Inadequate environmental monitoring around offshore oil and gas platforms on the Grand Bank of Eastern Canada: Are risks to marine birds known?

• Published in: Journal of environmental management 2012-08, Vol.104, p.121-126
• Main Authors: Burke, C.M., Montevecchi, W.A., Wiese, F.K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Applied ecology; Biodegradation; Biological and medical sciences; Birds; Canada; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; Dioxins; Environmental effects; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Environmental vigilance; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; Grand Bank; Marine; Marine Biology; Marine resources; Metabolites; Microorganisms; Monitoring; Natural gas; Offshore; Offshore drilling rigs; Offshore engineering; Offshore oil platforms; Oil industry; Petroleum - toxicity; Petroleum Pollution - adverse effects; Platforms; Regulation; Responsibility; Risk; Sea water ecosystems; Seabirds; Synecology; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity; Water treatment; Water treatment plants
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.012

Petroleum exploration and production on the Grand Bank of eastern Canada overlaps with productive marine habitat that supports over 40 million marine birds annually. Environmental assessments for oil and gas projects in the region predict insignificant adverse effects on marine birds from oil spills, incineration in platform flares and collisions. Limited baseline data on seasonal occupancies and a failure to quantify the nature and extent of marine bird attraction to platforms and related mortality undermines these assessments. We conducted 22 surveys to offshore platforms on the Grand Bank during 1999–2003 to measure avian associations with platforms and to determine the level of monitoring needed to assess the risks to marine birds. We document seasonal shifts in marine bird occurrences and higher densities of auks (fall) and shearwaters (summer) around platforms relative to surrounding areas. The limited temporal and spatial coverage of our surveys is more robust than existing industry monitoring efforts, yet it is still inadequate to quantify the scale of marine bird associations with platforms or their associated mortality risks. Systematic observations by independent biologists on vessels and platforms are needed to generate reliable assessments of risks to marine birds. Instead, the regulatory body for offshore oil and gas in eastern Canada (Canada – Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board; C-NLOPB) supports industry self-reporting as the accepted form of environmental monitoring. Conflicting responsibilities of oil and gas regulatory agencies for both energy development and environmental monitoring are major barriers to transparency, unbiased scientific inquiry and adequate environmental protection. Similar conflicts with the oil and gas regulatory body in the United States, the former Minerals and Management Service (MMS) were identified by the U.S. President as a major contributor to the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. The MMS has since been restructured into the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, (BOEM) with separate departments responsible for drilling leases and the regulation of drilling activities. Similar restructuring of the oil and gas regulatory bodies in Canada is needed for better public information, scientific investigation and environmental protection in the offshore. ► We study associations of seabirds with offshore platforms in eastern Canada. ► We document seasonal and species associations of seabirds