhai, Jing ; Marchevsky, Alberto M.</creatorcontrib><description>Our previous study utilizing the 2008 NCI six‐category system (also known as The Bethesda System) for reporting thyroid fine‐needle aspirations (FNA) identified considerable overlap in diagnosis and in assigned malignancy risk estimates for the “follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)” and “follicular neoplasm (FN)” categories and for the “suspicious for malignancy (Susp)” and “malignant” categories. We proposed a simplified Bethesda System for reporting thyroid FNAs that provided four non‐overlapping, statistically significant, and more clinically relevant diagnostic categories: unsatisfactory, benign, FLUS/FN, and Susp/malignant. In the current study, six cytopathologists participated in a blinded retrospective review of 60 thyroid FNAs and kappa statistics were utilized to compare the intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreements obtained using the six‐category and the simplified four‐category schemes. Surgical follow‐up was used to determine which scheme provided more discrete malignancy risk estimates. Use of the simplified four‐category scheme significantly improved intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreement levels, significantly increased the sensitivity of FNA for a diagnosis of carcinoma in the subsequently resected thyroid glands, and provided non‐overlapping malignancy risk estimates for each diagnostic category. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2012;40:E62–E68. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-1039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dc.21697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21557534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Bethesda ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards ; diagnostic agreement ; False Positive Reactions ; FNA ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; kappa value ; National Cancer Institute (U.S.) ; Observer Variation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; thyroid ; Thyroid Gland - pathology ; Thyroid Gland - surgery ; Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology ; Thyroidectomy ; United States</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic cytopathology, 2012-05, Vol.40 (S1), p.E62-E68</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4257-26186dd6c5926c7ae8efd0099cace80817300ce3422d646b6dcf9e4ccf1000ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4257-26186dd6c5926c7ae8efd0099cace80817300ce3422d646b6dcf9e4ccf1000ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21557534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walts, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bose, Shikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xuemo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frishberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharre, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchevsky, Alberto M.</creatorcontrib><title>A simplified Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology using only four categories improves intra- and inter-observer diagnostic agreement and provides non-overlapping estimates of malignancy risks</title><title>Diagnostic cytopathology</title><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><description>Our previous study utilizing the 2008 NCI six‐category system (also known as The Bethesda System) for reporting thyroid fine‐needle aspirations (FNA) identified considerable overlap in diagnosis and in assigned malignancy risk estimates for the “follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)” and “follicular neoplasm (FN)” categories and for the “suspicious for malignancy (Susp)” and “malignant” categories. We proposed a simplified Bethesda System for reporting thyroid FNAs that provided four non‐overlapping, statistically significant, and more clinically relevant diagnostic categories: unsatisfactory, benign, FLUS/FN, and Susp/malignant. In the current study, six cytopathologists participated in a blinded retrospective review of 60 thyroid FNAs and kappa statistics were utilized to compare the intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreements obtained using the six‐category and the simplified four‐category schemes. Surgical follow‐up was used to determine which scheme provided more discrete malignancy risk estimates. Use of the simplified four‐category scheme significantly improved intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreement levels, significantly increased the sensitivity of FNA for a diagnosis of carcinoma in the subsequently resected thyroid glands, and provided non‐overlapping malignancy risk estimates for each diagnostic category. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2012;40:E62–E68. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Bethesda</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards</subject><subject>diagnostic agreement</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>FNA</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>kappa value</subject><subject>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>thyroid</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - pathology</subject><subject>Thyroid Gland - surgery</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Thyroidectomy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>8755-1039</issn><issn>1097-0339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9y1SAUhxlHx16rMz6Bw9INFfIHkmW9arVT60btkuHCSS42gQikmpf0mSTtbV254szwnY_D-SH0ktETRmnxxuiTgvFWPEIbRltBaFm2j9GmEXVNGC3bI_Qsxh-U0jZjT9FRwepa1GW1QX9OcbTjNNjOgsFvIe0hGoXjEhOMuPMBB5h8SNb1OO2X4K3Bekl-UmnvB98veI7rnXfDkvE5YK0S9D5YiDiLg79ZC5eCIlg5s5YQiN9FCDcQsLGqdz4mq7HqA8AILt1ya6c1udd5R7IkDGqa1pcgw2N-I2Lf4VENtnfK6QUHG6_jc_SkU0OEF4fzGH378P7r9iO5-HL2aXt6QXRV1IIUnDXcGK7rtuBaKGigM3k7rVYaGtowUVKqoayKwvCK77jRXQuV1l1eNwVTHqPXd9485s85jyRHGzUMg3Lg5ygZZZyLImfzD9XBxxigk1PIHwhLhuSanjRa3qaX0VcH67wbwTyA93FlgNwBv-wAy39F8t32XnjgbY7z9wOvwrXkohS1vLo8k5-vvgt2ec7lefkXa7e5CA</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Walts, Ann E.