Loading…
Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor
Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coup...
Saved in:
Published in: | Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2012-05, Vol.113 (5), p.e40-e44 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083 |
container_end_page | e44 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e40 |
container_title | Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS Scarbecz, Mark, PhD Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS |
description | Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019098302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2212440312000235</els_id><sourcerecordid>1019098302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpaUKSL9BD0TGX3eiPLVtQCiUkbSCQQlvoTcjSbKutVtpIdsh--4yzSQ45dBiQDr95vHlDyAfOlpxxdbZeZqylYJwvsRnr35BDIbhYNA3nb1_-TB6Qk1rXDEvhYCPekwMhlOqV7A_J74s7Gyc7hpxoXtGQRijbku_DxkbqbAlQ6VRD-kPHv0CvvltPBbXJU0tjuJ2Cp67s6oiwD3Ub7Y5ucgpjLsfk3crGCidP7xH5dXnx8_zb4vrm69X5l-uFQ5vjQgm5gl6KodetV00nO8eEdmjb6qZrBq07NA285V5b3YrGsU4qroZW9u3AenlETve66Pp2gjqaTagOYrQJ8lQNhqWZ7iUTiIo96kqutcDKbAvuWXYIzZwyazOHauZQDTZ71P_4pD8NG_AvI88RIvBpDwBueRegmOoCJAc-FHCj8Tn8X__zq3EXQwrOxn-wg7rOU0mYn-GmCsPMj_ms81W5wIMK2coHYlWawA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019098302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS ; Scarbecz, Mark, PhD ; Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creator><creatorcontrib>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS ; Scarbecz, Mark, PhD ; Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-4403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-4411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22668638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Computer Peripherals ; Computers, Handheld ; Data Display ; Dental Caries - pathology ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Liquid Crystals ; Radiography, Bitewing ; Radiography, Dental, Digital ; Semiconductors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2012-05, Vol.113 (5), p.e40-e44</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22668638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Computer Peripherals</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld</subject><subject>Data Display</subject><subject>Dental Caries - pathology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liquid Crystals</subject><subject>Radiography, Bitewing</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital</subject><subject>Semiconductors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2212-4403</issn><issn>2212-4411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpaUKSL9BD0TGX3eiPLVtQCiUkbSCQQlvoTcjSbKutVtpIdsh--4yzSQ45dBiQDr95vHlDyAfOlpxxdbZeZqylYJwvsRnr35BDIbhYNA3nb1_-TB6Qk1rXDEvhYCPekwMhlOqV7A_J74s7Gyc7hpxoXtGQRijbku_DxkbqbAlQ6VRD-kPHv0CvvltPBbXJU0tjuJ2Cp67s6oiwD3Ub7Y5ucgpjLsfk3crGCidP7xH5dXnx8_zb4vrm69X5l-uFQ5vjQgm5gl6KodetV00nO8eEdmjb6qZrBq07NA285V5b3YrGsU4qroZW9u3AenlETve66Pp2gjqaTagOYrQJ8lQNhqWZ7iUTiIo96kqutcDKbAvuWXYIzZwyazOHauZQDTZ71P_4pD8NG_AvI88RIvBpDwBueRegmOoCJAc-FHCj8Tn8X__zq3EXQwrOxn-wg7rOU0mYn-GmCsPMj_ms81W5wIMK2coHYlWawA</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</creator><creator>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</creator><creator>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</title><author>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS ; Scarbecz, Mark, PhD ; Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Computer Peripherals</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld</topic><topic>Data Display</topic><topic>Dental Caries - pathology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liquid Crystals</topic><topic>Radiography, Bitewing</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital</topic><topic>Semiconductors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</au><au>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</au><au>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e40</spage><epage>e44</epage><pages>e40-e44</pages><issn>2212-4403</issn><eissn>2212-4411</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22668638</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2212-4403 |
ispartof | Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2012-05, Vol.113 (5), p.e40-e44 |
issn | 2212-4403 2212-4411 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019098302 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adult Computer Peripherals Computers, Handheld Data Display Dental Caries - pathology Dentistry Humans Liquid Crystals Radiography, Bitewing Radiography, Dental, Digital Semiconductors Sensitivity and Specificity Statistics, Nonparametric Surgery |
title | Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A55%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20interproximal%20caries%20using%20the%20IPad%202%20and%20a%20liquid%20crystal%20display%20monitor&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology%20and%20oral%20radiology&rft.au=Shintaku,%20Werner%20H.,%20DDS,%20MS&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e40&rft.epage=e44&rft.pages=e40-e44&rft.issn=2212-4403&rft.eissn=2212-4411&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1019098302%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019098302&rft_id=info:pmid/22668638&rfr_iscdi=true |