Loading…

Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility

Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six tertiary care centres in Ind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of medical microbiology 2011-04, Vol.29 (2), p.161-164
Main Authors: Manoharan, A, Premalatha, K, Chatterjee, S, Mathai, D, SARI Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 161
container_title Indian journal of medical microbiology
container_volume 29
creator Manoharan, A
Premalatha, K
Chatterjee, S
Mathai, D
SARI Study Group
description Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp. (122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%), meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin (89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates. Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance surveillance is warranted in light of these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0255-0857.81799
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0255085721012147</els_id><sourcerecordid>2374152251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EEktCTWtRUTCb8dhzcYlWG4KUiCJLlM7y5Qw50Yy92J5AHoJ3xstCCgokS5aPv_9c_kPIG1avBav5Wd20bVUPbb8eWC_lM7JiUg4V70T3nKyefl-SVynd1-UtpFiRn5sQI0w6Y_A0jHS3vXpPry9uqPaObna31RWFHxm8A1elPdgcl5kayJpO2mY96wSJ6jn4r3TrM8RgShgiagsa6HfMdzTfAUaKnj5gjqEkzjijLSTqiaYlWdhnNDhhfjwlL0Y9JXj95z4hX863u81Fdfn546fNh8vKiKHLVT-4UQ6SGWcEyJ43bWdlyzmMVmoGRjcSBNiulq5tBOtBNsZxaeXYCwFC8BPy7ph3H8O3BVJWM5Y-pkl7CEtSrG7qgUvWNQV9-w96H5boS3dq6A9ALXiBzo5QGSulCKPaR5x1fCyZ1GE76uC_Ovivfm-nKORRAWXMB4SokkXwFhzG4rJyAf-jXR-1BsOEHp6K2eK7-hucTTms6Hv-CxFoptA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871623043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Manoharan, A ; Premalatha, K ; Chatterjee, S ; Mathai, D ; SARI Study Group</creator><creatorcontrib>Manoharan, A ; Premalatha, K ; Chatterjee, S ; Mathai, D ; SARI Study Group ; SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp. (122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%), meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin (89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates. Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance surveillance is warranted in light of these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0255-0857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.81799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chandigarh: Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Association of Medical Microbiology</publisher><subject>Amikacin ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteria ; Bacterial infections ; Carbapenems ; Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible ; Ceftriaxone ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Enterobacter ; Enterobacteriaceae ; ertapenem ; Escherichia coli ; extended-spectrum beta lactamase ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Imipenem ; Infections ; Klebsiella ; Levofloxacin ; Meropenem ; Methods ; Microbiology ; Minimum inhibitory concentration ; Piperacillin ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Quality control ; resistance ; susceptible ; Tazobactam ; Typing</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-04, Vol.29 (2), p.161-164</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2011 Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology.</rights><rights>2011 Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871623043/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871623043?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manoharan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premalatha, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</title><title>Indian journal of medical microbiology</title><description>Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp. (122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%), meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin (89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates. Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance surveillance is warranted in light of these findings.</description><subject>Amikacin</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Carbapenems</subject><subject>Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Enterobacter</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>ertapenem</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>extended-spectrum beta lactamase</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Imipenem</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Klebsiella</subject><subject>Levofloxacin</subject><subject>Meropenem</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Minimum inhibitory concentration</subject><subject>Piperacillin</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>susceptible</subject><subject>Tazobactam</subject><subject>Typing</subject><issn>0255-0857</issn><issn>1998-3646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EEktCTWtRUTCb8dhzcYlWG4KUiCJLlM7y5Qw50Yy92J5AHoJ3xstCCgokS5aPv_9c_kPIG1avBav5Wd20bVUPbb8eWC_lM7JiUg4V70T3nKyefl-SVynd1-UtpFiRn5sQI0w6Y_A0jHS3vXpPry9uqPaObna31RWFHxm8A1elPdgcl5kayJpO2mY96wSJ6jn4r3TrM8RgShgiagsa6HfMdzTfAUaKnj5gjqEkzjijLSTqiaYlWdhnNDhhfjwlL0Y9JXj95z4hX863u81Fdfn546fNh8vKiKHLVT-4UQ6SGWcEyJ43bWdlyzmMVmoGRjcSBNiulq5tBOtBNsZxaeXYCwFC8BPy7ph3H8O3BVJWM5Y-pkl7CEtSrG7qgUvWNQV9-w96H5boS3dq6A9ALXiBzo5QGSulCKPaR5x1fCyZ1GE76uC_Ovivfm-nKORRAWXMB4SokkXwFhzG4rJyAf-jXR-1BsOEHp6K2eK7-hucTTms6Hv-CxFoptA</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Manoharan, A</creator><creator>Premalatha, K</creator><creator>Chatterjee, S</creator><creator>Mathai, D</creator><creator>SARI Study Group</creator><general>Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Association of Medical Microbiology</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>RBI</scope><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</title><author>Manoharan, A ; Premalatha, K ; Chatterjee, S ; Mathai, D ; SARI Study Group</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Amikacin</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Carbapenems</topic><topic>Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Enterobacter</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>ertapenem</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>extended-spectrum beta lactamase</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Imipenem</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Klebsiella</topic><topic>Levofloxacin</topic><topic>Meropenem</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Minimum inhibitory concentration</topic><topic>Piperacillin</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>susceptible</topic><topic>Tazobactam</topic><topic>Typing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manoharan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premalatha, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Bioline International</collection><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manoharan, A</au><au>Premalatha, K</au><au>Chatterjee, S</au><au>Mathai, D</au><au>SARI Study Group</au><aucorp>SARI Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>161-164</pages><issn>0255-0857</issn><eissn>1998-3646</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp. (122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%), meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin (89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates. Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance surveillance is warranted in light of these findings.</abstract><cop>Chandigarh</cop><pub>Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Association of Medical Microbiology</pub><doi>10.4103/0255-0857.81799</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0255-0857
ispartof Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-04, Vol.29 (2), p.161-164
issn 0255-0857
1998-3646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839162
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Amikacin
Antimicrobial agents
Bacteria
Bacterial infections
Carbapenems
Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible
Ceftriaxone
Drug resistance
E coli
Enterobacter
Enterobacteriaceae
ertapenem
Escherichia coli
extended-spectrum beta lactamase
Gram-negative bacteria
Imipenem
Infections
Klebsiella
Levofloxacin
Meropenem
Methods
Microbiology
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Piperacillin
Polymerase chain reaction
Quality control
resistance
susceptible
Tazobactam
Typing
title Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20TEM,%20SHV%20and%20CTX-M%20extended-spectrum%20beta%20lactamases%20among%20Enterobacteriaceae%20with%20their%20in%20vitro%20antimicrobial%20susceptibility&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20medical%20microbiology&rft.au=Manoharan,%20A&rft.aucorp=SARI%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=161-164&rft.issn=0255-0857&rft.eissn=1998-3646&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0255-0857.81799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2374152251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871623043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true