Loading…
Biodiversity in Hudson River shore zones: influence of shoreline type and physical structure
The shore zones of the Hudson River, like those of many developed waterways, are highly varied, containing a mix of seminatural and highly engineered shores. Our goal was to document the biodiversity supported by different kinds of shore zones in the Hudson. We chose six common types of shore zones,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Aquatic sciences 2012-07, Vol.74 (3), p.597-610 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-c4f97b72987ea42888bca3218cb046373fae544684297dcb5efbd2c3c8d1223c3 |
container_end_page | 610 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 597 |
container_title | Aquatic sciences |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Strayer, David L. Findlay, Stuart E. G. Miller, Daniel Malcom, Heather M. Fischer, David T. Coote, Thomas |
description | The shore zones of the Hudson River, like those of many developed waterways, are highly varied, containing a mix of seminatural and highly engineered shores. Our goal was to document the biodiversity supported by different kinds of shore zones in the Hudson. We chose six common types of shore zones, three of them “natural” (sand, unconsolidated rock, and bedrock), and three of them engineered (riprap, cribbing, and bulkheads). We measured selected physical characteristics (shore zone width, exposure, substrate roughness and grain size, shoreline complexity) of three examples of each of these shore types, and also sampled communities of terrestrial plants, fishes, and aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates. Community composition of most taxa differed across shore types, and frequently differed between wide, sheltered shores and narrow, exposed shores. Alien plant species were especially well represented along engineered shores. Nevertheless, a great deal of variation in biological communities was not explained by our six-class categorization of shore zones or the physical variables that we measured. No single shore type supported the highest values of all kinds of biodiversity, but engineered shore zones (especially cribbing and bulkheads) tended to have less desirable biodiversity characteristics than “natural” shore zones. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00027-012-0252-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024664134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024664134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-c4f97b72987ea42888bca3218cb046373fae544684297dcb5efbd2c3c8d1223c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0MFKxDAQBuAgCq6rD-At4MVLNJmkTepNRV1hQRC9CaVNp26WmtakFdant6UexNMMMx_D8BNyKviF4FxfRs45aMYFMA4JsGyPLIQCzjKeJPtjz0XCRArikBzFuOUjNNosyNuNayv3hSG6fkedp6uhiq2nz9OMxk0bkH63HuPVuKybAb1F2tbzpnEeab_rkBa-ot1mF50tGhr7MNh-CHhMDuqiiXjyW5fk9f7u5XbF1k8Pj7fXa9YJk_XMqjrTpYbMaCwUGGNKW0gQxpZcpVLLusBEqdQoyHRlywTrsgIrrakEgLRySc7nu11oPweMff7hosWmKTy2Q8wFB5WmSkg10rN_dNsOwY_fTQomJyYFs4pdcP4dw1-VT4Hnc-D5mGM-BZ5n8gcBO3Ot</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022246614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biodiversity in Hudson River shore zones: influence of shoreline type and physical structure</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Strayer, David L. ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Miller, Daniel ; Malcom, Heather M. ; Fischer, David T. ; Coote, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Strayer, David L. ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Miller, Daniel ; Malcom, Heather M. ; Fischer, David T. ; Coote, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The shore zones of the Hudson River, like those of many developed waterways, are highly varied, containing a mix of seminatural and highly engineered shores. Our goal was to document the biodiversity supported by different kinds of shore zones in the Hudson. We chose six common types of shore zones, three of them “natural” (sand, unconsolidated rock, and bedrock), and three of them engineered (riprap, cribbing, and bulkheads). We measured selected physical characteristics (shore zone width, exposure, substrate roughness and grain size, shoreline complexity) of three examples of each of these shore types, and also sampled communities of terrestrial plants, fishes, and aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates. Community composition of most taxa differed across shore types, and frequently differed between wide, sheltered shores and narrow, exposed shores. Alien plant species were especially well represented along engineered shores. Nevertheless, a great deal of variation in biological communities was not explained by our six-class categorization of shore zones or the physical variables that we measured. No single shore type supported the highest values of all kinds of biodiversity, but engineered shore zones (especially cribbing and bulkheads) tended to have less desirable biodiversity characteristics than “natural” shore zones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1015-1621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00027-012-0252-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecology ; Aquatic plants ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bulkheads ; Community composition ; Ecology ; Estuaries ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Oceanography ; Plant species ; Research Article ; Riprap ; Rivers ; Shorelines ; Shores ; Waterways</subject><ispartof>Aquatic sciences, 2012-07, Vol.74 (3), p.597-610</ispartof><rights>Springer Basel AG 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-c4f97b72987ea42888bca3218cb046373fae544684297dcb5efbd2c3c8d1223c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strayer, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcom, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coote, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Biodiversity in Hudson River shore zones: influence of shoreline type and physical structure</title><title>Aquatic sciences</title><addtitle>Aquat Sci</addtitle><description>The shore zones of the Hudson River, like those of many developed waterways, are highly varied, containing a mix of seminatural and highly engineered shores. Our goal was to document the biodiversity supported by different kinds of shore zones in the Hudson. We chose six common types of shore zones, three of them “natural” (sand, unconsolidated