Loading…

Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment

This paper uses readily accessible aggregate time series to measure the probability that an employed worker becomes unemployed and the probability that an unemployed worker finds a job, the ins and outs of unemployment. Since 1948, the job finding probability has accounted for three-quarters of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of economic dynamics 2012-04, Vol.15 (2), p.127-148
Main Author: Shimer, Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-74bb3008cf32f3f4ede6a9e00909c35a5e1132e8408981174ea035c877ebcf383
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-74bb3008cf32f3f4ede6a9e00909c35a5e1132e8408981174ea035c877ebcf383
container_end_page 148
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
container_title Review of economic dynamics
container_volume 15
creator Shimer, Robert
description This paper uses readily accessible aggregate time series to measure the probability that an employed worker becomes unemployed and the probability that an unemployed worker finds a job, the ins and outs of unemployment. Since 1948, the job finding probability has accounted for three-quarters of the fluctuations in the unemployment rate in the United States and the employment exit probability for one-quarter. Fluctuations in the employment exit probability are quantitatively irrelevant during the last two decades. Using the underlying microeconomic data, the paper shows that these results are not due to compositional changes in the pool of searching workers, nor are they due to movements of workers in and out of the labor force. These results contradict the conventional wisdom that has guided the development of macroeconomic models of the labor market since 1990. ► The job finding rate is strongly procyclical. ► The employment exit probability is weakly countercyclical. ► This holds in models with and without a participation margin. ► This holds after accounting for worker heterogeneity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.red.2012.02.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023193948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1094202512000063</els_id><sourcerecordid>1023193948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-74bb3008cf32f3f4ede6a9e00909c35a5e1132e8408981174ea035c877ebcf383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7-Ad6KJw-2TpJ-BU-y-AULgug5ZNOpprTJmrTC_vemricPwoOZw-89Zh4h5xQyCrS87jKPTcaAsgyigB6QBQVRpiUIcfiz5ykDVhyTkxC6CNASygW5ekEVAoZg7HsyfmBibEiUbRI3jSFxbTJZHLa92w1ox1Ny1Ko-4NnvXJK3-7vX1WO6fn54Wt2uU11wGNMq32w4QK1bzlre5thgqQQCCBCaF6pASjnDOoda1JRWOSrgha6rCjfRU_Mludznbr37nDCMcjBBY98ri24KkgLjVHCRz-jFH7Rzk7fxOilYnXPOSh4huoe0dyF4bOXWm0H5XUySc32yk7E-OdcnIQpo9NzsPRgf_TLoZdAGrcbGeNSjbJz5x_0N0pZ1fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>928433263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Shimer, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Shimer, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>This paper uses readily accessible aggregate time series to measure the probability that an employed worker becomes unemployed and the probability that an unemployed worker finds a job, the ins and outs of unemployment. Since 1948, the job finding probability has accounted for three-quarters of the fluctuations in the unemployment rate in the United States and the employment exit probability for one-quarter. Fluctuations in the employment exit probability are quantitatively irrelevant during the last two decades. Using the underlying microeconomic data, the paper shows that these results are not due to compositional changes in the pool of searching workers, nor are they due to movements of workers in and out of the labor force. These results contradict the conventional wisdom that has guided the development of macroeconomic models of the labor market since 1990. ► The job finding rate is strongly procyclical. ► The employment exit probability is weakly countercyclical. ► This holds in models with and without a participation margin. ► This holds after accounting for worker heterogeneity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-2025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-6099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2012.02.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REDEB7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Orlando: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Economic models ; Employment ; Employment exit rate ; Gross worker flows ; Job finding rate ; Job search ; Labor economics ; Labour market ; Microeconomics ; Probability ; Separation rate ; Studies ; Time series ; Unemployment ; Unemployment levels</subject><ispartof>Review of economic dynamics, 2012-04, Vol.15 (2), p.127-148</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-74bb3008cf32f3f4ede6a9e00909c35a5e1132e8408981174ea035c877ebcf383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-74bb3008cf32f3f4ede6a9e00909c35a5e1132e8408981174ea035c877ebcf383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202,33203</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shimer, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment</title><title>Review of economic dynamics</title><description>This