Loading…

Casting defects and high temperature fatigue life of IN 713LC superalloy

High-cycle high temperature fatigue life of a superalloy IN 713LC in as cast state and after hot isostatic pressing was experimentally determined for symmetrical cycling and cycling with tensile mean stress of 300MPa. Fatigue tests were conducted at 800°C in laboratory air. It has been found that th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of fatigue 2012-08, Vol.41, p.47-51
Main Authors: Kunz, Ludvík, Lukáš, Petr, Konečná, Radomila, Fintová, Stanislava
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:High-cycle high temperature fatigue life of a superalloy IN 713LC in as cast state and after hot isostatic pressing was experimentally determined for symmetrical cycling and cycling with tensile mean stress of 300MPa. Fatigue tests were conducted at 800°C in laboratory air. It has been found that the hot isostatic pressing improves the fatigue life. Large casting defects are sites of fatigue crack initiation in both states of the alloy. The hot isostatic pressing reduces the size of casting defects, however the broad scatter band of the lifetime data remains. Determination of casting defects size by optical microscopy on metallographic sections and an analysis of the size distribution by extreme value statistics indicates two types of defects: (i) small isolated defects and (ii) defect clusters consisting of complicated interconnected shrinkages in the three-dimensional space. The size distribution of both types of defects follows the extreme value statistics. This enables to estimate the maximum size of a defect likely to occur in a defined volume. The predicted maximum defect size in a volume of a fatigue specimen reasonable corresponds to the size of defect observed on the fracture surface of failed specimen.
ISSN:0142-1123
1879-3452
DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.002