rock, and bedrock), and three of them engineered (riprap, cribbing, and bulkheads). We measured selected physical characteristics (shore zone width, exposure, substrate roughness and grain size, shoreline complexity) of three examples of each of these shore types, and also sampled communities of terrestrial plants, fishes, and aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates. Community composition of most taxa differed across shore types, and frequently differed between wide, sheltered shores and narrow, exposed shores. Alien plant species were especially well represented along engineered shores. Nevertheless, a great deal of variation in biological communities was not explained by our six-class categorization of shore zones or the physical variables that we measured. No single shore type supported the highest values of all kinds of biodiversity, but engineered shore zones (especially cribbing and bulkheads) tended to have less desirable biodiversity characteristics than “natural” shore zones.</description><subject>Aquatic ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bulkheads</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Riprap</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Shorelines</subject><subject>Shores</subject><subject>Waterways</subject><issn>1015-1621</issn><issn>1420-9055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0MFKxDAQBuAgCq6rD-At4MVLNJmkTepNRV1hQRC9CaVNp26WmtakFdant6UexNMMMx_D8BNyKviF4FxfRs45aMYFMA4JsGyPLIQCzjKeJPtjz0XCRArikBzFuOUjNNosyNuNayv3hSG6fkedp6uhiq2nz9OMxk0bkH63HuPVuKybAb1F2tbzpnEeab_rkBa-ot1mF50tGhr7MNh-CHhMDuqiiXjyW5fk9f7u5XbF1k8Pj7fXa9YJk_XMqjrTpYbMaCwUGGNKW0gQxpZcpVLLusBEqdQoyHRlywTrsgIrrakEgLRySc7nu11oPweMff7hosWmKTy2Q8wFB5WmSkg10rN_dNsOwY_fTQomJyYFs4pdcP4dw1-VT4Hnc-D5mGM-BZ5n8gcBO3Ot</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Strayer, David L.</creator><creator>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creator><creator>Miller, Daniel</creator><creator>Malcom, Heather M.</creator><creator>Fischer, David T.</creator><creator>Coote, Thomas</creator><general>SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Biodiversity in Hudson River shore zones: influence of shoreline type and physical structure</title><author>Strayer, David L. ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Miller, Daniel ; Malcom, Heather M. ; Fischer, David T. ; Coote, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-c4f97b72987ea42888bca3218cb046373fae544684297dcb5efbd2c3c8d1223c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bulkheads</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Riprap</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Shorelines</topic><topic>Shores</topic><topic>Waterways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strayer, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcom, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, David T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coote, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strayer, David L.</au><au>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</au><au>Miller, Daniel</au><au>Malcom, Heather M.</au><au>Fischer, David T.</au><au>Coote, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biodiversity in Hudson River shore zones: influence of shoreline type and physical structure</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic sciences</jtitle><stitle>Aquat Sci</stitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>610</epage><pages>597-610</pages><issn>1015-1621</issn><eissn>1420-9055</eissn><abstract>The shore zones of the Hudson River, like those of many developed waterways, are highly varied, containing a mix of seminatural and highly engineered shores. Our goal was to document the biodiversity supported by different kinds of shore zones in the Hudson. We chose six common types of shore zones, three of them “natural” (sand, unconsolidated rock, and bedrock), and three of them engineered (riprap, cribbing, and bulkheads). We measured selected physical characteristics (shore zone width, exposure, substrate roughness and grain size, shoreline complexity) of three examples of each of these shore types, and also sampled communities of terrestrial plants, fishes, and aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates. Community composition of most taxa differed across shore types, and frequently differed between wide, sheltered shores and narrow, exposed shores. Alien plant species were especially well represented along engineered shores. Nevertheless, a great deal of variation in biological communities was not explained by our six-class categorization of shore zones or the physical variables that we measured. No single shore type supported the highest values of all kinds of biodiversity, but engineered shore zones (especially cribbing and bulkheads) tended to have less desirable biodiversity characteristics than “natural” shore zones.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel</pub><doi>10.1007/s00027-012-0252-9</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1015-1621 |
ispartof | Aquatic sciences, 2012-07, Vol.74 (3), p.597-610 |
issn | 1015-1621 1420-9055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024664134 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aquatic ecology Aquatic plants Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Bulkheads Community composition Ecology Estuaries Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Life Sciences Marine & Freshwater Sciences Oceanography Plant species Research Article Riprap Rivers Shorelines Shores Waterways |
title | Biodiversity in Hudson River shore zones: influence of shoreline type and physical structure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biodiversity%20in%20Hudson%20River%20shore%20zones:%20influence%20of%20shoreline%20type%20and%20physical%20structure&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20sciences&rft.au=Strayer,%20David%20L.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=610&rft.pages=597-610&rft.issn=1015-1621&rft.eissn=1420-9055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00027-012-0252-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sprin%3E1024664134%3C/proquest_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p189t-c4f97b72987ea42888bca3218cb046373fae544684297dcb5efbd2c3c8d1223c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022246614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |