Loading…
A holistic water balance of Austria - how does the quantitative proportion of urban water requirements relate to other users?
Traditional water use statistics only include the blue water withdrawal/consumption of municipalities, industry and irrigated agriculture. When, however, green water use of the agricultural sector is included as well as the virtual water use/water footprint (WF), water use quantity statistics become...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water science and technology 2012-01, Vol.66 (3), p.549-555 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d6ea075a62ffa4b13268f2ac77282243603c6900b33ab82c9cac28944432e6803 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 555 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 549 |
container_title | Water science and technology |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Vanham, D |
description | Traditional water use statistics only include the blue water withdrawal/consumption of municipalities, industry and irrigated agriculture. When, however, green water use of the agricultural sector is included as well as the virtual water use/water footprint (WF), water use quantity statistics become very different. In common water use statistics, Austria withdraws in total about 2.5 km(3) per year, only 3% of available resources (total discharge 81.4 km(3) = surface and ground water). The total water consumption (0.5 km(3)) is less than 1% of available resources. Urban (municipal) water requirements account for 27% of total withdrawal or 33% of consumption. When agricultural green water use (cropland) is included in statistics, the fraction of municipal water requirements diminishes to 7.6% of total withdrawal and 2.5% of total consumption. If the evapotranspiration of grassland and alpine meadows is also included in agricultural green water use, this fraction decreases to 3.2% and 0.9% respectively. When the WF is assessed as base value for water use in Austria, the municipal water use represents 5.8% of this value. In this globalized world, these traditional water use statistics are no longer recommendable. Only a holistic water balance approach really represents water use statistics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2012.201 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022847290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1022847290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d6ea075a62ffa4b13268f2ac77282243603c6900b33ab82c9cac28944432e6803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkT1PHDEQhq2IKFxIOmpkiYYiC_bY2OsKnRCQSEhpQr3y-maF0d76zh-cKPLf8YqDgmZGHj1-NKOXkGPOzoErdbFL-RwYh7l8IQtujGqMFnBAFgy0aDiAOCTfU3pijGkh2TdyCKClVO3lgvxf0scw-pS9ozubMdLejnZySMNAlyXl6C1tKrOjq4CJ5kek22Kn7LPN_hnpJoZNiNmHaf5RYm-nvSjitviIa5xyqo-xDmkONFRFpCVhTFc_yNfBjgl_7vsRebi9-Xf9u7n_e_fnennfOMFNblYKLdOXVsEwWNlzAaodwDqtoQWQQjHhlGGsF8L2LTjjrIPWSCkFoGqZOCJnb9667bZgyt3aJ4djvRRDSR1nAK3UYGb09BP6FEqc6nYdN1IYVsW6Ur_eKBdDShGHbhP92saXqurmWLoaSzfHMpeKn-ylpV_j6gN-z0G8Al1RiLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943902897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A holistic water balance of Austria - how does the quantitative proportion of urban water requirements relate to other users?</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vanham, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanham, D</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional water use statistics only include the blue water withdrawal/consumption of municipalities, industry and irrigated agriculture. When, however, green water use of the agricultural sector is included as well as the virtual water use/water footprint (WF), water use quantity statistics become very different. In common water use statistics, Austria withdraws in total about 2.5 km(3) per year, only 3% of available resources (total discharge 81.4 km(3) = surface and ground water). The total water consumption (0.5 km(3)) is less than 1% of available resources. Urban (municipal) water requirements account for 27% of total withdrawal or 33% of consumption. When agricultural green water use (cropland) is included in statistics, the fraction of municipal water requirements diminishes to 7.6% of total withdrawal and 2.5% of total consumption. If the evapotranspiration of grassland and alpine meadows is also included in agricultural green water use, this fraction decreases to 3.2% and 0.9% respectively. When the WF is assessed as base value for water use in Austria, the municipal water use represents 5.8% of this value. In this globalized world, these traditional water use statistics are no longer recommendable. Only a holistic water balance approach really represents water use statistics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22744685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Agriculture - statistics & numerical data ; Aquifers ; Austria ; Cities - statistics & numerical data ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Consumption ; Crops ; Evapotranspiration ; Grasslands ; Groundwater ; Hydrology ; Meadows ; Municipal water ; Municipalities ; Resources ; Statistical methods ; Statistics ; Water ; Water balance ; Water consumption ; Water purification ; Water requirements ; Water Supply - statistics & numerical data ; Water use</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2012-01, Vol.66 (3), p.549-555</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d6ea075a62ffa4b13268f2ac77282243603c6900b33ab82c9cac28944432e6803</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22744685$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanham, D</creatorcontrib><title>A holistic water balance of Austria - how does the quantitative proportion of urban water requirements relate to other users?</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Traditional water use statistics only include the blue water withdrawal/consumption of municipalities, industry and irrigated agriculture. When, however, green water use of the agricultural sector is included as well as the virtual water use/water footprint (WF), water use quantity statistics become very different. In common water use statistics, Austria withdraws in total about 2.5 km(3) per year, only 3% of available resources (total discharge 81.4 km(3) = surface and ground water). The total water consumption (0.5 km(3)) is less than 1% of available resources. Urban (municipal) water requirements account for 27% of total withdrawal or 33% of consumption. When agricultural green water use (cropland) is included in statistics, the fraction of municipal water requirements diminishes to 7.6% of total withdrawal and 2.5% of total consumption. If the evapotranspiration of grassland and alpine meadows is also included in agricultural green water use, this fraction decreases to 3.2% and 0.9% respectively. When the WF is assessed as base value for water use in Austria, the municipal water use represents 5.8% of this value. In this globalized world, these traditional water use statistics are no longer recommendable. Only a holistic water balance approach really represents water use statistics.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agriculture - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Cities - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Municipal water</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><subject>Water requirements</subject><subject>Water Supply - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkT1PHDEQhq2IKFxIOmpkiYYiC_bY2OsKnRCQSEhpQr3y-maF0d76zh-cKPLf8YqDgmZGHj1-NKOXkGPOzoErdbFL-RwYh7l8IQtujGqMFnBAFgy0aDiAOCTfU3pijGkh2TdyCKClVO3lgvxf0scw-pS9ozubMdLejnZySMNAlyXl6C1tKrOjq4CJ5kek22Kn7LPN_hnpJoZNiNmHaf5RYm-nvSjitviIa5xyqo-xDmkONFRFpCVhTFc_yNfBjgl_7vsRebi9-Xf9u7n_e_fnennfOMFNblYKLdOXVsEwWNlzAaodwDqtoQWQQjHhlGGsF8L2LTjjrIPWSCkFoGqZOCJnb9667bZgyt3aJ4djvRRDSR1nAK3UYGb09BP6FEqc6nYdN1IYVsW6Ur_eKBdDShGHbhP92saXqurmWLoaSzfHMpeKn-ylpV_j6gN-z0G8Al1RiLg</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Vanham, D</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>A holistic water balance of Austria - how does the quantitative proportion of urban water requirements relate to other users?</title><author>Vanham, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d6ea075a62ffa4b13268f2ac77282243603c6900b33ab82c9cac28944432e6803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agriculture - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Cities - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Municipal water</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><topic>Water requirements</topic><topic>Water Supply - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanham, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanham, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A holistic water balance of Austria - how does the quantitative proportion of urban water requirements relate to other users?</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>549-555</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>Traditional water use statistics only include the blue water withdrawal/consumption of municipalities, industry and irrigated agriculture. When, however, green water use of the agricultural sector is included as well as the virtual water use/water footprint (WF), water use quantity statistics become very different. In common water use statistics, Austria withdraws in total about 2.5 km(3) per year, only 3% of available resources (total discharge 81.4 km(3) = surface and ground water). The total water consumption (0.5 km(3)) is less than 1% of available resources. Urban (municipal) water requirements account for 27% of total withdrawal or 33% of consumption. When agricultural green water use (cropland) is included in statistics, the fraction of municipal water requirements diminishes to 7.6% of total withdrawal and 2.5% of total consumption. If the evapotranspiration of grassland and alpine meadows is also included in agricultural green water use, this fraction decreases to 3.2% and 0.9% respectively. When the WF is assessed as base value for water use in Austria, the municipal water use represents 5.8% of this value. In this globalized world, these traditional water use statistics are no longer recommendable. Only a holistic water balance approach really represents water use statistics.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>22744685</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2012.201</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
ispartof | Water science and technology, 2012-01, Vol.66 (3), p.549-555 |
issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022847290 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agricultural industry Agricultural land Agriculture Agriculture - statistics & numerical data Aquifers Austria Cities - statistics & numerical data Conservation of Natural Resources Consumption Crops Evapotranspiration Grasslands Groundwater Hydrology Meadows Municipal water Municipalities Resources Statistical methods Statistics Water Water balance Water consumption Water purification Water requirements Water Supply - statistics & numerical data Water use |
title | A holistic water balance of Austria - how does the quantitative proportion of urban water requirements relate to other users? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20holistic%20water%20balance%20of%20Austria%20-%20how%20does%20the%20quantitative%20proportion%20of%20urban%20water%20requirements%20relate%20to%20other%20users?&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Vanham,%20D&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=549-555&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2012.201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1022847290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d6ea075a62ffa4b13268f2ac77282243603c6900b33ab82c9cac28944432e6803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943902897&rft_id=info:pmid/22744685&rfr_iscdi=true |