Loading…

Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of medical microbiology 2011-07, Vol.29 (3), p.297-301
Main Authors: Shoorashetty, RM, Nagarathnamma, T, Prathibha, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33
container_end_page 301
container_issue 3
container_start_page 297
container_title Indian journal of medical microbiology
container_volume 29
creator Shoorashetty, RM
Nagarathnamma, T
Prathibha, J
description Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0255-0857.83917
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020846312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0255085721011610</els_id><sourcerecordid>2443841091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ubtu3DAQJIIYyOWSOi3hyo1sUpT4KO3D-QEc4CJxTVDkKqZzEmWSMuDO_5A6P5cvMe_OcBEg1WKXM8OdHYS-UXLaUMLOSN22FZGtOJVMUfEBLahSsmK84R_R4v31E_qc0gMpfaOaBfqzCsNkok9hxKHH-R5wF2IYvcXGeoedT7_wFDKM2ZvsCypDytiMDlvoYfID_H35bbfmad6ad9YA-T443Ie4V3SQwe7J5Yv194sNNkMYf-LzYVpVUwxutr606zFDDJ2xpXhjwcAXdNSbbYKvb3WJ7i7XP1bX1eb26mZ1vqls04hcdazuaM2dYaRTXFDW2ZoyIUTHTK8kYYJyDtI0inBRt0q2pEyc64AqIYGxJTo56JZlHudiUA8-WdgWSxDmpCmpiWw4o3WBHv8DfQhzHMt2WkohCOEljCU6O4BsDClF6PUU_WDic1HSu7T0Lg-9y0Pv0yoMdWBAsfnkIepkPYwWnI_ldtoF_1_uK5VAm2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>887700610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Shoorashetty, RM ; Nagarathnamma, T ; Prathibha, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Shoorashetty, RM ; Nagarathnamma, T ; Prathibha, J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0255-0857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.83917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chandigarh: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acids ; AmpC β-lactamase ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; beta -Lactamase ; boronic acid ; cefepime ; Clinical isolates ; Diffusion ; Drug resistance ; Enterobacteriaceae ; Enzymes ; Extended spectrum β-lactamase ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Plasmids ; Potentiation</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-07, Vol.29 (3), p.297-301</ispartof><rights>2011 Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/887700610/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/887700610?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,74875</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shoorashetty, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarathnamma, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathibha, J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</title><title>Indian journal of medical microbiology</title><description>Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>AmpC β-lactamase</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>beta -Lactamase</subject><subject>boronic acid</subject><subject>cefepime</subject><subject>Clinical isolates</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Extended spectrum β-lactamase</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Potentiation</subject><issn>0255-0857</issn><issn>1998-3646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ubtu3DAQJIIYyOWSOi3hyo1sUpT4KO3D-QEc4CJxTVDkKqZzEmWSMuDO_5A6P5cvMe_OcBEg1WKXM8OdHYS-UXLaUMLOSN22FZGtOJVMUfEBLahSsmK84R_R4v31E_qc0gMpfaOaBfqzCsNkok9hxKHH-R5wF2IYvcXGeoedT7_wFDKM2ZvsCypDytiMDlvoYfID_H35bbfmad6ad9YA-T443Ie4V3SQwe7J5Yv194sNNkMYf-LzYVpVUwxutr606zFDDJ2xpXhjwcAXdNSbbYKvb3WJ7i7XP1bX1eb26mZ1vqls04hcdazuaM2dYaRTXFDW2ZoyIUTHTK8kYYJyDtI0inBRt0q2pEyc64AqIYGxJTo56JZlHudiUA8-WdgWSxDmpCmpiWw4o3WBHv8DfQhzHMt2WkohCOEljCU6O4BsDClF6PUU_WDic1HSu7T0Lg-9y0Pv0yoMdWBAsfnkIepkPYwWnI_ldtoF_1_uK5VAm2Y</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Shoorashetty, RM</creator><creator>Nagarathnamma, T</creator><creator>Prathibha, J</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</title><author>Shoorashetty, RM ; Nagarathnamma, T ; Prathibha, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>AmpC β-lactamase</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>beta -Lactamase</topic><topic>boronic acid</topic><topic>cefepime</topic><topic>Clinical isolates</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Extended spectrum β-lactamase</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Potentiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shoorashetty, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarathnamma, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathibha, J</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shoorashetty, RM</au><au>Nagarathnamma, T</au><au>Prathibha, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of medical microbiology</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>297-301</pages><issn>0255-0857</issn><eissn>1998-3646</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamase are important mechanisms of betalactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae. The ESBL confirmation test described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) is in routine use. This method fails to detect ESBL in the presence of AmpC. Therefore, we compared two different ESBL detection methods against the CLSI confirmatory test. Materials and Methods: A total 200 consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from various clinical samples were tested for ESBL production using (i) CLSI described phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), (ii) boronic acid disk potentiation test and (iii) cefepime–CA disk potentiation method. AmpC confirmation was done by a modified three-dimensional test. Results: Among total 200 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 82 were only ESBL producers, 12 were only AmpC producers, 55 were combined ESBL and AmpC producers, 14 were inducible AmpC producers and 37 isolates did not harboured any enzymes. The CLSI described PCT detected ESBL-producing organisms correctly but failed to detect 36.3% of ESBLs among combined enzyme producers. The boronic acid disk potentiation test reliably detected all ESBL, AmpC, and combined enzyme producers correctly. The cefepime–CA method detected all ESBLs correctly but another method of AmpC detection has to be adopted. Conclusion: The use of boronic acid in disk diffusion testing along with the CLSI described PCT enhances ESBL detection in the presence of AmpC betalactamases.</abstract><cop>Chandigarh</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.4103/0255-0857.83917</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0255-0857
ispartof Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2011-07, Vol.29 (3), p.297-301
issn 0255-0857
1998-3646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1020846312
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Acids
AmpC β-lactamase
Antibiotics
Bacteria
beta -Lactamase
boronic acid
cefepime
Clinical isolates
Diffusion
Drug resistance
Enterobacteriaceae
Enzymes
Extended spectrum β-lactamase
Gram-negative bacteria
Laboratories
Methods
Plasmids
Potentiation
title Comparison of the boronic acid disk potentiation test and cefepime–clavulanic acid method for the detection of ESBL among AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A07%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20boronic%20acid%20disk%20potentiation%20test%20and%20cefepime%E2%80%93clavulanic%20acid%20method%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20ESBL%20among%20AmpC-producing%20Enterobacteriaceae&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20medical%20microbiology&rft.au=Shoorashetty,%20RM&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=297-301&rft.issn=0255-0857&rft.eissn=1998-3646&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0255-0857.83917&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2443841091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-b32b126da30b96713bc213777b3af98037166e8a49067259850716ddbe1978e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=887700610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true