Loading…
Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility
Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six tertiary care centres in Ind...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of medical microbiology 2011-04, Vol.29 (2), p.161-164 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443 |
container_end_page | 164 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Indian journal of medical microbiology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Manoharan, A Premalatha, K Chatterjee, S Mathai, D SARI Study Group |
description | Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL
types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of
Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance
study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six
tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our
reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were
selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present
study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp.
(122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was
performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of
imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin,
piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test
method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain
reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed
excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%),
meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin
(89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M
were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella
spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates.
Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this
was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue
to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative
to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance
surveillance is warranted in light of these findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/0255-0857.81799 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0255085721012147</els_id><sourcerecordid>2374152251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EEktCTWtRUTCb8dhzcYlWG4KUiCJLlM7y5Qw50Yy92J5AHoJ3xstCCgokS5aPv_9c_kPIG1avBav5Wd20bVUPbb8eWC_lM7JiUg4V70T3nKyefl-SVynd1-UtpFiRn5sQI0w6Y_A0jHS3vXpPry9uqPaObna31RWFHxm8A1elPdgcl5kayJpO2mY96wSJ6jn4r3TrM8RgShgiagsa6HfMdzTfAUaKnj5gjqEkzjijLSTqiaYlWdhnNDhhfjwlL0Y9JXj95z4hX863u81Fdfn546fNh8vKiKHLVT-4UQ6SGWcEyJ43bWdlyzmMVmoGRjcSBNiulq5tBOtBNsZxaeXYCwFC8BPy7ph3H8O3BVJWM5Y-pkl7CEtSrG7qgUvWNQV9-w96H5boS3dq6A9ALXiBzo5QGSulCKPaR5x1fCyZ1GE76uC_Ovivfm-nKORRAWXMB4SokkXwFhzG4rJyAf-jXR-1BsOEHp6K2eK7-hucTTms6Hv-CxFoptA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871623043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Manoharan, A ; Premalatha, K ; Chatterjee, S ; Mathai, D ; SARI Study Group</creator><creatorcontrib>Manoharan, A ; Premalatha, K ; Chatterjee, S ; Mathai, D ; SARI Study Group ; SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL
types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of
Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance
study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six
tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our
reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were
selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present
study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp.
(122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was
performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of
imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin,
piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test
method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain
reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed
excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%),
meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin
(89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M
were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella
spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates.
Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this
was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue
to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative
to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance
surveillance is warranted in light of these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0255-0857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.81799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chandigarh: Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Association of Medical Microbiology</publisher><subject>Amikacin ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteria ; Bacterial infections ; Carbapenems ; Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible ; Ceftriaxone ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Enterobacter ; Enterobacteriaceae ; ertapenem ; Escherichia coli ; extended-spectrum beta lactamase ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Imipenem ; Infections ; Klebsiella ; Levofloxacin ; Meropenem ; Methods ; Microbiology ; Minimum inhibitory concentration ; Piperacillin ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Quality control ; resistance ; susceptible ; Tazobactam ; Typing</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-04, Vol.29 (2), p.161-164</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2011 Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology.</rights><rights>2011 Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871623043/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871623043?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manoharan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premalatha, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</title><title>Indian journal of medical microbiology</title><description>Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL
types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of
Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance
study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six
tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our
reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were
selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present
study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp.
(122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was
performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of
imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin,
piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test
method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain
reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed
excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%),
meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin
(89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M
were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella
spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates.
Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this
was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue
to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative
to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance
surveillance is warranted in light of these findings.</description><subject>Amikacin</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Carbapenems</subject><subject>Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Enterobacter</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>ertapenem</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>extended-spectrum beta lactamase</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Imipenem</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Klebsiella</subject><subject>Levofloxacin</subject><subject>Meropenem</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Minimum inhibitory concentration</subject><subject>Piperacillin</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>susceptible</subject><subject>Tazobactam</subject><subject>Typing</subject><issn>0255-0857</issn><issn>1998-3646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EEktCTWtRUTCb8dhzcYlWG4KUiCJLlM7y5Qw50Yy92J5AHoJ3xstCCgokS5aPv_9c_kPIG1avBav5Wd20bVUPbb8eWC_lM7JiUg4V70T3nKyefl-SVynd1-UtpFiRn5sQI0w6Y_A0jHS3vXpPry9uqPaObna31RWFHxm8A1elPdgcl5kayJpO2mY96wSJ6jn4r3TrM8RgShgiagsa6HfMdzTfAUaKnj5gjqEkzjijLSTqiaYlWdhnNDhhfjwlL0Y9JXj95z4hX863u81Fdfn546fNh8vKiKHLVT-4UQ6SGWcEyJ43bWdlyzmMVmoGRjcSBNiulq5tBOtBNsZxaeXYCwFC8BPy7ph3H8O3BVJWM5Y-pkl7CEtSrG7qgUvWNQV9-w96H5boS3dq6A9ALXiBzo5QGSulCKPaR5x1fCyZ1GE76uC_Ovivfm-nKORRAWXMB4SokkXwFhzG4rJyAf-jXR-1BsOEHp6K2eK7-hucTTms6Hv-CxFoptA</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Manoharan, A</creator><creator>Premalatha, K</creator><creator>Chatterjee, S</creator><creator>Mathai, D</creator><creator>SARI Study Group</creator><general>Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Association of Medical Microbiology</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>RBI</scope><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</title><author>Manoharan, A ; Premalatha, K ; Chatterjee, S ; Mathai, D ; SARI Study Group</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Amikacin</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Carbapenems</topic><topic>Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Enterobacter</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>ertapenem</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>extended-spectrum beta lactamase</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Imipenem</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Klebsiella</topic><topic>Levofloxacin</topic><topic>Meropenem</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Minimum inhibitory concentration</topic><topic>Piperacillin</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>susceptible</topic><topic>Tazobactam</topic><topic>Typing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manoharan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premalatha, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathai, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SARI Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Bioline International</collection><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manoharan, A</au><au>Premalatha, K</au><au>Chatterjee, S</au><au>Mathai, D</au><au>SARI Study Group</au><aucorp>SARI Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>161-164</pages><issn>0255-0857</issn><eissn>1998-3646</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The present study was carried out to characterize the ESBL
types and evaluated their in vitro activity against a collection of
Gram negative bacteria (GNB) from a multicentric Indian surveillance
study. Material and Methods: During January 2005 to June 2006, six
tertiary care centres in India forwarded 778 non-duplicate GNB to our
reference laboratory. Three hundred GNB from this collection were
selected based on clinical significance and were used in the present
study. Tested isolates included Escherichia coli (167), Klebsiella spp.
(122) and Enterobacter spp. (11). ESBL screening and confirmation was
performed for all the isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration of
imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, amikacin,
piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone was determined by the E-test
method. Molecular typing of the ESBLs was performed by polymerase chain
reaction among the 121 selected isolates. Results: The study showed
excellent susceptibility among the strains to imipenem (100%),
meropenem (100%) and ertapenem (98.7%); good susceptibility to amikacin
(89.7%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (85.3%) was observed. TEM and CTX-M
were predominantly found in E. coli (39.2%) while, among the Klebsiella
spp., TEM, SHV and CTX-M occurred together in 42.6% of the isolates.
Conclusion: More than one ESBL was produced by many strains, and this
was correlated with increased resistance levels. Carbapenems continue
to show good in vitro activity and ertapenem is a potential alternative
to imipenem and meropenem. Continued antimicrobial resistance
surveillance is warranted in light of these findings.</abstract><cop>Chandigarh</cop><pub>Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Association of Medical Microbiology</pub><doi>10.4103/0255-0857.81799</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0255-0857 |
ispartof | Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-04, Vol.29 (2), p.161-164 |
issn | 0255-0857 1998-3646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020839162 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Amikacin Antimicrobial agents Bacteria Bacterial infections Carbapenems Carbapenems, extended-spectrum beta lactamase, resistance, susceptible Ceftriaxone Drug resistance E coli Enterobacter Enterobacteriaceae ertapenem Escherichia coli extended-spectrum beta lactamase Gram-negative bacteria Imipenem Infections Klebsiella Levofloxacin Meropenem Methods Microbiology Minimum inhibitory concentration Piperacillin Polymerase chain reaction Quality control resistance susceptible Tazobactam Typing |
title | Correlation of TEM, SHV and CTX-M extended-spectrum beta lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20TEM,%20SHV%20and%20CTX-M%20extended-spectrum%20beta%20lactamases%20among%20Enterobacteriaceae%20with%20their%20in%20vitro%20antimicrobial%20susceptibility&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20medical%20microbiology&rft.au=Manoharan,%20A&rft.aucorp=SARI%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=161-164&rft.issn=0255-0857&rft.eissn=1998-3646&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0255-0857.81799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2374152251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b486t-78df9891bdb4e973256c9533efc9a1eba29e4ec609d52417e92bd39c9f744e443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871623043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |