Loading…

Follow-up after primary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of extremities: Impact of frequency of follow-up imaging on disease-specific survival

Background and Objectives We explored the impact of frequency of surveillance imaging on disease‐specific survival (DSS) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods Locoregional imaging (LRI) and chest imaging (CI) were used to detect local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surgical oncology 2012-08, Vol.106 (2), p.155-161
Main Authors: Chou, Yi-Sheng, Liu, Chun-Yu, Chen, Wei-Ming, Chen, Tain-Hsiung, Chen, Paul Chih-Hsueh, Wu, Hung-Ta Hondar, Chiou, Hong-Jen, Shiau, Cheng-Ying, Wu, Yu-Chung, Liu, Chien-Lin, Chao, Ta-Chung, Tzeng, Cheng-Hwai, Yen, Chueh-Chuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Objectives We explored the impact of frequency of surveillance imaging on disease‐specific survival (DSS) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods Locoregional imaging (LRI) and chest imaging (CI) were used to detect local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM), respectively. Relapsing patients were retrospectively assigned to more frequent surveillance (MFS) or less frequent surveillance (LFS) groups, according to the median interval for each follow‐up modality. Outcome measures included overall DSS (O‐DSS), post‐LR DSS, and post‐DM DSS. Results We assigned 165 patients to three distinct risk groups according to tumor size (≤5 vs. >5 cm), depth (superficial‐ vs. deep‐seated), grade (I vs. II or III), and surgical margin (≥10 vs.
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.23060