paper uses readily accessible aggregate time series to measure the probability that an employed worker becomes unemployed and the probability that an unemployed worker finds a job, the ins and outs of unemployment. Since 1948, the job finding probability has accounted for three-quarters of the fluctuations in the unemployment rate in the United States and the employment exit probability for one-quarter. Fluctuations in the employment exit probability are quantitatively irrelevant during the last two decades. Using the underlying microeconomic data, the paper shows that these results are not due to compositional changes in the pool of searching workers, nor are they due to movements of workers in and out of the labor force. These results contradict the conventional wisdom that has guided the development of macroeconomic models of the labor market since 1990. ► The job finding rate is strongly procyclical. ► The employment exit probability is weakly countercyclical. ► This holds in models with and without a participation margin. ► This holds after accounting for worker heterogeneity.</description><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment exit rate</subject><subject>Gross worker flows</subject><subject>Job finding rate</subject><subject>Job search</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Separation rate</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment levels</subject><issn>1094-2025</issn><issn>1096-6099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7-Ad6KJw-2TpJ-BU-y-AULgug5ZNOpprTJmrTC_vemricPwoOZw-89Zh4h5xQyCrS87jKPTcaAsgyigB6QBQVRpiUIcfiz5ykDVhyTkxC6CNASygW5ekEVAoZg7HsyfmBibEiUbRI3jSFxbTJZHLa92w1ox1Ny1Ko-4NnvXJK3-7vX1WO6fn54Wt2uU11wGNMq32w4QK1bzlre5thgqQQCCBCaF6pASjnDOoda1JRWOSrgha6rCjfRU_Mludznbr37nDCMcjBBY98ri24KkgLjVHCRz-jFH7Rzk7fxOilYnXPOSh4huoe0dyF4bOXWm0H5XUySc32yk7E-OdcnIQpo9NzsPRgf_TLoZdAGrcbGeNSjbJz5x_0N0pZ1fg</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Shimer, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment</title><author>Shimer, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-74bb3008cf32f3f4ede6a9e00909c35a5e1132e8408981174ea035c877ebcf383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment exit rate</topic><topic>Gross worker flows</topic><topic>Job finding rate</topic><topic>Job search</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Separation rate</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shimer, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Review of economic dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shimer, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment</atitle><jtitle>Review of economic dynamics</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>127-148</pages><issn>1094-2025</issn><eissn>1096-6099</eissn><coden>REDEB7</coden><abstract>This paper uses readily accessible aggregate time series to measure the probability that an employed worker becomes unemployed and the probability that an unemployed worker finds a job, the ins and outs of unemployment. Since 1948, the job finding probability has accounted for three-quarters of the fluctuations in the unemployment rate in the United States and the employment exit probability for one-quarter. Fluctuations in the employment exit probability are quantitatively irrelevant during the last two decades. Using the underlying microeconomic data, the paper shows that these results are not due to compositional changes in the pool of searching workers, nor are they due to movements of workers in and out of the labor force. These results contradict the conventional wisdom that has guided the development of macroeconomic models of the labor market since 1990. ► The job finding rate is strongly procyclical. ► The employment exit probability is weakly countercyclical. ► This holds in models with and without a participation margin. ► This holds after accounting for worker heterogeneity.</abstract><cop>Orlando</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.red.2012.02.001</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-2025
ispartof Review of economic dynamics, 2012-04, Vol.15 (2), p.127-148
issn 1094-2025
1096-6099
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023193948
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Economic models
Employment
Employment exit rate
Gross worker flows
Job finding rate
Job search
Labor economics
Labour market
Microeconomics
Probability
Separation rate
Studies
Time series
Unemployment
Unemployment levels
title Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T15%3A56%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reassessing%20the%20ins%20and%20outs%20of%20unemployment&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20economic%20dynamics&rft.au=Shimer,%20Robert&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=127-148&rft.issn=1094-2025&rft.eissn=1096-6099&rft.coden=REDEB7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.red.2012.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1023193948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-74bb3008cf32f3f4ede6a9e00909c35a5e1132e8408981174ea035c877ebcf383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=928433263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true