Surfactant and irrigation effects on wettable soils: runoff, erosion, and water retention responses

• Published in: Hydrological processes 2011-02, Vol.25 (5), p.766-777
• Main Authors: Lehrsch, G.A, Sojka, R.E, Reed, J.L, Henderson, R.A, Kostka, S.J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: alkyl polyglycoside; available water; available water capacity; block copolymers; composite polymers; Contact angle; Erosion; hydrological response; Infiltration; infiltration (hydrology); Irrigation; overland flow; Runoff; Sand; sandy soils; sediment loss; sediment yield; silt loam soils; soil erosion; soil loss; soil matric potential; soil water content; soil water relations; Soils; splash erosion; Surfactants; water content; water potential; water repellent soil; water repellent soils; wettable soils
• ISSN: 0885-6087; 1099-1085; 1099-1085
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7866

Surfactants are chemical compounds that can change the contact angle of a water drop on solid surfaces and are commonly used to increase infiltration into water repellent soil. Since production fields with water repellent soil often contain areas of wettable soil, surfactants applied to such fields worldwide will likely be applied to wettable soil, with unknown consequences for irrigation-induced erosion, runoff, or soil water relations. We evaluated surfactant and simulated sprinkler irrigation effects on these responses for three wettable, Pacific Northwest soils, Latahco and Rad silt loams, and Quincy sand. Along with an untreated control, we studied three surfactants: an alkyl polyglycoside (APG) in solution at a concentration of 18 g active ingredient (AI) kg⁻¹, a block copolymer at 26 g kg⁻¹, and a blend of the two at 43 g kg⁻¹. From 2005 to 2009 in the laboratory, each surfactant was sprayed at a rate of 46·8 l ha⁻¹ onto each soil packed by tamping into 1·2- by 1·5-m steel boxes. Thereafter, each treated soil was irrigated twice at 88 mm h⁻¹ with surfactant-free well water. After each irrigation, runoff and sediment loss were measured and soil samples were collected. While measured properties differed among soils and irrigations, surfactants had no effect on runoff, sediment loss, splash loss, or tension infiltration, compared to the control. Across all soils, however, the APG increased volumetric water contents by about 3% (significant at p≤0·08) at matric potentials from 0 to − 20 kPa compared to the control. With a decrease in the liquid-solid contact angle on treated soil surfaces, surfactant-free water appeared able to enter, and be retained in pores with diameters ≥ 15 µm. All told, surfactants applied at economic rates to these wettable Pacific Northwest soils posed little risk of increasing either runoff or erosion or harming soil water relations. Moreover, by increasing water retention at high potentials, surfactants applied to wettable soils may allow water containing pesticides or other agricultural chemicals to better penetrate soil pores, thereby increasing the efficacy of the co-applied materials. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.