Loading…
Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae
Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of medical microbiology 2011-07, Vol.29 (3), p.297-301 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33 |
container_end_page | 301 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | Indian journal of medical microbiology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Shoorashetty, RM Nagarathnamma, T Prathibha, J |
description | Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/0255-0857.83917 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020846312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0255085721011610</els_id><sourcerecordid>2443841091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ubtu3DAQJIIYyOWSOi3hyo1sUpT4KO3D-QEc4CJxTVDkKqZzEmWSMuDO_5A6P5cvMe_OcBEg1WKXM8OdHYS-UXLaUMLOSN22FZGtOJVMUfEBLahSsmK84R_R4v31E_qc0gMpfaOaBfqzCsNkok9hxKHH-R5wF2IYvcXGeoedT7_wFDKM2ZvsCypDytiMDlvoYfID_H35bbfmad6ad9YA-T443Ie4V3SQwe7J5Yv194sNNkMYf-LzYVpVUwxutr606zFDDJ2xpXhjwcAXdNSbbYKvb3WJ7i7XP1bX1eb26mZ1vqls04hcdazuaM2dYaRTXFDW2ZoyIUTHTK8kYYJyDtI0inBRt0q2pEyc64AqIYGxJTo56JZlHudiUA8-WdgWSxDmpCmpiWw4o3WBHv8DfQhzHMt2WkohCOEljCU6O4BsDClF6PUU_WDic1HSu7T0Lg-9y0Pv0yoMdWBAsfnkIepkPYwWnI_ldtoF_1_uK5VAm2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>887700610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Shoorashetty, RM ; Nagarathnamma, T ; Prathibha, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Shoorashetty, RM ; Nagarathnamma, T ; Prathibha, J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0255-0857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.83917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chandigarh: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acids ; AmpC β-lactamase ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; beta -Lactamase ; boronic acid ; cefepime ; Clinical isolates ; Diffusion ; Drug resistance ; Enterobacteriaceae ; Enzymes ; Extended spectrum β-lactamase ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Plasmids ; Potentiation</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-07, Vol.29 (3), p.297-301</ispartof><rights>2011 Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/887700610/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/887700610?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,74875</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shoorashetty, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarathnamma, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathibha, J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</title><title>Indian journal of medical microbiology</title><description>Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>AmpC β-lactamase</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>beta -Lactamase</subject><subject>boronic acid</subject><subject>cefepime</subject><subject>Clinical isolates</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Extended spectrum β-lactamase</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Potentiation</subject><issn>0255-0857</issn><issn>1998-3646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ubtu3DAQJIIYyOWSOi3hyo1sUpT4KO3D-QEc4CJxTVDkKqZzEmWSMuDO_5A6P5cvMe_OcBEg1WKXM8OdHYS-UXLaUMLOSN22FZGtOJVMUfEBLahSsmK84R_R4v31E_qc0gMpfaOaBfqzCsNkok9hxKHH-R5wF2IYvcXGeoedT7_wFDKM2ZvsCypDytiMDlvoYfID_H35bbfmad6ad9YA-T443Ie4V3SQwe7J5Yv194sNNkMYf-LzYVpVUwxutr606zFDDJ2xpXhjwcAXdNSbbYKvb3WJ7i7XP1bX1eb26mZ1vqls04hcdazuaM2dYaRTXFDW2ZoyIUTHTK8kYYJyDtI0inBRt0q2pEyc64AqIYGxJTo56JZlHudiUA8-WdgWSxDmpCmpiWw4o3WBHv8DfQhzHMt2WkohCOEljCU6O4BsDClF6PUU_WDic1HSu7T0Lg-9y0Pv0yoMdWBAsfnkIepkPYwWnI_ldtoF_1_uK5VAm2Y</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Shoorashetty, RM</creator><creator>Nagarathnamma, T</creator><creator>Prathibha, J</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</title><author>Shoorashetty, RM ; Nagarathnamma, T ; Prathibha, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>AmpC β-lactamase</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>beta -Lactamase</topic><topic>boronic acid</topic><topic>cefepime</topic><topic>Clinical isolates</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Extended spectrum β-lactamase</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Potentiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shoorashetty, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarathnamma, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathibha, J</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shoorashetty, RM</au><au>Nagarathnamma, T</au><au>Prathibha, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>297-301</pages><issn>0255-0857</issn><eissn>1998-3646</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases.</abstract><cop>Chandigarh</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.4103/0255-0857.83917</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0255-0857 |
ispartof | Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-07, Vol.29 (3), p.297-301 |
issn | 0255-0857 1998-3646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020846312 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Acids AmpC β-lactamase Antibiotics Bacteria beta -Lactamase boronic acid cefepime Clinical isolates Diffusion Drug resistance Enterobacteriaceae Enzymes Extended spectrum β-lactamase Gram-negative bacteria Laboratories Methods Plasmids Potentiation |
title | Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A07%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20boronic%20acid%20disk%20potentiation%20test%20and%20cefepime%E2%80%93clavulanic%20acid%20method%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20ESBL%20among%20AmpC-producing%20Enterobacteriaceae&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20medical%20microbiology&rft.au=Shoorashetty,%20RM&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=297-301&rft.issn=0255-0857&rft.eissn=1998-3646&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0255-0857.83917&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2443841091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=887700610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |