Loading…
In search of the best pollinators for canola (Brassica napus L.) production in Pakistan
To discover the pollinator community of canola ( Brassica napus L.) and the best pollinators for canola production, an experiment was performed at the research farm of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. The insect pollinator community was composed of 35 species in 3 orders and 14 famil...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied entomology and zoology 2011-08, Vol.46 (3), p.353-361 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-2ba6cb7351463b82199df3b3c2e6bb5a8bf15bf4d34eec9405c2a5acacd2ae423 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-2ba6cb7351463b82199df3b3c2e6bb5a8bf15bf4d34eec9405c2a5acacd2ae423 |
container_end_page | 361 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 353 |
container_title | Applied entomology and zoology |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Ali, Mudssar Saeed, Shafqat Sajjad, Asif Whittington, Andrew |
description | To discover the pollinator community of canola (
Brassica napus
L.) and the best pollinators for canola production, an experiment was performed at the research farm of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. The insect pollinator community was composed of 35 species in 3 orders and 14 families. Most of the bees (Hymenoptera) and a butterfly species (Lepidoptera) foraged for nectar, whereas all the flies (Diptera) foraged either for pollen or both nectar and pollen. Eight major pollinators were tested for their pollination efficiency. The nectar-robbing behavior of many species made it difficult to judge the efficiency of an insect on the basis of visitation rate and stay time; therefore, the amounts of pollen deposited and pollen harvested per visit were also measured. The single visit efficiency in terms of the number of seeds per pod revealed that
Apis dorsata
,
A. florea
, and
Halictus
sp. were superior for canola pollination, having Spears’ values of 1.62, 1.55 and 1.73, respectively. With the increase in the number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod also increased, confirming the importance of these three pollinator species in canola production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13355-011-0051-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017972647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017972647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-2ba6cb7351463b82199df3b3c2e6bb5a8bf15bf4d34eec9405c2a5acacd2ae423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9g8liHFn0kzQsWXVAkGEGzW2XVoSmoHXzLw73FVZpa75XlP7z2EXHI254xV18il1LpgnBeM6TyOyIRLVRUl0x_HZMIYk0W5KMUpOUPcMiZUvVAT8v4UKHpIbkNjQ4eNp9bjQPvYdW2AISakTUzUQYgd0NltAsTWAQ3Qj0hX8yvap7ge3dDGQNtAX-CrxQHCOTlpoEN_8ben5O3-7nX5WKyeH56WN6vC5XJDISyUzlZSc1VKuxC8rteNtNIJX1qrYWEbrm2j1lJ572rFtBOgwYFbC_BKyCmZHe7mGt9jrm52LTrfdRB8HNFwxqu6EqWqMsoPqEsRMfnG9KndQfrJkNlLNAeJJks0e4mG5Yw4ZDCz4dMns41jCvmjf0K_jk90zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017972647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In search of the best pollinators for canola (Brassica napus L.) production in Pakistan</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Ali, Mudssar ; Saeed, Shafqat ; Sajjad, Asif ; Whittington, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mudssar ; Saeed, Shafqat ; Sajjad, Asif ; Whittington, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>To discover the pollinator community of canola (
Brassica napus
L.) and the best pollinators for canola production, an experiment was performed at the research farm of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. The insect pollinator community was composed of 35 species in 3 orders and 14 families. Most of the bees (Hymenoptera) and a butterfly species (Lepidoptera) foraged for nectar, whereas all the flies (Diptera) foraged either for pollen or both nectar and pollen. Eight major pollinators were tested for their pollination efficiency. The nectar-robbing behavior of many species made it difficult to judge the efficiency of an insect on the basis of visitation rate and stay time; therefore, the amounts of pollen deposited and pollen harvested per visit were also measured. The single visit efficiency in terms of the number of seeds per pod revealed that
Apis dorsata
,
A. florea
, and
Halictus
sp. were superior for canola pollination, having Spears’ values of 1.62, 1.55 and 1.73, respectively. With the increase in the number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod also increased, confirming the importance of these three pollinator species in canola production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-605X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13355-011-0051-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Apis dorsata ; Applied Ecology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brassica napus ; Diptera ; Entomology ; Environmental Management ; Halictus ; Hymenoptera ; Lepidoptera ; Life Sciences ; Original Research Paper ; Plant Pathology ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Applied entomology and zoology, 2011-08, Vol.46 (3), p.353-361</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society of Applied Entomology and Zoology 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-2ba6cb7351463b82199df3b3c2e6bb5a8bf15bf4d34eec9405c2a5acacd2ae423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-2ba6cb7351463b82199df3b3c2e6bb5a8bf15bf4d34eec9405c2a5acacd2ae423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mudssar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Shafqat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajjad, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>In search of the best pollinators for canola (Brassica napus L.) production in Pakistan</title><title>Applied entomology and zoology</title><addtitle>Appl Entomol Zool</addtitle><description>To discover the pollinator community of canola (
