Loading…

Long-term outcomes after surgical resection for gastric cancer liver metastasis: an analysis of 64 macroscopically complete resections

Purpose The indication for hepatectomy in cases of gastric cancer liver metastases (GLM) remains unclear and it remains controversial whether surgical resection is beneficial for GLM. The objective of this retrospective study was to clarify the indications for and benefit of hepatectomy for GLM. Met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2012-08, Vol.397 (6), p.951-957
Main Authors: Takemura, Nobuyuki, Saiura, Akio, Koga, Rintaro, Arita, Junichi, Yoshioka, Ryuji, Ono, Yoshihiro, Hiki, Naoki, Sano, Takeshi, Yamamoto, Junji, Kokudo, Norihiro, Yamaguchi, Toshiharu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The indication for hepatectomy in cases of gastric cancer liver metastases (GLM) remains unclear and it remains controversial whether surgical resection is beneficial for GLM. The objective of this retrospective study was to clarify the indications for and benefit of hepatectomy for GLM. Methods Seventy-three patients underwent hepatectomies for GLM from January 1993 to January 2011. Macroscopically complete (R0 or R1) resection was achieved in 64 patients. Among them, 32 patients underwent synchronous hepatectomy with gastrectomy and the remaining 32 patients underwent metachronous hepatectomy. Repeat hepatectomy was done in 14 patients for resectable intrahepatic recurrences. Clinicopathological factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses among patients who received macroscopically complete resection for those affecting survival. Results The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after macroscopically complete (R0 or R1) liver resection ( n  = 64) for GLM were 84, 50, and 37 %, respectively, with a median survival of 34 months. Univariate analysis identified serosal invasion of the primary gastric cancer and blood transfusions during surgery as poor prognosis indicators. By multivariate analysis, serosal invasion of the primary gastric cancer and larger hepatic tumor (>5 cm in diameter) were found to be independent indicators of poor prognosis. Conclusions GLM patients with the maximum diameter of hepatic tumors of
ISSN:1435-2443
1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-012-0959-z