</creator><creator>Bose, Shikha</creator><creator>Fan, Xuemo</creator><creator>Frishberg, David</creator><creator>Scharre, Karen</creator><creator>de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza</creator><creator>Zhai, Jing</creator><creator>Marchevsky, Alberto M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>A simplified Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology using only four categories improves intra- and inter-observer diagnostic agreement and provides non-overlapping estimates of malignancy risks</title><author>Walts, Ann E. ; Bose, Shikha ; Fan, Xuemo ; Frishberg, David ; Scharre, Karen ; de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza ; Zhai, Jing ; Marchevsky, Alberto M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4257-26186dd6c5926c7ae8efd0099cace80817300ce3422d646b6dcf9e4ccf1000ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bethesda</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards</topic><topic>diagnostic agreement</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>FNA</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>kappa value</topic><topic>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>thyroid</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - pathology</topic><topic>Thyroid Gland - surgery</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Thyroidectomy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walts, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bose, Shikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xuemo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frishberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharre, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchevsky, Alberto M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walts, Ann E.</au><au>Bose, Shikha</au><au>Fan, Xuemo</au><au>Frishberg, David</au><au>Scharre, Karen</au><au>de Peralta-Venturina, Mariza</au><au>Zhai, Jing</au><au>Marchevsky, Alberto M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A simplified Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology using only four categories improves intra- and inter-observer diagnostic agreement and provides non-overlapping estimates of malignancy risks</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>E62</spage><epage>E68</epage><pages>E62-E68</pages><issn>8755-1039</issn><eissn>1097-0339</eissn><abstract>Our previous study utilizing the 2008 NCI six‐category system (also known as The Bethesda System) for reporting thyroid fine‐needle aspirations (FNA) identified considerable overlap in diagnosis and in assigned malignancy risk estimates for the “follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS)” and “follicular neoplasm (FN)” categories and for the “suspicious for malignancy (Susp)” and “malignant” categories. We proposed a simplified Bethesda System for reporting thyroid FNAs that provided four non‐overlapping, statistically significant, and more clinically relevant diagnostic categories: unsatisfactory, benign, FLUS/FN, and Susp/malignant. In the current study, six cytopathologists participated in a blinded retrospective review of 60 thyroid FNAs and kappa statistics were utilized to compare the intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreements obtained using the six‐category and the simplified four‐category schemes. Surgical follow‐up was used to determine which scheme provided more discrete malignancy risk estimates. Use of the simplified four‐category scheme significantly improved intra‐ and inter‐observer diagnostic agreement levels, significantly increased the sensitivity of FNA for a diagnosis of carcinoma in the subsequently resected thyroid glands, and provided non‐overlapping malignancy risk estimates for each diagnostic category. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2012;40:E62–E68. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21557534</pmid><doi>10.1002/dc.21697</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-1039 |
ispartof | Diagnostic cytopathology, 2012-05, Vol.40 (S1), p.E62-E68 |
issn | 8755-1039 1097-0339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1016672002 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Bethesda Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards diagnostic agreement False Positive Reactions FNA Follow-Up Studies Humans kappa value National Cancer Institute (U.S.) Observer Variation Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Sensitivity and Specificity thyroid Thyroid Gland - pathology Thyroid Gland - surgery Thyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis Thyroid Neoplasms - pathology Thyroidectomy United States |
title | A simplified Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology using only four categories improves intra- and inter-observer diagnostic agreement and provides non-overlapping estimates of malignancy risks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20simplified%20Bethesda%20system%20for%20reporting%20thyroid%20cytopathology%20using%20only%20four%20categories%20improves%20intra-%20and%20inter-observer%20diagnostic%20agreement%20and%20provides%20non-overlapping%20estimates%20of%20malignancy%20risks&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20cytopathology&rft.au=Walts,%20Ann%20E.&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=E62&rft.epage=E68&rft.pages=E62-E68&rft.issn=8755-1039&rft.eissn=1097-0339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dc.21697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1016672002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4257-26186dd6c5926c7ae8efd0099cace80817300ce3422d646b6dcf9e4ccf1000ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1016672002&rft_id=info:pmid/21557534&rfr_iscdi=true |