Brassica napus
L.) and the best pollinators for canola production, an experiment was performed at the research farm of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. The insect pollinator community was composed of 35 species in 3 orders and 14 families. Most of the bees (Hymenoptera) and a butterfly species (Lepidoptera) foraged for nectar, whereas all the flies (Diptera) foraged either for pollen or both nectar and pollen. Eight major pollinators were tested for their pollination efficiency. The nectar-robbing behavior of many species made it difficult to judge the efficiency of an insect on the basis of visitation rate and stay time; therefore, the amounts of pollen deposited and pollen harvested per visit were also measured. The single visit efficiency in terms of the number of seeds per pod revealed that
Apis dorsata
,
A. florea
, and
Halictus
sp. were superior for canola pollination, having Spears’ values of 1.62, 1.55 and 1.73, respectively. With the increase in the number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod also increased, confirming the importance of these three pollinator species in canola production.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Apis dorsata</subject><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Halictus</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Research Paper</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0003-6862</issn><issn>1347-605X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9g8liHFn0kzQsWXVAkGEGzW2XVoSmoHXzLw73FVZpa75XlP7z2EXHI254xV18il1LpgnBeM6TyOyIRLVRUl0x_HZMIYk0W5KMUpOUPcMiZUvVAT8v4UKHpIbkNjQ4eNp9bjQPvYdW2AISakTUzUQYgd0NltAsTWAQ3Qj0hX8yvap7ge3dDGQNtAX-CrxQHCOTlpoEN_8ben5O3-7nX5WKyeH56WN6vC5XJDISyUzlZSc1VKuxC8rteNtNIJX1qrYWEbrm2j1lJ572rFtBOgwYFbC_BKyCmZHe7mGt9jrm52LTrfdRB8HNFwxqu6EqWqMsoPqEsRMfnG9KndQfrJkNlLNAeJJks0e4mG5Yw4ZDCz4dMns41jCvmjf0K_jk90zQ</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Ali, Mudssar</creator><creator>Saeed, Shafqat</creator><creator>Sajjad, Asif</creator><creator>Whittington, Andrew</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>In search of the best pollinators for canola (Brassica napus L.) production in Pakistan</title><author>Ali, Mudssar ; Saeed, Shafqat ; Sajjad, Asif ; Whittington, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-2ba6cb7351463b82199df3b3c2e6bb5a8bf15bf4d34eec9405c2a5acacd2ae423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Apis dorsata</topic><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Halictus</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Research Paper</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mudssar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Shafqat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajjad, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Applied entomology and zoology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Mudssar</au><au>Saeed, Shafqat</au><au>Sajjad, Asif</au><au>Whittington, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In search of the best pollinators for canola (Brassica napus L.) production in Pakistan</atitle><jtitle>Applied entomology and zoology</jtitle><stitle>Appl Entomol Zool</stitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>353-361</pages><issn>0003-6862</issn><eissn>1347-605X</eissn><abstract>To discover the pollinator community of canola (
Brassica napus
L.) and the best pollinators for canola production, an experiment was performed at the research farm of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. The insect pollinator community was composed of 35 species in 3 orders and 14 families. Most of the bees (Hymenoptera) and a butterfly species (Lepidoptera) foraged for nectar, whereas all the flies (Diptera) foraged either for pollen or both nectar and pollen. Eight major pollinators were tested for their pollination efficiency. The nectar-robbing behavior of many species made it difficult to judge the efficiency of an insect on the basis of visitation rate and stay time; therefore, the amounts of pollen deposited and pollen harvested per visit were also measured. The single visit efficiency in terms of the number of seeds per pod revealed that
Apis dorsata
,
A. florea
, and
Halictus
sp. were superior for canola pollination, having Spears’ values of 1.62, 1.55 and 1.73, respectively. With the increase in the number of seeds per pod, seed weight per pod also increased, confirming the importance of these three pollinator species in canola production.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><doi>10.1007/s13355-011-0051-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6862 |
ispartof | Applied entomology and zoology, 2011-08, Vol.46 (3), p.353-361 |
issn | 0003-6862 1347-605X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1017972647 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Agriculture Apis dorsata Applied Ecology Biomedical and Life Sciences Brassica napus Diptera Entomology Environmental Management Halictus Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Life Sciences Original Research Paper Plant Pathology Zoology |
title | In search of the best pollinators for canola (Brassica napus L.) production in Pakistan |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A28%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20search%20of%20the%20best%20pollinators%20for%20canola%20(Brassica%20napus%20L.)%20production%20in%20Pakistan&rft.jtitle=Applied%20entomology%20and%20zoology&rft.au=Ali,%20Mudssar&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=353-361&rft.issn=0003-6862&rft.eissn=1347-605X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13355-011-0051-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017972647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-2ba6cb7351463b82199df3b3c2e6bb5a8bf15bf4d34eec9405c2a5acacd2ae423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017972647&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |