The Coevolution of Network Ties and Perceptions of Team Psychological Safety

Which comes first—team social networks or emergent team states (e.g., team climate)? We argue that team members' social network ties and team members' climate perceptions coevolve over time as a function of six reciprocal and co-occurring processes. We test our conceptual framework in a 10...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organization science (Providence, R.I.) R.I.), 2012-03, Vol.23 (2), p.564-581
Main Authors: Schulte, Mathis, Cohen, N. Andrew, Klein, Katherine J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Affect (Psychology)
Analysis
Coevolution
Cognitive psychology
Conceptualization
Friendship
Group dynamics
group processes and performance
group structure
Hypotheses
Interorganizational relations
longitudinal research design
Longitudinal studies
network analysis
Organizational behaviour
Organizational culture
Perception
Perceptions
Perceptual organization
psychological processes
Psychological safety
Psychology
Safety
School environment
Sense making
Sensory perception
Social networking
Social networks
Social perception
Social psychology
Social structure
Sociology
Special Issue on the Genesis and Dynamics of Networks
Studies
Teams
Teamwork
Work groups
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Which comes first—team social networks or emergent team states (e.g., team climate)? We argue that team members' social network ties and team members' climate perceptions coevolve over time as a function of six reciprocal and co-occurring processes. We test our conceptual framework in a 10-month longitudinal study of perceptions of team psychological safety and social network ties in 69 work teams and find considerable support for our hypotheses. Our main results suggest that perceptions of psychological safety predict network ties. The more psychologically safe team members perceive their team to be, the more likely they are to ask their teammates for advice and to see them as friends, and the less likely they are to report difficult relationships with them. At the same time, network ties predict psychological safety. Team members adopt their friends' and advisors' perceptions of the team's psychological safety and reject the perceptions of those with whom they report a difficult relationship. Our framework and findings suggest that conceptual models and tests of unidirectional or team-level effects are likely to substantially misrepresent the mechanisms by which network ties and emergent team states coevolve.
ISSN:1047-7039
1526-5455
DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0582