Loading…

Ultrastructural evaluation of enamel after dental bleaching associated with fluoride

This study evaluated the effects on human enamel after two bleaching procedures: with a fluoridated bleaching agent and with topical fluoride application postbleaching. It used 43 enamel blocks (3 mm2) that were ground flat (600–2,000 grit) and polished with polishing paste (one and one‐fourth). Spe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microscopy research and technique 2012-08, Vol.75 (8), p.1093-1098
Main Authors: Dominguez, John A., Bittencourt, Bruna, Michel, Milton, Sabino, Nilson, Gomes, João Carlos, Gomes, Osnara M. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study evaluated the effects on human enamel after two bleaching procedures: with a fluoridated bleaching agent and with topical fluoride application postbleaching. It used 43 enamel blocks (3 mm2) that were ground flat (600–2,000 grit) and polished with polishing paste (one and one‐fourth). Specimens were randomly divided into three groups according to the bleaching procedure: (1) control group, (2) hydrogen peroxide 35% (HPF) and topical application of fluoride 1.23%, and (3) HP 38% (OP) with fluoride in its composition. Bleaching agents were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Three methodologies were used: nanoindentation, to observe surface hardness and elastic modulus; atomic force microscopy, to observe surface roughness (Ra − Rz); and scanning electron microscopy, to observe the enamel surface effects. Group OP had a decrease in the elastic modulus after bleaching, which was recovered at 14 days. An increased roughness (Ra; 32%) was observed on group HPF and had an increased erosion on enamel surface (67%). It was concluded that topical application of fluoride, after using the nonfluoridated whitening agent, increased the roughness values and erosion of enamel. Microsc. Res. Tech. 75:1093–1098, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:1059-910X
1097-0029
DOI:10.1002/jemt.22035