Mebrofenin Clearance Rate for Liver Function Testing: Standardization of Methodology Aimed to Improve Intraobserver Reproducibility

OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to assess which region of interest results in the best intraobserver reproducibility of mebrofenin clearance rate (MCR) processing. METHODSMebrofenin clearance rate was calculated according to Ekman’s formalism. Processing methods included smaller left ventricular (LV) vers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical nuclear medicine 2012-07, Vol.37 (7), p.644-648
Main Authors: Tulchinsky, Mark, Tun, Kyaw N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Imino Acids
Linear Models
Liver Function Tests - methods
Liver Function Tests - standards
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Organotechnetium Compounds
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to assess which region of interest results in the best intraobserver reproducibility of mebrofenin clearance rate (MCR) processing. METHODSMebrofenin clearance rate was calculated according to Ekman’s formalism. Processing methods included smaller left ventricular (LV) versus larger regions, nearly the whole heart (WH), which were applied to either anterior (ANT) or geometric mean (GEO) data. Each variation was processed twice by an expert operator, and Pearson linear correlation (r) was used to test for reproducibility. RESULTSStudies from 50 patients (16 women) were available for processing. Mean (SD) for age, model for end-stage liver disease, and Child scores were 54 (10) years (range, 23–70 y), 13.1 (4.9) (range, 6–30), and 7.8 (2.1) (range, 5–14), respectively. The linear correlation equations (r, significance) between the 2 processing takes were y = 0.34x + 4.3 (r = 0.5442, P < 0.0001) for MCR-LV-ANT, y = 0.94x + 0.33 (r = 0.9464, P < 0.0001) for MCR-LV-GEO, y = 0.87x + 0.50 (r = 0.9760, P < 0.0001) for MCR-WH-ANT, and y = 0.92x + 0.24 (r = 0.9898, P < 0.0001) for MCR-WH-GEO. The MCR-WH-GEO method had statistically better reproducibility when compared with the other methods. CONCLUSIONSThe highest reproducibility was found with the technique that used geometric mean data and the larger blood pool region of interest. Further work should address training approaches that foster optimal interoperator reproducibility, which could allow for wider implementation of this liver function parameter.
ISSN:0363-9762
1536-0229
DOI:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318257982a