Loading…
Radiosynoviorthesis for Treating Recurrent Joint Effusions After Endoprosthetic Knee Replacement
PURPOSERadiosynoviorthesis (RSO) has been established as a treatment modality for rheumatoid arthritis. Other forms of joint diseases like recurrent joint effusions after knee arthroplasties are under investigation. The aim of this study was to examine whether RSO therapy is effective in the applica...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical nuclear medicine 2012-08, Vol.37 (8), p.727-731 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-aae09e239bece8d19e03b1e5436c24b298d63d5d370a55c349f28ffc85f5df2f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-aae09e239bece8d19e03b1e5436c24b298d63d5d370a55c349f28ffc85f5df2f3 |
container_end_page | 731 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 727 |
container_title | Clinical nuclear medicine |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Mayer-Wagner, Susanne Mutzel, Bettina Mayer, Wolfgang Fulghum, Christian Simon, Gerhard Linke, Rainer Jansson, Volkmar |
description | PURPOSERadiosynoviorthesis (RSO) has been established as a treatment modality for rheumatoid arthritis. Other forms of joint diseases like recurrent joint effusions after knee arthroplasties are under investigation. The aim of this study was to examine whether RSO therapy is effective in the application of an endoprosthesis and whether there are common causes of failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween 1998 and 2005, 55 patients received RSO treatment (Y colloid) for recurrent joint effusions after endoprosthetic knee replacement. A total of 46 patients were followed up and questioned anonymously according to a modified Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery score. On the basis of patient records, a subgroup analysis of patients with revision surgery after RSO (subgroup A) and without further operative interventions (subgroup B) was performed.
RESULTSSubgroup A comprised 46% (21/46) and subgroup B comprised 54% (25/46) of all patients. Most patients from subgroup A did not benefit from RSO. Of these 21 patients, 7 presented with low-grade infection, 7 presented with signs of endoprosthetic loosening, 2 presented with metal allergy, and 2 had undergone revision because of trauma.Patients in subgroup B experienced a significant improvement in pain (KSS score, from 22.5 to 34 points) and function (KSS score, from 62.9 to 77.3 points; Hospital for Special Surgery score, from 30.2 to 38.7) after RSO.
CONCLUSIONSRadiosynoviorthesis resulted in an improvement in pain and function in ∼50% of patients with knee endoprostheses. In 85% of all patients, in whom RSO treatment failed, endoprosthetic complications like infection, loosening, allergy, and trauma were detected.In conclusion, RSO is a valid therapeutic option for joint effusions after knee arthroplasties. However, if RSO fails, a thorough exclusion of endoprosthetic complications should be performed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825ae488 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024932893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024932893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-aae09e239bece8d19e03b1e5436c24b298d63d5d370a55c349f28ffc85f5df2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1P3DAQhq2qVVko_6BCOfYSsGfixD4itHyuVGkF5-A4467bbLzYCYh_XyNokfDB1ljvMzN6GPsu-LHgujlZr-6OeccFEgoF0lCl1Ce2EBLrkgPoz2zBscZSNzXssf2UfnMualFXX9keQKNkpZsFu1-b3of0PIZHH-K0oeRT4UIsbiOZyY-_ijXZOUYap-I6-HwvnZuTD2MqTt1EsViOfdjFkDI7eVvcjESZ2Q3G0jZT39gXZ4ZEh2_vAbs7X96eXZarnxdXZ6er0qIEKI0hrglQd2RJ9UITx06QrLC2UHWgVV9jL3tsuJHSYqUdKOeskk72DhwesB-vffMuDzOlqd36ZGkYzEhhTq3gUGkEpTFHq9eozWunSK7dRb818TmH2he3bXbbfnSbsaO3CXO3pf4_9E_me9-nMGQz6c8wP1FsN2SGadPyfJA3UAIXwFWuypcvwL9v1Ye3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024932893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiosynoviorthesis for Treating Recurrent Joint Effusions After Endoprosthetic Knee Replacement</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>Mayer-Wagner, Susanne ; Mutzel, Bettina ; Mayer, Wolfgang ; Fulghum, Christian ; Simon, Gerhard ; Linke, Rainer ; Jansson, Volkmar</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayer-Wagner, Susanne ; Mutzel, Bettina ; Mayer, Wolfgang ; Fulghum, Christian ; Simon, Gerhard ; Linke, Rainer ; Jansson, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSERadiosynoviorthesis (RSO) has been established as a treatment modality for rheumatoid arthritis. Other forms of joint diseases like recurrent joint effusions after knee arthroplasties are under investigation. The aim of this study was to examine whether RSO therapy is effective in the application of an endoprosthesis and whether there are common causes of failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween 1998 and 2005, 55 patients received RSO treatment (Y colloid) for recurrent joint effusions after endoprosthetic knee replacement. A total of 46 patients were followed up and questioned anonymously according to a modified Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery score. On the basis of patient records, a subgroup analysis of patients with revision surgery after RSO (subgroup A) and without further operative interventions (subgroup B) was performed.
