Glass wool filtration of bull cryopreserved semen: A rapid and effective method to obtain a high percentage of functional sperm

• Published in: Theriogenology 2012-07, Vol.78 (1), p.201-209
• Main Authors: Arzondo, M.M., Caballero, J.N., Marín-Briggiler, C.I., Dalvit, G., Cetica, P.D., Vazquez-Levin, M.H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acrosomal exocytosis; Animals; assisted reproductive technologies; Bovine; bulls; calcium; Capacitation; Cattle; Cell Count; Cell Separation - methods; cryopreservation; Cryopreservation - veterinary; endangered species; Female; filtration; Filtration - methods; follicular fluid; Glass; Glass wool filtration; glucose; heparin; Holstein; In vitro fertilization; Male; oocytes; selection methods; Semen; Semen Analysis; Semen Preservation - methods; Semen Preservation - veterinary; Sperm; Sperm-Ovum Interactions - physiology; spermatozoa; Spermatozoa - cytology; Spermatozoa - physiology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; wool
• ISSN: 0093-691X; 1879-3231
• DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.02.001

Frozen-thawed bull sperm are widely used in assisted reproductive technologies, but cryopreservation negatively affects semen quality. Several sperm selection techniques have been developed to separate motile sperm from non-motile cells. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the glass wool column filtration to select functional sperm from frozen-thawed bull semen samples. Frozen semen from six Holstein bulls was thawed and filtered through a glass wool column, followed by assessment of routine and functional sperm parameters. In a set of experiments, sperm aliquots were also processed by swim up to compare both selection methods. Samples recovered in the glass wool filtrate had high percentages of viable (94 ± 3%, mean ± SD), progressively motile (89 ± 4%), acrosome-intact (98 ± 1%), and non-capacitated (80 ± 10%) sperm; these values were higher (P < 0.05) than those obtained after performing the swim up procedure. Moreover, the glass wool filtration yielded 67 ± 19% motile cells, in comparison with 18 ± 8% obtained with swim up (P < 0.05), calculated as the concentration of progressively motile cells selected relative to their concentration in the sample before the selection procedure. Glass wool-filtered sperm were able to undergo capacitation-related events, based on the increase in the percentage of cells classified as capacitated by CTC staining (B-pattern) after incubation with heparin (50 ± 5%) in comparison with control conditions with no heparin (17 ± 4%) or heparin + glucose (16 ± 2%; P < 0.05). Moreover, they underwent acrosomal exocytosis in response to pharmacologic (calcium ionophore A23187 and lysophosphatidylcholine) and physiological (follicular fluid) stimuli, and they fertilized in vitro matured cumulus-oocyte complexes and denuded oocytes (two-cell embryos: 72 ± 4% and 52 ± 6%, respectively). We conclude that glass wool filtration is a low-cost, simple, and highly effective procedure to select functionally competent sperm for reproductive technologies in the bull, which may be useful for other domestic and farm animals, as well as for endangered species.