Loading…

Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coup...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2012-05, Vol.113 (5), p.e40-e44
Main Authors: Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS, Scarbecz, Mark, PhD, Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083
container_end_page e44
container_issue 5
container_start_page e40
container_title Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology
container_volume 113
creator Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS
Scarbecz, Mark, PhD
Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS
description Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019098302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2212440312000235</els_id><sourcerecordid>1019098302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpaUKSL9BD0TGX3eiPLVtQCiUkbSCQQlvoTcjSbKutVtpIdsh--4yzSQ45dBiQDr95vHlDyAfOlpxxdbZeZqylYJwvsRnr35BDIbhYNA3nb1_-TB6Qk1rXDEvhYCPekwMhlOqV7A_J74s7Gyc7hpxoXtGQRijbku_DxkbqbAlQ6VRD-kPHv0CvvltPBbXJU0tjuJ2Cp67s6oiwD3Ub7Y5ucgpjLsfk3crGCidP7xH5dXnx8_zb4vrm69X5l-uFQ5vjQgm5gl6KodetV00nO8eEdmjb6qZrBq07NA285V5b3YrGsU4qroZW9u3AenlETve66Pp2gjqaTagOYrQJ8lQNhqWZ7iUTiIo96kqutcDKbAvuWXYIzZwyazOHauZQDTZ71P_4pD8NG_AvI88RIvBpDwBueRegmOoCJAc-FHCj8Tn8X__zq3EXQwrOxn-wg7rOU0mYn-GmCsPMj_ms81W5wIMK2coHYlWawA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1019098302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS ; Scarbecz, Mark, PhD ; Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creator><creatorcontrib>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS ; Scarbecz, Mark, PhD ; Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-4403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-4411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22668638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Computer Peripherals ; Computers, Handheld ; Data Display ; Dental Caries - pathology ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Liquid Crystals ; Radiography, Bitewing ; Radiography, Dental, Digital ; Semiconductors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2012-05, Vol.113 (5), p.e40-e44</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22668638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Computer Peripherals</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld</subject><subject>Data Display</subject><subject>Dental Caries - pathology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liquid Crystals</subject><subject>Radiography, Bitewing</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital</subject><subject>Semiconductors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2212-4403</issn><issn>2212-4411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpaUKSL9BD0TGX3eiPLVtQCiUkbSCQQlvoTcjSbKutVtpIdsh--4yzSQ45dBiQDr95vHlDyAfOlpxxdbZeZqylYJwvsRnr35BDIbhYNA3nb1_-TB6Qk1rXDEvhYCPekwMhlOqV7A_J74s7Gyc7hpxoXtGQRijbku_DxkbqbAlQ6VRD-kPHv0CvvltPBbXJU0tjuJ2Cp67s6oiwD3Ub7Y5ucgpjLsfk3crGCidP7xH5dXnx8_zb4vrm69X5l-uFQ5vjQgm5gl6KodetV00nO8eEdmjb6qZrBq07NA285V5b3YrGsU4qroZW9u3AenlETve66Pp2gjqaTagOYrQJ8lQNhqWZ7iUTiIo96kqutcDKbAvuWXYIzZwyazOHauZQDTZ71P_4pD8NG_AvI88RIvBpDwBueRegmOoCJAc-FHCj8Tn8X__zq3EXQwrOxn-wg7rOU0mYn-GmCsPMj_ms81W5wIMK2coHYlWawA</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</creator><creator>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</creator><creator>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</title><author>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS ; Scarbecz, Mark, PhD ; Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Computer Peripherals</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld</topic><topic>Data Display</topic><topic>Dental Caries - pathology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liquid Crystals</topic><topic>Radiography, Bitewing</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital</topic><topic>Semiconductors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shintaku, Werner H., DDS, MS</au><au>Scarbecz, Mark, PhD</au><au>Venturin, Jaqueline S., DDS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e40</spage><epage>e44</epage><pages>e40-e44</pages><issn>2212-4403</issn><eissn>2212-4411</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective of this study was to compare the detection of interproximal caries in digital intraoral images presented in a 24-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and the IPad 2. Study Design Twenty-seven digital bitewing radiographs of 102 adult teeth were generated by a charge-coupled device sensor and presented to 4 dentists in 2 sessions. The dentists were asked to rate the presence or absence of carious lesions using a 5-point scale. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were weighted using the Wilcoxon test, and the z test for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results For the IPad 2 and LCD monitor, Az values were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. For the tablet, the mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively. For the LCD monitor, these values were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22668638</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2212-4403
ispartof Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2012-05, Vol.113 (5), p.e40-e44
issn 2212-4403
2212-4411
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1019098302
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Computer Peripherals
Computers, Handheld
Data Display
Dental Caries - pathology
Dentistry
Humans
Liquid Crystals
Radiography, Bitewing
Radiography, Dental, Digital
Semiconductors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surgery
title Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A55%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20interproximal%20caries%20using%20the%20IPad%202%20and%20a%20liquid%20crystal%20display%20monitor&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology%20and%20oral%20radiology&rft.au=Shintaku,%20Werner%20H.,%20DDS,%20MS&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e40&rft.epage=e44&rft.pages=e40-e44&rft.issn=2212-4403&rft.eissn=2212-4411&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1019098302%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-623fe832b895d64737c029c403a9474b997016e151d9a9524c073616b5385b083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1019098302&rft_id=info:pmid/22668638&rfr_iscdi=true