RESULTSSubgroup A comprised 46% (21/46) and subgroup B comprised 54% (25/46) of all patients. Most patients from subgroup A did not benefit from RSO. Of these 21 patients, 7 presented with low-grade infection, 7 presented with signs of endoprosthetic loosening, 2 presented with metal allergy, and 2 had undergone revision because of trauma.Patients in subgroup B experienced a significant improvement in pain (KSS score, from 22.5 to 34 points) and function (KSS score, from 62.9 to 77.3 points; Hospital for Special Surgery score, from 30.2 to 38.7) after RSO.
CONCLUSIONSRadiosynoviorthesis resulted in an improvement in pain and function in ∼50% of patients with knee endoprostheses. In 85% of all patients, in whom RSO treatment failed, endoprosthetic complications like infection, loosening, allergy, and trauma were detected.In conclusion, RSO is a valid therapeutic option for joint effusions after knee arthroplasties. However, if RSO fails, a thorough exclusion of endoprosthetic complications should be performed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825ae488</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22785497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Gated Blood-Pool Imaging ; Humans ; Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Joint Diseases - etiology ; Joint Diseases - therapy ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Prosthesis Failure ; Recurrence ; Synovial Membrane - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Clinical nuclear medicine, 2012-08, Vol.37 (8), p.727-731</ispartof><rights>2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-aae09e239bece8d19e03b1e5436c24b298d63d5d370a55c349f28ffc85f5df2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-aae09e239bece8d19e03b1e5436c24b298d63d5d370a55c349f28ffc85f5df2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22785497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayer-Wagner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutzel, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulghum, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linke, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><title>Radiosynoviorthesis for Treating Recurrent Joint Effusions After Endoprosthetic Knee Replacement</title><title>Clinical nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>PURPOSERadiosynoviorthesis (RSO) has been established as a treatment modality for rheumatoid arthritis. Other forms of joint diseases like recurrent joint effusions after knee arthroplasties are under investigation. The aim of this study was to examine whether RSO therapy is effective in the application of an endoprosthesis and whether there are common causes of failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween 1998 and 2005, 55 patients received RSO treatment (Y colloid) for recurrent joint effusions after endoprosthetic knee replacement. A total of 46 patients were followed up and questioned anonymously according to a modified Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery score. On the basis of patient records, a subgroup analysis of patients with revision surgery after RSO (subgroup A) and without further operative interventions (subgroup B) was performed.
RESULTSSubgroup A comprised 46% (21/46) and subgroup B comprised 54% (25/46) of all patients. Most patients from subgroup A did not benefit from RSO. Of these 21 patients, 7 presented with low-grade infection, 7 presented with signs of endoprosthetic loosening, 2 presented with metal allergy, and 2 had undergone revision because of trauma.Patients in subgroup B experienced a significant improvement in pain (KSS score, from 22.5 to 34 points) and function (KSS score, from 62.9 to 77.3 points; Hospital for Special Surgery score, from 30.2 to 38.7) after RSO.
CONCLUSIONSRadiosynoviorthesis resulted in an improvement in pain and function in ∼50% of patients with knee endoprostheses. In 85% of all patients, in whom RSO treatment failed, endoprosthetic complications like infection, loosening, allergy, and trauma were detected.In conclusion, RSO is a valid therapeutic option for joint effusions after knee arthroplasties. However, if RSO fails, a thorough exclusion of endoprosthetic complications should be performed.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gated Blood-Pool Imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Synovial Membrane - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0363-9762</issn><issn>1536-0229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1P3DAQhq2qVVko_6BCOfYSsGfixD4itHyuVGkF5-A4467bbLzYCYh_XyNokfDB1ljvMzN6GPsu-LHgujlZr-6OeccFEgoF0lCl1Ce2EBLrkgPoz2zBscZSNzXssf2UfnMualFXX9keQKNkpZsFu1-b3of0PIZHH-K0oeRT4UIsbiOZyY-_ijXZOUYap-I6-HwvnZuTD2MqTt1EsViOfdjFkDI7eVvcjESZ2Q3G0jZT39gXZ4ZEh2_vAbs7X96eXZarnxdXZ6er0qIEKI0hrglQd2RJ9UITx06QrLC2UHWgVV9jL3tsuJHSYqUdKOeskk72DhwesB-vffMuDzOlqd36ZGkYzEhhTq3gUGkEpTFHq9eozWunSK7dRb818TmH2he3bXbbfnSbsaO3CXO3pf4_9E_me9-nMGQz6c8wP1FsN2SGadPyfJA3UAIXwFWuypcvwL9v1Ye3</recordid><startdate>201208</startdate><enddate>201208</enddate><creator>Mayer-Wagner, Susanne</creator><creator>Mutzel, Bettina</creator><creator>Mayer, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Fulghum, Christian</creator><creator>Simon, Gerhard</creator><creator>Linke, Rainer</creator><creator>Jansson, Volkmar</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201208</creationdate><title>Radiosynoviorthesis for Treating Recurrent Joint Effusions After Endoprosthetic Knee Replacement</title><author>Mayer-Wagner, Susanne ; Mutzel, Bettina ; Mayer, Wolfgang ; Fulghum, Christian ; Simon, Gerhard ; Linke, Rainer ; Jansson, Volkmar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-aae09e239bece8d19e03b1e5436c24b298d63d5d370a55c349f28ffc85f5df2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gated Blood-Pool Imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Synovial Membrane - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayer-Wagner, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutzel, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulghum, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linke, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, Volkmar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayer-Wagner, Susanne</au><au>Mutzel, Bettina</au><au>Mayer, Wolfgang</au><au>Fulghum, Christian</au><au>Simon, Gerhard</au><au>Linke, Rainer</au><au>Jansson, Volkmar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiosynoviorthesis for Treating Recurrent Joint Effusions After Endoprosthetic Knee Replacement</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2012-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>727-731</pages><issn>0363-9762</issn><eissn>1536-0229</eissn><abstract>PURPOSERadiosynoviorthesis (RSO) has been established as a treatment modality for rheumatoid arthritis. Other forms of joint diseases like recurrent joint effusions after knee arthroplasties are under investigation. The aim of this study was to examine whether RSO therapy is effective in the application of an endoprosthesis and whether there are common causes of failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween 1998 and 2005, 55 patients received RSO treatment (Y colloid) for recurrent joint effusions after endoprosthetic knee replacement. A total of 46 patients were followed up and questioned anonymously according to a modified Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS) and Hospital for Special Surgery score. On the basis of patient records, a subgroup analysis of patients with revision surgery after RSO (subgroup A) and without further operative interventions (subgroup B) was performed.
RESULTSSubgroup A comprised 46% (21/46) and subgroup B comprised 54% (25/46) of all patients. Most patients from subgroup A did not benefit from RSO. Of these 21 patients, 7 presented with low-grade infection, 7 presented with signs of endoprosthetic loosening, 2 presented with metal allergy, and 2 had undergone revision because of trauma.Patients in subgroup B experienced a significant improvement in pain (KSS score, from 22.5 to 34 points) and function (KSS score, from 62.9 to 77.3 points; Hospital for Special Surgery score, from 30.2 to 38.7) after RSO.
CONCLUSIONSRadiosynoviorthesis resulted in an improvement in pain and function in ∼50% of patients with knee endoprostheses. In 85% of all patients, in whom RSO treatment failed, endoprosthetic complications like infection, loosening, allergy, and trauma were detected.In conclusion, RSO is a valid therapeutic option for joint effusions after knee arthroplasties. However, if RSO fails, a thorough exclusion of endoprosthetic complications should be performed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>22785497</pmid><doi>10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825ae488</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-9762 |
ispartof | Clinical nuclear medicine, 2012-08, Vol.37 (8), p.727-731 |
issn | 0363-9762 1536-0229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024932893 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects Gated Blood-Pool Imaging Humans Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging Joint Diseases - etiology Joint Diseases - therapy Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects Prosthesis Failure Recurrence Synovial Membrane - diagnostic imaging |
title | Radiosynoviorthesis for Treating Recurrent Joint Effusions After Endoprosthetic Knee Replacement |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A34%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiosynoviorthesis%20for%20Treating%20Recurrent%20Joint%20Effusions%20After%20Endoprosthetic%20Knee%20Replacement&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Mayer-Wagner,%20Susanne&rft.date=2012-08&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=727-731&rft.issn=0363-9762&rft.eissn=1536-0229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825ae488&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024932893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-aae09e239bece8d19e03b1e5436c24b298d63d5d370a55c349f28ffc85f5df2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024932893&rft_id=info:pmid/22785497&rfr_iscdi=true |